Hi guys, being in the UK I really wanted to go see Hatton-Mayweather, but it's gunna cost me £1100 minimum before I get there, so to save money, I'm going over to NYC to watch Cotto-Mosley. Anyone else gunna be there?
Hi guys, being in the UK I really wanted to go see Hatton-Mayweather, but it's gunna cost me £1100 minimum before I get there, so to save money, I'm going over to NYC to watch Cotto-Mosley. Anyone else gunna be there?
I might be there. I'm still debating because I truly believe watching it on TV allows you to see more of the fight than in person. I know it depends on the seats, but even front row you might have that 6'8 300 lb offensive lineman standing right in front of you.Originally Posted by bzkfn
![]()
Live boxing is more interesting. You can hear the sound of punches clearer.I'd admit though that watching it on TV is better in terms of judging.At the same time, you can watch it at slow motion.You can also replay if you have recorded it.Originally Posted by Eli_jr24
![]()
Ikariam
I went to see Cotto v.s. Quintana and I had fun!! I also won $500 dollars because I said that Quintana wasn't going to last 7 rounds with Cotto. I could hear Quintana's ribs crack as Cotto landed those left hooks. You're right it is interesting. Then fans make it intersting, but when I saw the same fight on TV, I saw Quintana land alot more punches than what I thought I saw in person.Originally Posted by brucelee
There are so many factors that affects your viewing when you watch it live. The noise, the people in front of you, and the referee, to name a few.Originally Posted by Eli_jr24
Ikariam
....my buddy might be making his pro debut on that card....honestly
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks