Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 51

Thread: Did Oswald act alone?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    905
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    If he did it he did not act alone. The angles of the bullets blowing Kennedy's head off came from more than one place.
    I have seen several recreations of the same shots being made by one shooter. There is still one bullet unaccounted for but that was a shot that missed. I don't know as I wasn't there but all the shots could have come from one shooter.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,116
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3094
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    If he did it he did not act alone. The angles of the bullets blowing Kennedy's head off came from more than one place.
    I have seen several recreations of the same shots being made by one shooter. There is still one bullet unaccounted for but that was a shot that missed. I don't know as I wasn't there but all the shots could have come from one shooter.
    Really? I am sure one went through the throat and another from the side of the head which blew the president's head off.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    905
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    If he did it he did not act alone. The angles of the bullets blowing Kennedy's head off came from more than one place.
    I have seen several recreations of the same shots being made by one shooter. There is still one bullet unaccounted for but that was a shot that missed. I don't know as I wasn't there but all the shots could have come from one shooter.
    Really? I am sure one went through the throat and another from the side of the head which blew the president's head off.
    Well, the reenactments showed the neck and head shot could have come from the book depository. To be honest I've just done some general reading and seen a few shows on it so I am not an expert. If you have info the headshot came from a different spot you know more than me. I guess if it really is some massive conspiracy, which I don't believe but who knows, all of the info released would be suspect. I do think I read that some of the info from JFKs autopsy went missing. I also read Oswalds gun was handled by cops prior to being fingerprinted. So there do exist some evidence of improper evidence.

  4. #34
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    He acted ALONE! Don't be idiots

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4158
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    He acted ALONE! Don't be idiots
    He did physically, but thats where that ends.

    Anyone who cant link Hoover releasing an FBI statement saying there was no evidence of the Mafia within American business and JFK's statement that he was declaring open war on the mob, is in huge denial.

    I dont doubt Oswald acted 'physically alone' and shot the President. But the people behind him and Rubys actions and their group of associates are undeniable, the links between them all are there,they have a history of links.

    I recon Oswald was in the whole thing, but was duped by others,would of been offered a fortune, who then killed him off using another dupe with future promises of title or cash. Then they created another scene, then another, its smart,its the best way to cover your tracks, blame the Jews,blame Castro,blame Jfks women and a jealous mob boss who was nowhere near the spot and had nothing to do with the planning of it. Haha more fool the understudies as they all have to go looking everywhere else for more answers.

    Meanwhile the real cunts were his own bedfellows in politics who got to pull the strings of the puppets they used, save themselves, the cash and get away with it. Brilliant when you look at who historically gained from it.

    Truth is there to see, JFK tried to keep his worse enemy LBJ close to him, by making him his second in command in the party as Vice President (they were opposed they fought each other for the top position). (It didnt work,it backfired, LBJ colluded with Hoover who was being overshadowed by others who had evidence of his private actions). With homosexuality illegal and Hoovers powers on the line if exposed by those photos. = (Hoover well fucked in the ass ).

    JFK had recently openly declared war on the mafia, who (Hoover through his leading of the FBI actually had reports written up claiming the Mafia did not exist within America).

    Why do think Hoover would of done that? Or do you think the FBI were that useless?
    Or will you avoid that fact as well?

    These top men would have had their accusers legally or otherwise torn to shreds.
    Their accusers were their own mistresses their own man servants,whos statements all collude with their known footprint during that time. They had nothing to gain and everything to lose for outing what they overheard and who they saw planning it all.
    You can see who talked JFK into going into Texas, you can see who had meetings with them, phone calls to them before and after.You can see who was pulling the strings in the investigation after the event (Hoover again).

    Thats why the witnesses wait for people like Hoover and Lynden B Johnson to die before they say anything. Wouldnt you? I wouldnt say shit while they were in power.

    You can pretend to ignore the facts of what these men got up to before and after the shooting, if you do, you are left with only Oswald and massive denial over anyone elses involvement politically or otherwise including their personal gains from it. Which is exactly what they wanted you do all along.

    They out smarted everyone, except the people they were paying to serve them who are the only direct witnesses to what happened behind the scenes.

    I believe them,they have nothing to gain.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    905
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    I actually thought Master was about to confess.

  7. #37
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Andre View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    He acted ALONE! Don't be idiots
    He did physically, but thats where that ends.

    Anyone who cant link Hoover releasing an FBI statement saying there was no evidence of the Mafia within American business and JFK's statement that he was declaring open war on the mob, is in huge denial.

    I dont doubt Oswald acted 'physically alone' and shot the President. But the people behind him and Rubys actions and their group of associates are undeniable, the links between them all are there,they have a history of links.

    I recon Oswald was in the whole thing, but was duped by others,would of been offered a fortune, who then killed him off using another dupe with future promises of title or cash. Then they created another scene, then another, its smart,its the best way to cover your tracks, blame the Jews,blame Castro,blame Jfks women and a jealous mob boss who was nowhere near the spot and had nothing to do with the planning of it. Haha more fool the understudies as they all have to go looking everywhere else for more answers.

    Meanwhile the real cunts were his own bedfellows in politics who got to pull the strings of the puppets they used, save themselves, the cash and get away with it. Brilliant when you look at who historically gained from it.

    Truth is there to see, JFK tried to keep his worse enemy LBJ close to him, by making him his second in command in the party as Vice President (they were opposed they fought each other for the top position). (It didnt work,it backfired, LBJ colluded with Hoover who was being overshadowed by others who had evidence of his private actions). With homosexuality illegal and Hoovers powers on the line if exposed by those photos. = (Hoover well fucked in the ass ).

    JFK had recently openly declared war on the mafia, who (Hoover through his leading of the FBI actually had reports written up claiming the Mafia did not exist within America).

    Why do think Hoover would of done that? Or do you think the FBI were that useless?
    Or will you avoid that fact as well?

    These top men would have had their accusers legally or otherwise torn to shreds.
    Their accusers were their own mistresses their own man servants,whos statements all collude with their known footprint during that time. They had nothing to gain and everything to lose for outing what they overheard and who they saw planning it all.
    You can see who talked JFK into going into Texas, you can see who had meetings with them, phone calls to them before and after.You can see who was pulling the strings in the investigation after the event (Hoover again).

    Thats why the witnesses wait for people like Hoover and Lynden B Johnson to die before they say anything. Wouldnt you? I wouldnt say shit while they were in power.

    You can pretend to ignore the facts of what these men got up to before and after the shooting, if you do, you are left with only Oswald and massive denial over anyone elses involvement politically or otherwise including their personal gains from it. Which is exactly what they wanted you do all along.

    They out smarted everyone, except the people they were paying to serve them who are the only direct witnesses to what happened behind the scenes.

    I believe them,they have nothing to gain.
    Bunk! Bunk I say!!!!

    The fucking Mafia helped JFK get elected to begin with. West Virginia primary anyone

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,435
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    970
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Andre View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    He acted ALONE! Don't be idiots
    He did physically, but thats where that ends.

    Anyone who cant link Hoover releasing an FBI statement saying there was no evidence of the Mafia within American business and JFK's statement that he was declaring open war on the mob, is in huge denial.

    I dont doubt Oswald acted 'physically alone' and shot the President. But the people behind him and Rubys actions and their group of associates are undeniable, the links between them all are there,they have a history of links.

    I recon Oswald was in the whole thing, but was duped by others,would of been offered a fortune, who then killed him off using another dupe with future promises of title or cash. Then they created another scene, then another, its smart,its the best way to cover your tracks, blame the Jews,blame Castro,blame Jfks women and a jealous mob boss who was nowhere near the spot and had nothing to do with the planning of it. Haha more fool the understudies as they all have to go looking everywhere else for more answers.

    Meanwhile the real cunts were his own bedfellows in politics who got to pull the strings of the puppets they used, save themselves, the cash and get away with it. Brilliant when you look at who historically gained from it.

    Truth is there to see, JFK tried to keep his worse enemy LBJ close to him, by making him his second in command in the party as Vice President (they were opposed they fought each other for the top position). (It didnt work,it backfired, LBJ colluded with Hoover who was being overshadowed by others who had evidence of his private actions). With homosexuality illegal and Hoovers powers on the line if exposed by those photos. = (Hoover well fucked in the ass ).

    JFK had recently openly declared war on the mafia, who (Hoover through his leading of the FBI actually had reports written up claiming the Mafia did not exist within America).

    Why do think Hoover would of done that? Or do you think the FBI were that useless?
    Or will you avoid that fact as well?

    These top men would have had their accusers legally or otherwise torn to shreds.
    Their accusers were their own mistresses their own man servants,whos statements all collude with their known footprint during that time. They had nothing to gain and everything to lose for outing what they overheard and who they saw planning it all.
    You can see who talked JFK into going into Texas, you can see who had meetings with them, phone calls to them before and after.You can see who was pulling the strings in the investigation after the event (Hoover again).

    Thats why the witnesses wait for people like Hoover and Lynden B Johnson to die before they say anything. Wouldnt you? I wouldnt say shit while they were in power.

    You can pretend to ignore the facts of what these men got up to before and after the shooting, if you do, you are left with only Oswald and massive denial over anyone elses involvement politically or otherwise including their personal gains from it. Which is exactly what they wanted you do all along.

    They out smarted everyone, except the people they were paying to serve them who are the only direct witnesses to what happened behind the scenes.

    I believe them,they have nothing to gain.
    Bunk! Bunk I say!!!!

    The fucking Mafia helped JFK get elected to begin with. West Virginia primary anyone
    Agree 100%. I never said there was more than one shooter. Oswald was the only gunman. What gets me is the relationship between Oswald and Ruby. Two people on the day Oswald was shot said they saw him in Ruby's night club. Those two where killed within one year after the fact. In total 18 people who were a witness or who knew Ruby or Oswald died within two years after the fact. Dorothy Kilgallen who Interview Ruby in jail without it being bugged said she was going to bust the case wide open died shortly there after.

  9. #39
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Agree 100%. I never said there was more than one shooter. Oswald was the only gunman. What gets me is the relationship between Oswald and Ruby. Two people on the day Oswald was shot said they saw him in Ruby's night club. Those two where killed within one year after the fact. In total 18 people who were a witness or who knew Ruby or Oswald died within two years after the fact. Dorothy Kilgallen who Interview Ruby in jail without it being bugged said she was going to bust the case wide open died shortly there after.


    Jack Ruby was a bum. He owned a nightclub, was on some kind of amphetamine, and wanted revenge because Oswald's actions brought shame to Dallas and Texas in general.


    Listen JFK wasn't even going to get reelected due to his crappy first term in office. All the "Camelot"/"The Kennedy's are America's Royal Family" bullshit came along after JFK was killed. All the conspiracies lead to 1 thing.....the left can't cope with JFK's death because a lefty was the one that pulled the trigger so there "obviously has to be a conspiracy". It's retarded. Oswald acted ALONE, Ruby acted ALONE, there was no conspiracy.


    People make up shit about JFK and Lincoln's assassinations but never about Garfield or McKinley's assassinations. And in case you were wondering Garfield was murdered by a religious nutjob and McKinley was murdered by an Anarchist (surprise surprise another lefty)

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,435
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    970
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Agree 100%. I never said there was more than one shooter. Oswald was the only gunman. What gets me is the relationship between Oswald and Ruby. Two people on the day Oswald was shot said they saw him in Ruby's night club. Those two where killed within one year after the fact. In total 18 people who were a witness or who knew Ruby or Oswald died within two years after the fact. Dorothy Kilgallen who Interview Ruby in jail without it being bugged said she was going to bust the case wide open died shortly there after.


    Jack Ruby was a bum. He owned a nightclub, was on some kind of amphetamine, and wanted revenge because Oswald's actions brought shame to Dallas and Texas in general.


    Listen JFK wasn't even going to get reelected due to his crappy first term in office. All the "Camelot"/"The Kennedy's are America's Royal Family" bullshit came along after JFK was killed. All the conspiracies lead to 1 thing.....the left can't cope with JFK's death because a lefty was the one that pulled the trigger so there "obviously has to be a conspiracy". It's retarded. Oswald acted ALONE, Ruby acted ALONE, there was no conspiracy.


    People make up shit about JFK and Lincoln's assassinations but never about Garfield or McKinley's assassinations. And in case you were wondering Garfield was murdered by a religious nutjob and McKinley was murdered by an Anarchist (surprise surprise another lefty)
    Not going to be reelected? He would have beat the shit out of Goldwater. Maybe this was no conspiracy but let's listen to Ruby's own words.

  11. #41
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Not going to be reelected? He would have beat the shit out of Goldwater. Maybe this was no conspiracy but let's listen to Ruby's own words.
    Look at his first term, it was HORRIBLE! Not only that he barely squeaked by Nixon to begin with 4 years of Bay of Pigs, Cuban Missile Crisis, Vietnam, Khrushchev made JFK look like a fool, The Soviets and Vostok 1 with Yuri Gagarin beat the US into space...AGAIN, he was very cool on Civil Rights (he had the FBI on MLK's ass), the Democrats lost midterm elections in the House in 1962, he was beginning "The War on Poverty" and all the other bullshit that got signed into law posthumously for him under LBJ's term.


    Jack Ruby was a nut. He thought at first it was a great idea to murder the man that murdered his President and then he realized he was going to be in deep shit and not a hero so poof a STORY is born

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,116
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3094
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    I actually thought Master was about to confess.
    El Kabong did it, he protests too much.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4158
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    Greedy political nut jobs.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    I don't have issue with anyone thinking that Oswald was part of a bigger picture. Its been so far removed now that we're never going to know the full story (if there is indeed more to it than what we know).

    The problem is people spend too much time obsessing and skewing what really did happen and can't be disproven. Oswald was the shooter, and was the only shooter. If you believe otherwise, you're getting your information from a bad source. Was he put up to it by the mafia, illuminati, LBJ, communists, aliens, ect? Who the fuck knows.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    905
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Oswald act alone?

    If you look at a timeline of what Jack Ruby was doing on the day he shot Oswald it makes it difficult to put him as an actor in the conspiracy.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing