Originally Posted by
walrus
Wait aren’t we waiting on the trial to finish and the jury to make the call. If the jury does not deliver a guilty verdict are we gonna burn shit down? Does the jury have access to facts we don’t or do we use Twitter to make these calls. I’m mean we kinda know how the Twitter algorithms lean. If he is guilty he is guilty. If not guilty he is not guilty. Damn there is always the hung jury right, to we burn shit down if the jury can’t agree to a verdict and he is tried again or do we wait till he’s tried again snd see. Shit if he is guilty we burn shit in happiness like a World Series win. I guess in that regard it a win win. As long as shit burns. Fuck me, Twitter. It’s like a poison. Keep feeding people the shit the they agree with.
"If he is guilty he is guilty. If not guilty he is not guilty."
Insightful.
Yeah I know. The justice system... due process... presumption of innocence unless proven guilty... blah, blah, blah.
Thousands upon thousands of public funds spent in a weeks-long trial... of a case where half a dozen cameras were pointed at the murder from several different vantage points.
Cameras with sound, whose videos clearly show Floyd pleading "I can't breathe!" over and over... until he stops breathing.
In the Court of TitoFan, the process would go something like this:
"Has the jury seen every video submitted as evidence?"
"Has the medical examiner determined the exact cause of death?"
"Was Floyd already dead when Chauvin put his knee on Floyd's neck?"
"Ok. Jury... go huddle for half an hour... and come back with your guilty verdict... so I can pass sentence and go home. I have a Minnesota Timberwolves game I gotta watch tonight."
Bookmarks