Re: Boxing the KING of double standard sports
I think there are a lot of double standards in boxing, but it's not unique to boxing. People will go above and beyond to praise the athletes they love and tear down the athletes they hate, and therein will lie the double standards.
As far as catch weights go, I think most people (including myself) are bothered by the fact that a guy has won and defended the linear world title having NEVER fought at that weight.
I think there's a big difference between that and, say, Gatti and Ward getting together and saying "you're a big junior welterweight, I'm a big junior welterweight, let's give ourselves a break and meet at 142." There's no titles on the line, who cares. I don't think anyone will ever complain about that catch weight. I know big names get to call the shots, but a title should NEVER be defended at a catch weight.
How do you explain that to someone who doesn't follow boxing?
"Boxing is divided into weight classes to keep the fights on a relatively even playing field, and each weight class has a champion."
"How come this guy doesn't fight at this weight class but is still the champ of that weight class."
"Oh because that guy is a big name and draws big crowds in New York, so they let him fight at whatever weight he wants and call it middleweight all the same."
"So this is a mainstream sport where the fundamental rules change depending on how big of a name you are, where the man who draws the most money has the advantage in the ring?"
"Welcome to boxing."
David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King
Bookmarks