Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 57 of 57

Thread: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

Share/Bookmark
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1050
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Pacquiao's opposition at 147 hasn't been great and the division has been relatively mediocre for a while now, but he's consistently fought the best fighters available (Mayweather aside) and has never ducked anyone.
    Give me a break. Clottey, ODLH, Margacheato, Mosley right after getting his ass beat by Floyd? These were not the "best fighters available" at the time of those fights. Go check your back-issues of the Ring, or whatever your favorite ratings are. This is a fact.

    Cotto and Clottey (surprisingly) are the most legit fights of Manny's WW run. And that's a Cotto that at least half the fans and commentators were calling shot at the time (which is true -- he's obviously never been the fighter he was before he got pounded with plaster for 10 1/2 rounds).

    It's not for nothing that loads of people were angry when the Marg and Mosley fights got made because they were clear mismatches against completely unworthy opponents. (The Margarito match is the worst offender of them all -- no way you can defend that one.)
    I'm not saying, Cotto aside, that any of them were great opponents, only that, unless Pacquiao was going to fight Mayweather, there wasn't anyone better available. Ortiz, who despite beating Berto is not a great fighter, had his reputation in tatters and was still at 140 and Berto, while a legit Welter, was viewed similarly. People, myself included, criticised the Margarito and Mosley fights because we wanted to see Pacquiao fight Mayweather, but he choice of opposition was pretty limited at 147. To be honest, I think he would have been better off dropping to 140 and taking on the best of that division, but he didn't do that.

    Who would have been better for Pacquiao at 147? Because he would have been as criticized for fighting the two guys you listed as he was for fighting Margarito, Mosley, and Clottey. Maybe Paul Williams, but nobody was jumping to fight him at that point.
    1. Mayweather, Margarito, Cotto, Paul Williams, and Mosley were all better opponents at WW when Pac fought ODLH.
    2. Cotto was probably the best opponent other than Mayweather when pac fought him; some might argue Mosley would have been better.
    3. Mayweather and Mosley were the best opponents when Pac fought Clottey.
    4. Mayweather and Berto were the best opponents when Pac signed to fight Mosley (PBF and Ortiz were the best opponents by the time the Mosley fight actually went down).

    JMM was not a WW, so I'll leave that one off. Going into it though, it looked like a Gimme for Pac and that was obviously Team Pac's intent.

    So it's misleading to say that Pac fought all the best opponents at 147. He did fight three of them, but only Cotto was actually toward the top of the division *at the time Pac agreed to fight him* -- the other two (Mosley and Margacheato) were clearly not the best available by the time Pac agreed to fight them (the same move Floyd pulls). ODLH and Clottey were never thought to be among the cream of the WW crop at any time during Pac's stay in the division.
    Who did Mayweather fight during this time?
    Irrelevant. The point of this discussion was absolutely not to praise Mayweather. I was just reacting to the notion that Pacquiao only fought the best at WW. They're both cherry-pickers, Manny and May both.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    813
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    I saw a Manny that was way too cautios. If this fight does get made, it's going to be a snooze fest if Manny fights like he did against JMM because we both know Mayweather won't attack until he's pressed. (something I don't disagree with by the way) I doubt the fight gets made though.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1031
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    The thing is pacman is a good fighter and any hater knows that..but the thing is whether pac fights likes marquez against floyd or even if he doesnt i cant see what difference it will make?
    Just answer me this what is this type of pacquio that the pacman fans and other people truly believe will beat or destroy floyd. Ok everyone jumps on the bandwagon and says floyd scared, floyd running, whatever.
    There is no way i can see a victorious pac over floyd.
    Floyd wins on accuracy, defense, stamina, chin, smarts, and power and speed could be the same.
    But accurate power punching with speed +1 for floyd.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1031
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    AND in the last two fights floyd had pressed all the action. The versatility of this man is crazy.
    Go on then, have a go..

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,613
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1015
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    After Pacquiao's last two fights I don't see him using an all out attack. I think if he stays on this tact against counter punchers he'll end up losing to Mayweather in a boring fight. If he can keep down the gas pedal he can out work Floyd I think he can win and it wont be boring.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,762
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2023
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    The big winner from the Pac-JMM fight was.......... FLOYD!!

    Now he can add some "valid" reasons to the excuses he always had for not fighting Pac.
    "He's beneath me.... not worth the shot."
    "I slaughtered Marquez.... Pac barely squeezed by. That proves I'm better."

    Then on the OTHER hand.... this is the perfect time for Floyd to go after Pac.
    "Hmmm.... he sure looked like a chump against Marquez, the guy I dominated. He [Pac] ain't no threat to my precious "0".

    Either way.... Floyd's the big winner. If he chooses never to fight Pac, people will excuse it (as they are now) by saying Pac wouldn't have a shot. And if he DOES fight him.... hell, he'll probably win. Pac's the busier fighter.... but Floyd's defense will frustrate Pac, and leave him vulnerable for counters. Plus Floyd's pretty good with that right hand lead, something Pac would probably eat all night.

    On second thought.... I hope they never face each other. I have no stomach to witness the prancing, strutting Floyd crowing about how he's the best who's ever lived and so on and so forth. Let the speculation remain.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1344
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    The big winner from the Pac-JMM fight was.......... FLOYD!!

    Now he can add some "valid" reasons to the excuses he always had for not fighting Pac.
    "He's beneath me.... not worth the shot."
    "I slaughtered Marquez.... Pac barely squeezed by. That proves I'm better."

    Then on the OTHER hand.... this is the perfect time for Floyd to go after Pac.
    "Hmmm.... he sure looked like a chump against Marquez, the guy I dominated. He [Pac] ain't no threat to my precious "0".

    Either way.... Floyd's the big winner. If he chooses never to fight Pac, people will excuse it (as they are now) by saying Pac wouldn't have a shot. And if he DOES fight him.... hell, he'll probably win. Pac's the busier fighter.... but Floyd's defense will frustrate Pac, and leave him vulnerable for counters. Plus Floyd's pretty good with that right hand lead, something Pac would probably eat all night.

    On second thought.... I hope they never face each other. I have no stomach to witness the prancing, strutting Floyd crowing about how he's the best who's ever lived and so on and so forth. Let the speculation remain.
    thing is Floyd will beat Pacquiao, do it effortlessly as he has most of his other fights, then Pacquiao's fanboys will be the ones using the excuse of, Floyd was too big, Manny was on the slide, Floyd stepped on his foot, Jinky fought with Manny again after she lost his socks

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1309
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    The big winner from the Pac-JMM fight was.......... FLOYD!!

    Now he can add some "valid" reasons to the excuses he always had for not fighting Pac.
    "He's beneath me.... not worth the shot."
    "I slaughtered Marquez.... Pac barely squeezed by. That proves I'm better."

    Then on the OTHER hand.... this is the perfect time for Floyd to go after Pac.
    "Hmmm.... he sure looked like a chump against Marquez, the guy I dominated. He [Pac] ain't no threat to my precious "0".

    Either way.... Floyd's the big winner. If he chooses never to fight Pac, people will excuse it (as they are now) by saying Pac wouldn't have a shot. And if he DOES fight him.... hell, he'll probably win. Pac's the busier fighter.... but Floyd's defense will frustrate Pac, and leave him vulnerable for counters. Plus Floyd's pretty good with that right hand lead, something Pac would probably eat all night.

    On second thought.... I hope they never face each other. I have no stomach to witness the prancing, strutting Floyd crowing about how he's the best who's ever lived and so on and so forth. Let the speculation remain.
    thing is Floyd will beat Pacquiao, do it effortlessly as he has most of his other fights, then Pacquiao's fanboys will be the ones using the excuse of, Floyd was too big, Manny was on the slide, Floyd stepped on his foot, Jinky fought with Manny again after she lost his socks
    It'll be bad both ways. Flomos and Pactards are equally and ridiculously annoying in my eyes. It's rare to find a Floyd or Manny fan who likes the other one. It's always so partisan. It's rare to find people who can look critically at both of them.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,276
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3101
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    So this fight should ideally have happened when Pac was in top form beating Cotto and Marg. Pac Man has passed his peak and is on the slide which is the prefect time for Floyd to take the fight. The ship has sailed on this fight and it is only worth $50 million as opposed to $100 million.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,190
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1079
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    I am no longer interested in this boxing match because this is the sport of boxing and there are thousands of fighters all over the world, not just Manny and Floyd. If it did come to brass tacks and the fight was on, I'd have to pick Floyd and I don't like him but he's GOOD. Mayweather is a true student of boxing and he is never out of shape and out of ring distractions are dealt with outside of the square. He is a fighter although I'd prefer to call him a snake in the grass after his last fight., He, make no mistake about it is a fighter with a fighter's mentality. Personally he's a dick but on fight night a solid fighter. He will circle Manny in his range of comfort and send straight punches through Manny's porous defense Ala Marquez but quicker and cut him to ribbons. It could be a very long night for Manny. I didn't always think that way but made the mistakes most fans make, I looked at it as thought I was in his shoes and I was wrong. Floyd by UD or late KO but I won't hold my breath waiting for them to sign on the dotted line.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    Floyd-pac is a gay fight, always was. Mismatch.. To think that people have been clamoring for this mismatch for the past 3 years is something i cant understand..

    A superfight is a superfight only when the bout is dead even at 50-50.. When u have no freakin clue as to who would win... Rafael Marquez-Vazquez was one, Chico-Corrales was another...

    To casual observers, a fight between two of the biggest names in boxing can be regarded as a superfight but true boxing fans know better.. they look for styles and chemistry between two fighters.

    I remember back in late 06, there were two fights on the horizon.. Marquez-Vazquez and Delahoya-Floyd.. I swear everybody and their mamas were chatting away about Hoya-Floyd while like 10 posters were discussing Marquez-Vazquez.. hardcore boxing guys know better... We just knew Marquez-Vazquez was going to be extra special unlike the hoya fight.. It just had that Chico-Castillo vibe to it...

    floyd-Pac= one sided beatdown.. uneventful night...

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    934
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1077
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not clamoring for a PAC-PBF anymore

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    I'm going hiding for the meantime. Congrats to Mr. Marquez I had you winning too. I will forever love PAC regardless
    I'm past caring too.

    I must admit, I will watch it if Floyd mans up & just gets on with a fight that he could win if he believed in himself, but I wouldn't be too sad if the fight didn't happen now.

    They pontificated for so long that one or either of them could be past their bests whenever the fight happens now.
    The legend of Drederick Tatum!Hidden Content

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. They don't make them like this anymore!
    By Kel in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-27-2015, 01:51 PM
  2. Are you idealistic about boxing at all anymore
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-14-2010, 10:09 PM
  3. Anymore News?
    By BoxerGaz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-27-2008, 03:26 PM
  4. Okay I can't stand it anymore!
    By Wayne in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-10-2007, 03:13 PM
  5. US no boxing power anymore!
    By TyBuff in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-05-2006, 04:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing