Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Gamboa: Victim of a bad promoter?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1359
    Cool Clicks

    Default Gamboa: Victim of a bad promoter?

    Gamboa was supposed to be the crown jewel of 50 Cent's promotion company and got his ass handed to him.

    Was Gamboa the victim of bad match-making from a promoter who has no idea what he's doing? Should Gamboa have been tasked with fighting such a big guy in only his second fight at 135, in his opponent's home town?

    Another of 50's fighters, Mark Davis, got his ass handed to him and looked over matched on ESPN last night.

    Are these guys being fucked over by 50, a guy with money but a novice in the fight game? Is he putting his guys in bad matchups?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gamboa: Victim of a bad promoter?

    He lost a fight .

    The End.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1359
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gamboa: Victim of a bad promoter?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    He lost a fight .

    The End.
    Gamboa bad. Crawford good.

    Me Amy... Good Gorilla.

    Conversation bad. Thought bad. Gamboa lose. End of story.


    Get lost, dummy.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,481
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1083
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gamboa: Victim of a bad promoter?

    Gamboa was the victim of Gamboa. To look at it from a promotion perspective. Gamboa has slacked off. Remember all the names he was supposed to meet down the road when he was knocking guys out on HBO. Then his personal problems, promotional problems, his declining uninspired ring performances. He seemed to be sliding. If 50 got him to a title bout for a strap against a guy he did his job. If gamboa wasn't up to it, that's gamboa's fault. 50 could have maybe looked into boosting him with a name trainer but something tells me that gamboa likes to be surrounded by yes men. So keeping gamboa happy and getting him a title shot after lackluster performances, against a guy who was beatable.. 50 did his job and snuck him in when there was an opening for someone that crawford could legitimize himself to the public with. With Gamboa's natural potential, the fight was winnable. With the showing that gamboa made, he could probably easily find himself more opportunities and be the Judah of his division.
    They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.

    Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gamboa: Victim of a bad promoter?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    He lost a fight .

    The End.
    Gamboa bad. Crawford good.

    Me Amy... Good Gorilla.

    Conversation bad. Thought bad. Gamboa lose. End of story.


    Get lost, dummy.
    I kept it simple so you could work it out.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gamboa: Victim of a bad promoter?

    Gamboa is a victim of his own arrogance and going up to far in weight.


    And fighting a better schooled fighter who made adjustments and KNEW HOW TO FUCKING CLINCH!


    And I like Gamboa. Wanted him to win badly.
    "You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,048
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Gamboa: Victim of a bad promoter?

    No not at all, if any thing 50 was just picking through the pieces. The problems with Gamboa were and are as simple as never developing the basics and fundamentals, a complete rush of a star status and frankly fans who got blurry saying he was faster than a Meldrick Taylor etc etc. I still contend that his biggest mistake going in was thinking he could 'box' Crawford, the most complete fighter he has faced, and needed to stick with what brought him to the dance. Gamboa has been walking around with a ring identity crisis for years.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. DeMarco next victim for Valero
    By holmcall in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-30-2009, 02:35 PM
  2. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 08-05-2007, 05:29 PM
  3. Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?
    By tedsares in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-25-2007, 02:26 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-17-2006, 06:04 PM
  5. Purse snatch victim fights back
    By Munkymagic in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 02:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing