Simple question:
Which trilogy was better.... Morales-Barrera or Marquez-Vazquez?
While both were great, I still favor Morales-Barrera. While Morales-Barrera II may have been worse than any of the 3 Maruqez-Vazquez fights, Morales-Barrera I was better than any of the Marquez-Vazquez fights, and Morales-Barrera III was a classic as well.
Some people will point to the knockdowns in Marquez-Vazquez as evidence that it was more exciting, but we shouldn't penalize Morales and Barrera for having better chins. They inflicted just as much punishment, but were able to stay on their feet, and should be credited for that.
Bookmarks