 |  | |||
George Foreman Overrated?By Don Caputo December 8th, 2004 All Boxing Articles, Boxing Bios
man to win the heavyweight crown. So where does “Big George” rank as a heavyweight? Most of the lists I have seen over the years have him in the top five, almost always behind Muhammad Ali and Joe Louis but very often above the likes of Larry Holmes, Rocky Marciano and Jack Johnson who were all dominant champions in their respective eras. Was he greater than Jim Jeffries, Jack Dempsey, Joe Frazier, Evander Holyfield or Lennox Lewis? I'm going to look back over his career and you can make up your own mind. Foreman was relatively unknown when he challenged Joe Frazier for his heavyweight crown in 1973. The only names on his record that stood out were Chuck Wepner and George Chuvalo but he had stopped almost all of his opponents early including the iron chinned Chuvalo, so even though he was a 3-1 underdog going in, everyone must have known he was a big puncher. Foreman destroyed Frazier inside two rounds. This was without a shadow of a doubt the best win of Foreman’s career, Joe Frazier had already achieved greatness by becoming the first man to defeat Muhammad Ali a couple of years earlier. In that epic encounter and against the likes of Jerry Quarry and Jimmy Ellis he had looked like an unstoppable force and one of the strongest heavyweights who ever lived which makes Foreman's destruction of him an all time great win. Even though it does not make any difference as Joe had entirely the wrong style for Foreman, I believe he had slipped a bit since beating Ali in 1971. That fight had taken a lot out of him and he was about ten pounds heavier when he got into the ring with Foreman, an indication that he had lost some of his desire. But I would still pick George by knockout over any version of Frazier as styles make fights, the fact that Frazier wasn't at his peak takes nothing away from his victory in my opinion. After knocking out overmatched Joe Roman in the first he scored his second best career win against Ken Norton. Norton had just split two fights with the great Muhammad Ali and was expected to give Foreman a very hard fight. George destroyed him, again in under two rounds. This was the high point of his career, many believed he was invincible and when he agreed to fight Ali many feared he would seriously hurt or even kill the ageing former champion. We all know what happened, Ali out smarted and knocked out the younger, stronger Foreman in one of the great upsets. Although he went on to beat Frazier for a second time after his loss to Ali it was clear he was not the same fighter. He was knocked down twice and looked very vulnerable against Ron Lyle in an all time great slugfest and a few fights later, he was out pointed by Jimmy Young. After that, he retired from boxing. He returned almost exactly ten years later to embark on his famous comeback and wins over Dwight Qawi, Bert Cooper and Gerry Cooney landed him a title shot against Evander Holyfield in 1991. The much younger and faster Holyfield out worked him over twelve rounds to win a clear decision. He came back with a close decision win over Alex Stewart but it looked like the end when Tommy Morrison decisioned him in 1993. He landed another title shot in his next fight against Michael Moorer, the man who dethroned Evander Holyfield. After being out boxed for the better part of ten rounds, Foreman produced a stunning one punch KO to win back his title twenty years after losing it to Muhammad Ali in 1974. He made three successful defenses against Axel Schulz, Crawford Grimsley and Lou Saverese before losing for the final time against Shannon Briggs. Winning back his crown twenty years after losing it at the age of forty-five was an unbelievable achievement and knockout wins over Frazier(twice), Norton, Lyle and Moorer all look very good on his record, but he never truly dominated the heavyweight division for a long period of time which I think should count against him. Foreman was 7-3 in title fights, which isn't that impressive compared to Joe Louis(26-1), Muhammad Ali(21-3), Larry Holmes(21-5) and Lennox Lewis(15-2-1) who were all far more dominant champions. It's hard for me to pick at his amazing comeback, but I think I have to. Who did he beat? He won part of the title but he never proved he was the best in the division. There were a LOT of good fighters around in the early-mid nineties, I have to criticize him for defending against Schultz, Grimsley, Saverese and Briggs regardless of his age. His defenses were a joke. He deserved a couple of easy fights but he should have fought at least one legitimate contender or attempted to unify the titles after beating Moorer, even if he lost which I'm pretty sure he would have considering his age he would have been far greater in defeat in my eyes. Why not lose to Riddick Bowe or Lennox Lewis rather than Shannon Briggs? George Foreman was a great fighter and I don't want to take anything away from him but looking back over his career I believe he is slightly overrated as a heavyweight champion based on his achievements. Related Boxing Articles...
| ||||
 |  |  |
| George Foreman Overrated? Boxing News - © Saddo Boxing.com |
 |
|
