Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    907
    Cool Clicks

    Default So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Berto, the WBC welterweight titleholder, and Ortiz have agreed to a catch weight of 145 pounds plus one, or in effect 146. That’s one pound below the welterweight limit.
    Breaking news: Berto, Ortiz reach agreement | RingTV

    Just thought this was interesting. Since I didn't know it was at a catchweight. It was brought up on another board when 1 member said Ortiz was a real figther that didn't weight drain his opponents like 1 of boxing's stars, then someone pointed this out. Originally Ortiz side requested it to be at 143, but settled at 145+1. Berto vs Ortiz: Catch-Weight Request is Still an Issue - Boxing News

    Discuss.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    736
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Berto, the WBC welterweight titleholder, and Ortiz have agreed to a catch weight of 145 pounds plus one, or in effect 146. That’s one pound below the welterweight limit.
    Breaking news: Berto, Ortiz reach agreement | RingTV

    Just thought this was interesting. Since I didn't know it was at a catchweight. It was brought up on another board when 1 member said Ortiz was a real figther that didn't weight drain his opponents like 1 of boxing's stars, then someone pointed this out. Originally Ortiz side requested it to be at 143, but settled at 145+1. Berto vs Ortiz: Catch-Weight Request is Still an Issue - Boxing News

    Discuss.
    Catchweights have a long history in boxing. Henry Armstrong, Emile Griffith, Kid Gavilan, Ike Williams, Terry Norris, Barney Ross, Joe Gans and a bunch of other HOFers fought in catchweight fights.

    It's a legitimate way for two guys of different sizes to meet while sharing the burden. People getting upset about this baffle me. They all seem to want the bigger guy to have all the advantages.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    732
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    759
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    I don't think 1 pound is a big difference. In actuallity it was probably Ortiz who was a little more weight drained. Berto weighed in at 145.5 and rehydrated to 156, Ortiz weighed 146 and rehydrated to 161.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    45,841
    Mentioned
    429 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5047
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Don't think it mattered all that much. Ortiz always seems a natural welter growing. Not like we have 8 divisions where its clear anymore so it gets to be a hodge podge. Belts at stake another thing but they seems to becoming less and less significant.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    907
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Don't think it mattered all that much. Ortiz always seems a natural welter growing. Not like we have 8 divisions where its clear anymore so it gets to be a hodge podge. Belts at stake another thing but they seems to becoming less and less significant.
    I discovered this info while browsing on another forum. Some guys gets slammed in the sport for winning titles at catchweights, other guys gets excused or praised. That's the difference.

    These are quotes from the other forum. And it sums it up perfectly with this inconsistency.

    Maybe U should read that again.Berto's team went after Ortiz,Ortiz demanded the catchweight if he were to fight.But Berto went after Ortiz is my point & that's exactly what I said,U misread homey.

    That isn't the same as team Pacman asking to fight Cotto & at a catchweight.Team Pacman demanded Cotto & the catchweight.Berto's team went looking for Ortiz & Ortiz demanded the catchweight to fight.
    That's extremely hypocritical. If you hate Pacquiao winning a WW title at a catchweight, you should have just as big a problem with Ortiz winning a WW title at a catchweight.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    937
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Berto, the WBC welterweight titleholder, and Ortiz have agreed to a catch weight of 145 pounds plus one, or in effect 146. That’s one pound below the welterweight limit.
    Breaking news: Berto, Ortiz reach agreement | RingTV

    Just thought this was interesting. Since I didn't know it was at a catchweight. It was brought up on another board when 1 member said Ortiz was a real figther that didn't weight drain his opponents like 1 of boxing's stars, then someone pointed this out. Originally Ortiz side requested it to be at 143, but settled at 145+1. Berto vs Ortiz: Catch-Weight Request is Still an Issue - Boxing News

    Discuss.
    Catchweights have a long history in boxing. Henry Armstrong, Emile Griffith, Kid Gavilan, Ike Williams, Terry Norris, Barney Ross, Joe Gans and a bunch of other HOFers fought in catchweight fights.

    It's a legitimate way for two guys of different sizes to meet while sharing the burden. People getting upset about this baffle me. They all seem to want the bigger guy to have all the advantages.
    Have all the catch weights you want but not for titles. You think you are tough enough or good enough to move up and beat a guy then do it. Theirs already 17 divisions. The irony is this is an era where you have welters fighting at 135, lightweights fighting at 126 and 154/60 pounders fighting at welter and we need catch weights? Greb never asked anyone for a catch weight and neither did Langford.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    45,841
    Mentioned
    429 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5047
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Don't think it mattered all that much. Ortiz always seems a natural welter growing. Not like we have 8 divisions where its clear anymore so it gets to be a hodge podge. Belts at stake another thing but they seems to becoming less and less significant.
    I discovered this info while browsing on another forum. Some guys gets slammed in the sport for winning titles at catchweights, other guys gets excused or praised. That's the difference.

    These are quotes from the other forum. And it sums it up perfectly with this inconsistency.

    Maybe U should read that again.Berto's team went after Ortiz,Ortiz demanded the catchweight if he were to fight.But Berto went after Ortiz is my point & that's exactly what I said,U misread homey.

    That isn't the same as team Pacman asking to fight Cotto & at a catchweight.Team Pacman demanded Cotto & the catchweight.Berto's team went looking for Ortiz & Ortiz demanded the catchweight to fight.
    That's extremely hypocritical. If you hate Pacquiao winning a WW title at a catchweight, you should have just as big a problem with Ortiz winning a WW title at a catchweight.
    Hey I hear you man. Your right on consistency. I think its more incumbent on the sanctioning body to take charge of its trinket and who is ruled fit to meet for "Championship". Ironically for Berto trinket which was given in a farce of a match up. They strip guys on the scale often, one way title fight because of weight etc. If they want to bend and bow to a network (?) or entertain the fighters making rules for them its just a testament to how irrelevant they are. One round into that fight the shiny pos the fighter held over his head at the end was an after thought.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    205
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    783
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    If there is one thing that keeps poping up on this form that makes me want to stop coming here is all this catch weight BS.

    GET OVER IT!!! Learn some bloody boxing history. Ever since there has been weight classes fighters have been moving all over weight divisions. Weights for divisions have moved around as well. This is such a stupid issue.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    937
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Fight at that weight or don't. Real simple.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Fight at that weight or don't. Real simple.
    Exactly. I had no idea this fight was at a catchweight, but now that I know I think negatively. Either make the weight or else stay in your weight class. I don't like it.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    736
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Berto, the WBC welterweight titleholder, and Ortiz have agreed to a catch weight of 145 pounds plus one, or in effect 146. That’s one pound below the welterweight limit.
    Breaking news: Berto, Ortiz reach agreement | RingTV

    Just thought this was interesting. Since I didn't know it was at a catchweight. It was brought up on another board when 1 member said Ortiz was a real figther that didn't weight drain his opponents like 1 of boxing's stars, then someone pointed this out. Originally Ortiz side requested it to be at 143, but settled at 145+1. Berto vs Ortiz: Catch-Weight Request is Still an Issue - Boxing News

    Discuss.
    Catchweights have a long history in boxing. Henry Armstrong, Emile Griffith, Kid Gavilan, Ike Williams, Terry Norris, Barney Ross, Joe Gans and a bunch of other HOFers fought in catchweight fights.

    It's a legitimate way for two guys of different sizes to meet while sharing the burden. People getting upset about this baffle me. They all seem to want the bigger guy to have all the advantages.
    Have all the catch weights you want but not for titles. You think you are tough enough or good enough to move up and beat a guy then do it. Theirs already 17 divisions. The irony is this is an era where you have welters fighting at 135, lightweights fighting at 126 and 154/60 pounders fighting at welter and we need catch weights? Greb never asked anyone for a catch weight and neither did Langford.
    I hear ya. I do. But I have a different take. If a champ wants to sign a contract that requires a catchweight to fight a smaller man for the crown? I have no problem with that. What a 147 champ cannot do and remain legit is to deny a title crack to a guy who barely makes 147 unless it is at a catchweight. Of course since of the 90+ beltholders today only 5-6 are legit champions? I don't sweat this very often.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1447
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Don't think it mattered all that much. Ortiz always seems a natural welter growing. Not like we have 8 divisions where its clear anymore so it gets to be a hodge podge. Belts at stake another thing but they seems to becoming less and less significant.
    I discovered this info while browsing on another forum. Some guys gets slammed in the sport for winning titles at catchweights, other guys gets excused or praised. That's the difference.

    These are quotes from the other forum. And it sums it up perfectly with this inconsistency.

    Maybe U should read that again.Berto's team went after Ortiz,Ortiz demanded the catchweight if he were to fight.But Berto went after Ortiz is my point & that's exactly what I said,U misread homey.

    That isn't the same as team Pacman asking to fight Cotto & at a catchweight.Team Pacman demanded Cotto & the catchweight.Berto's team went looking for Ortiz & Ortiz demanded the catchweight to fight.
    That's extremely hypocritical. If you hate Pacquiao winning a WW title at a catchweight, you should have just as big a problem with Ortiz winning a WW title at a catchweight.
    It's clear people have to find fault in anything with guys like Pacquiao, and especially on this fight and in the media there are guys they are try to credit with anything. Pacquiao has become an icon where he has to do whats right everyone's eyes to make anyone besides his fans happy.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    205
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    783
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Fight at that weight or don't. Real simple.
    Exactly. I had no idea this fight was at a catchweight, but now that I know I think negatively. Either make the weight or else stay in your weight class. I don't like it.
    So even thou this was a great fight you now don't like it because after you found out it was fought at a catch weight? Interesting.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    856
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    There are other boxing forums?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1333
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So the Berto-Ortiz fight was at a catchweight

    Ortiz is actually the bigger man he weighed in at 161 on the night much bigger than Berto.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Ortiz vs. Berto - Fight of the year thus far???
    By CutMeMick in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-23-2011, 06:37 PM
  2. Berto vs. Ortiz on HBO saturday
    By Mars_ax in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 228
    Last Post: 04-23-2011, 08:33 AM
  3. Things To Learn From Berto/Ortiz
    By greynotsoold in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-19-2011, 08:18 AM
  4. Some final thoughts on Ortiz vs Berto
    By Mars_ax in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-17-2011, 04:33 PM
  5. Could Berto vs Ortiz, Be A Defining Fight?
    By Ant Live in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-06-2011, 12:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing