if luis beats mosley will that make hattons victory over collazo twice as good ?

[SweetPea]

But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.

I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.

HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.

Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.

I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?

[Hulk]

But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.

I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.

HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.

Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.

I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?

The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.

[SweetPea]

But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.

I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.

HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.

Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.

I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?

The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.

You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?

[Hulk]

But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.

I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.

HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.

Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.

I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?

The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.

You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?

And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.

[SweetPea]

But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.

I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.

HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.

Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.

I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?

The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.

You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?

And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.

HBO stole the title from Bernard? I thought Taylor stole it by winning 7 rounds...

[amat]

But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.

I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.

HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.

Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.

I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?

The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.

You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?

And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.

So Lampley, Merchant and Manny were the judges for that fight?

[Hulk]

But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.

I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.

HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.

Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.

I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?

The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.

You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?

And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.

So Lampley, Merchant and Manny were the judges for that fight?

They misewell have been, they along with former HBO boxing head honcho, Lou Dibella and his judges SCREWED Bernard over, and tried to make it seem like Taylor had actually won the fight. It was a disgrace. HBO is bias, very bias. To deny that is to be either totally ignorant or totally stupid.

[SweetPea]

But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.

I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.

HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.

Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.

I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?

The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.

You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?

And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.

So Lampley, Merchant and Manny were the judges for that fight?

They misewell have been, they along with former HBO boxing head honcho, Lou Dibella and his judges SCREWED Bernard over, and tried to make it seem like Taylor had actually won the fight. It was a disgrace. HBO is bias, very bias. To deny that is to be either totally ignorant or totally stupid.

Well there must be a lot of really ignorant and stupid people out there, because lots of people agree that Taylor won the fight.

[Hulk]

But HBO don't like Mosley. They would have loved Collazo to beat him, finish his career, and make Hatton look all the better, all in one foul swoop. Thats just the kind of little bitches they are my friend. Listen to them in the Vargas fights, up until it was evident Vargas had no chance, they were NOT givin Shane much credit.

I don't see the logic in this at all. Why would HBO want Mosley to lose? HBO stands to make millions off a potential Mosley-Mayweather fight. Luis Collazo is never going to be as marketable as Mosley. You think HBO would root for Collazo to beat Mosley, even though they won't make anywhere near as much money off future Collazo fights as they could with future Mosley fights? That makes no sense.
And frankly, I didn't give Mosley much credit either in the Vargas fights, because Vargas is a walking corpse.

HBO has a vested interest in Mosley, that's why they've been airing his fights for a decade.

Hopkins is a big draw for HBO and Merchant and gang have run him down numerous times. The commentators are bias little bitches. Face it.

I don't think Hopkins is a huge draw, but that's besides the point.
How have the HBO commentators been unfair to Hopkins? Examples?

The two Taylor fights. The Eastman fight. The MW tournament till he won it.

You're still not answering the question. How were they unfair to him?

And you are still asking the same question over and over again. Hpw about STEALING Bernard's title and legacy in the first Taylor fight, and trying to make the audience believe that it was OK to do so, and that Taylor actually won that fight, that was very unfair.

So Lampley, Merchant and Manny were the judges for that fight?

They misewell have been, they along with former HBO boxing head honcho, Lou Dibella and his judges SCREWED Bernard over, and tried to make it seem like Taylor had actually won the fight. It was a disgrace. HBO is bias, very bias. To deny that is to be either totally ignorant or totally stupid.

Well there must be a lot of really ignorant and stupid people out there, because lots of people agree that Taylor won the fight.

Yes there are. There damn sure are.