Is it just going to be another bunch of arguments from everybody discrediting him? I can't see him getting any real credit, everybody will just say Hopkins, was Old and Shot and that Calzaghe would never have beaten him in his prime. For all we know Hopkins may well be better now than he ever has, I haven't seen any demise in his performances (o.k Taylor fights were muck) and he was very impressive against Tarver and Winky.

I can just see us all going round in circles again, the way we did after he beat Lacy (the fighter everybody said he must fight) Kessler (the guy everybody said he must fight)