
Originally Posted by
nfkzb

Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Malignaggi's comments sounded reasonable to me. In Paulie's mind they have both faced the best competition out there in Mayweather and Cotto but wheras Hatton got his a** handed to him in an embarrassingly one sided fight Malignaggi hung in there with Cotto, a much bigger puncher than Floyd and gave an excellent account of himself.
The only thing embarrssing was the KO. Hatton wobbled Floyd in round 1, most said in won round 2 and some think he took round 3. The first 6 rounds made it a close fight, after then Floyd came into his own. Paulie took a one sided beating from Cotto.
The beating Pauli took from Cotto was anything but onesided. He got busted up early and broke his jaw but fought on and was winning most of the later rounds.
Considering Malignaggi went down in the second official scores of 115-112 116-111 116-111 show anything but a onesided beating. It actually means on one card Paulie tied Cotto dead level over the other 11 rounds and only lost 6-5 on the other two cards.
Mayweather beat Hatton by scores of 88-82 89-81 89-81 meaing Hatton won 1 round on two cards and two on another.
Now tell me who again who did better

Bookmarks