So what you're saying is that Mitchell didn't start out with a silver spoon in his mouth like Amir did and that's why he hasn't had the world title fights and opportunites to fight legends.
In other words, Khan has had these opportunities unfairly.
But on the other hand, even though you are unhappy Amir has had a world title opportunity, and a chance at high profile opportunity, you ironically wish he would have gone even further, fighting even more higher profile fighters and better world champions than what he has (unfairly) already done?
Enjoy your lie down.![]()
Well Amir was sparked in under a minute which didn't help his progress either.
Honestly what about Amir's career so far do you think was wrong?
Remember he turned professional at 17, and was really still a boy. Most people turn pro a few years older than that and Amir needed to have some time to grow into his frame and get some mental and physical maturity before stepping up.
I really don't see what more he could have done. People can argue he should have faced Murray or Thaxton but really I don't see when he had the time. He was rising fast, then collapsed and had to take a different path to get his career back on track.
I think taking on Willie Limond, Scott Lawton, Graham Earl and Gary St Clair in successive fights was a good resume for Amir, all of them were either British, Commonwealth or former world champions and Amir was only a couple of years older than you, not sure if you're ready for them yet?
I think Amir's career has been moved along nicely, he's world champ now, he's fought his mandatory and now is looking to break America, around 7 years sooner than Ricky managed and a decade earlier than Calzaghe!
I havn't head anybody rain on David Haye for fighting John Ruiz next in his mandatory defence. Everybody seems to recognise it's a necessary fight to get out of the way and will allow him time before he faces a top guy.
Why was it different for Amir?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks