Re: Chad Dawson vs Joe Calzaghe

Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Dawson for me is a big big test for Calzaghe.
I think it's important to state that against Hopkins and Jones Jr Calzaghe was a fairly large betting favourite. He was expected to win those fights.
Against Lacy and Kessler however it was much more uncertain. A betting underdog against Lacy, and only a marginal favourite against Kessler.
A Dawson fight is another one of those 'Who knows how it would go' kind of fights.
I expect if Calzaghe rematched Hopkins he'd start a clear betting favourite.
If he fights Dawson, I reckon the odds would be much closer.
Dawson DESERVES either Hopkins or Calzaghe imo. He's the WBC and IBF world champ and he's beating the other champs to earn his titles.
Calzaghe has yet to win a belt at 175 and surely he'd like to retire a double weight world champ, a claim he cannot yet make.
If he beats Dawson he's not only a two weight champ but he's a two weight universally recognised world champ.
Beat Dawson to become THE man at 175.
And like Kessler and Lacy before him Dawson deserves that shot imo, he's the number one contender no question
Calzaghe is the linear champion. That is far more important than Dawson's IBF belt.
Dawson ONLY has that belt because off the way events unfolded after Roy gave it up when moving to heavyweight. It doesn't mean Roy wasn't the top lightheavy because he no longer had the IBF belt. That is nonsense.
Roy then lost to Tarver at lightheavy. That makes Tarver the top man. Then Johnson beat Tarver. Tarver beat Johnson. Hopkins beat Tarver. Calzaghe beat Hopkins.
To say Calzaghe needs an ALPHABET to claim he's a double weight champ is silly.
Calzaghe could have fought Clinton Woods for this very same IBF title instead of facing Hopkins for the linear title. What is the more important fight?
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks