Burns v Vazquez!

[FinitoElDinamita]

I expect Vazquez to win the actual fight. But offically, with help from the judges, I see Burns winning

Agreed to the fullest.. Even though I really dislike Vazquez' semi-coward style of fighting, he's definitely a better fighter than BUrns overall and will win this fight on neutral territory..

But since it's in Burns' backyard, robbery will be in play.. Guaranteed..

[rosco1984]

Yawn!!was only a matter of time before finitos issues with burns would arise!since when has London been Ricky burns back yard? Think ul find it actually Kevin mitchells!lol

[FinitoElDinamita]

Im just being objective, pal.. Vazquez has mastered a frustrating style of boxing that most people can't solve and Burns will be no different..

This fight is going be held in Europe which means Burns is in favor.. Are the Europeans going to favor a Mexican??

Burns obviously has the crowd advantage and he'll receive a gift..

[Galaxy]

I'm going to stay optimistic & hope the judging doesn't interfere with this fight

Vasquez' style will definitely cause problems for Burns & he's as tough as they come, but Burns is also a very good fighter

Vasquez on Pts

[Beanz]

MYTH. Where are the biased judges? Scotland? England? Europe? What a joke. You seem to be saying that a Mexican fighter can only get a fair crack of the whip in Mexico, or possibly America, two places with plenty of dodgy desicions. Burns not only destroyed the idea that he had no stopping power in his fight with Mitchell he also proved that he was a very underestimated boxer. Ricky won't need the judges, just like Froch didn't in Nottingham, despite people insisting he would.

[Galaxy]

MYTH. Where are the biased judges? Scotland? England? Europe? What a joke. You seem to be saying that a Mexican fighter can only get a fair crack of the whip in Mexico, or possibly America, two places with plenty of dodgy desicions. Burns not only destroyed the idea that he had no stopping power in his fight with Mitchell he also proved that he was a very underestimated boxer. Ricky won't need the judges, just like Froch didn't in Nottingham, despite people insisting he would.

I doubt your talking to me

But bad judging is everywhere!

I just hope the give the win to the guy who actually wins

[IamInuit]

I think Ricky will win a comfortable ud without any help from the ref or the judges.Ricky has improved every time out and its been noticeable. He's become more of a complete fighter imo and has even brought a little added and needed power up with him. Perhaps 130 was killing him because he did fight much heavier earlier in his career.

[Galaxy]

I think Ricky will win a comfortable ud without any help from the ref or the judges.Ricky has improved every time out and its been noticeable. He's become more of a complete fighter imo and has even brought a little added and needed power up with him. Perhaps 130 was killing him because he did fight much heavier earlier in his career.

You could be right about that

Vasquez is going to be a tough ask for anyone though, he has a very difficult style, excellent fundamentals, solid chin

Burns has been a study of improvement, he can box, has shown punching power recently, has a good beard

This is going to be a very difficult task for both guys imo

[Dia bando]

I expect Vazquez to win the actual fight. But offically, with help from the judges, I see Burns winning

Agreed to the fullest.. Even though I really dislike Vazquez' semi-coward style of fighting, he's definitely a better fighter than BUrns overall and will win this fight on neutral territory..

But since it's in Burns' backyard, robbery will be in play.. Guaranteed..

Now now what has Ricky Burns done wrong but KO, KEV swallow that pride now Bud.

[Violent Demise]

MYTH. Where are the biased judges? Scotland? England? Europe? What a joke. You seem to be saying that a Mexican fighter can only get a fair crack of the whip in Mexico, or possibly America, two places with plenty of dodgy desicions. Burns not only destroyed the idea that he had no stopping power in his fight with Mitchell he also proved that he was a very underestimated boxer. Ricky won't need the judges, just like Froch didn't in Nottingham, despite people insisting he would.

I never did find out the day when Mitchell all of a sudden became good. How long the Burns groups gonna keep milking that win? But than again what else they gonna use? The Cook knock out? Anyways, Burns did look nice when he stopped Mitchell. But Mitchell was never all that good anyway. And if I remember correctly was he not dealing with legal issues going into the fight? Burns stopping Mitchell might impress a lot of people. But that's cuz they see it for more than it really is

[Galaxy]

MYTH. Where are the biased judges? Scotland? England? Europe? What a joke. You seem to be saying that a Mexican fighter can only get a fair crack of the whip in Mexico, or possibly America, two places with plenty of dodgy desicions. Burns not only destroyed the idea that he had no stopping power in his fight with Mitchell he also proved that he was a very underestimated boxer. Ricky won't need the judges, just like Froch didn't in Nottingham, despite people insisting he would.

I never did find out the day when Mitchell all of a sudden became good. How long the Burns groups gonna keep milking that win? But than again what else they gonna use? The Cook knock out? Anyways, Burns did look nice when he stopped Mitchell. But Mitchell was never all that good anyway. And if I remember correctly was he not dealing with legal issues going into the fight? Burns stopping Mitchell might impress a lot of people. But that's cuz they see it for more than it really is

Add in the Moses & Katsidis wins & Burns opponents at 135 are on par if not better than Vasquez at the weight

I think both guys match up well...

[Beanz]

There is no such thing as the Burns group. Ricky has earnt his own reputation, and Mitchell didn't suddenly become krap because Burns, outboxed, outfought and outpunched him. Credit where credit is due.

[Rantcatrat]

This is one of the fights I'm most looking forward to this year. I'm pulling for Vasquez because I think he's a great all-around boxer. I believe he's vastly underrated. On the other hand, Burns is legitimate too. If he beats Vasquez, does he put himself on the list of greatest Scottish boxers?

[Galaxy]

This is one of the fights I'm most looking forward to this year. I'm pulling for Vasquez because I think he's a great all-around boxer. I believe he's vastly underrated. On the other hand, Burns is legitimate too. If he beats Vasquez, does he put himself on the list of greatest Scottish boxers?

That's how I feel too

Should Burns win I feel he'd be among the top 3-5 arguably

[Dia bando]

MYTH. Where are the biased judges? Scotland? England? Europe? What a joke. You seem to be saying that a Mexican fighter can only get a fair crack of the whip in Mexico, or possibly America, two places with plenty of dodgy desicions. Burns not only destroyed the idea that he had no stopping power in his fight with Mitchell he also proved that he was a very underestimated boxer. Ricky won't need the judges, just like Froch didn't in Nottingham, despite people insisting he would.

I never did find out the day when Mitchell all of a sudden became good. How long the Burns groups gonna keep milking that win? But than again what else they gonna use? The Cook knock out? Anyways, Burns did look nice when he stopped Mitchell. But Mitchell was never all that good anyway. And if I remember correctly was he not dealing with legal issues going into the fight? Burns stopping Mitchell might impress a lot of people. But that's cuz they see it for more than it really is

What are you on about, A KO is a win and you can only win lose or draw in boxing, you are making
a statement that Mitchell was not that good anyway.! Strange most people seemed to rate Kev he
was or still is a very good fighter.Burns has improved greatly and deserves,people's support.
He's a nice guy, a true professional a credit to the sport pity there are not more like him.