Printable View
this thread is starting to sound like jealousy
wish froch was american do you?
he is cracking entertainment, if he was american he would be a massive star, its a pitty for him he is english coz he would be a lot better off financially
mind you if he was american he might actually think he lost the dirrell fight, but then again he would be american so there would be none of this dirrell won nonesense from americans
ummm who even brought up race here? long and behold we have the British version of milmascaras and Xaduboxer (and i'm Puerto Rican so i could care less if Froch is British or American) try to keep your narrow minded racist views to yourself bud, we already had to eliminate one thread cause it was full of stupid comments like yoursQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44
funny, just like an american to bring race into everythingQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesummm who even brought up race here? long and behold we have the British version of milmascaras and Xaduboxer (and i'm Puerto Rican so i could care less if Froch is British or American) try to keep your narrow minded racist views to yourself bud, we already had to eliminate one thread cause it was full of stupid comments like yoursQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44
there would be no such thing as racism if it wasnt for americans
noone in england cares what colour you are
we do have a laugh at americans quite often tho
i bet it must be shocking to someone who knows jack shit about BOXING when most people say that the guy who did most of the actual BOXING should have won the fight, it's beyond me how anyone could assume that Froch won that fight seeing how all he did was foul and get rockedQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44i am amazed that anyone would think this way, shockedQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesadd in Froch wouldn't dare to take the rematch in a fight that he was very lucky to get a hometown decision in ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
everytime someone suggests that dirrell won that fight it shocks me that someone could think like that
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
youre making stuff up now
i dont mind having a conversation about this but dont start making stuff up
what am i making up? its a fact that the only one who did any boxing was Dirrell, he landed the harder shots, and rocked Froch on multiple occasions, Froch barely threw and when he did he missed, the only thing he seemed to land were fouls, shots to the back of Dirrell's head, low blows, etc., FFS he even body slammed Dirrell, take your Froch loving glasses off and Dirrell won that fight without a doubt, hell if he stepped it up he would have won by TKO, why? cause Froch isn't that goodQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
youre making stuff up now
i dont mind having a conversation about this but dont start making stuff up
chill dude, you are a bit up tightQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoraleswhat am i making up? its a fact that the only one who did any boxing was Dirrell, he landed the harder shots, and rocked Froch on multiple occasions, Froch barely threw and when he did he missed, the only thing he seemed to land were fouls, shots to the back of Dirrell's head, low blows, etc., FFS he even body slammed Dirrell, take your Froch loving glasses off and Dirrell won that fight without a doubt, hell if he stepped it up he would have won by TKO, why? cause Froch isn't that goodQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
youre making stuff up now
i dont mind having a conversation about this but dont start making stuff up
dirrell ran and he ran and he avoided the fight and he made the fight so boring it was tearful, i almost switched off a few times, he ruined the first night of the super 6, and his ridiculousness was comfirmed in round 2, does such a fool deserve to be world champ?
NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aa
His actions in that fight were pathetic in truth but personally I had Dirrell winning the fight clearly but that is my opinion.
agreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biasedQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
This eric44 seems a bit of a village idiot to me.
First his stupid post about 'boxing in politics', most of which was wrong, and now this.
Needs to give his head a wobble imo.
i am not biast and i thought froch wonQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesagreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biasedQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
froch lost to kes, if i was biast wouldnt i be arguing that
hatton lost to collazo, and i am a manc, wouldnt i be arguing for hatton
you said it yourself the fight was so bad that you had to force yourself to watch it a second time, froch had never been in an even slightly bad fight before, can anyone win a fight with such anti-boxing? i dont think so
you don't win a fight by being the most entertaining fighter, if that was the case Pacquiao would be undefeated and Gatti would be considered the P4P greatest fighter everQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44i am not biast and i thought froch wonQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesagreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biasedQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
froch lost to kes, if i was biast wouldnt i be arguing that
hatton lost to collazo, and i am a manc, wouldnt i be arguing for hatton
you said it yourself the fight was so bad that you had to force yourself to watch it a second time, froch had never been in an even slightly bad fight before, can anyone win a fight with such anti-boxing? i dont think so
thats true but you have to fight to win a fightQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesyou don't win a fight by being the most entertaining fighter, if that was the case Pacquiao would be undefeated and Gatti would be considered the P4P greatest fighter everQuote:
Originally Posted by erics44i am not biast and i thought froch wonQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesagreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biasedQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
froch lost to kes, if i was biast wouldnt i be arguing that
hatton lost to collazo, and i am a manc, wouldnt i be arguing for hatton
you said it yourself the fight was so bad that you had to force yourself to watch it a second time, froch had never been in an even slightly bad fight before, can anyone win a fight with such anti-boxing? i dont think so
the judges got it right, as they have in all of the other super six contests so far that have gone the distance
you think there are no decisions come down to politics? you really think it doesnt happen in boxing?Quote:
Originally Posted by koppas
lewis hollyfield 1?
No, of course I agree with you, it obviously does sometimes but the examples you gave in the other thread weren't particulary good examples to be honest.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44you think there are no decisions come down to politics? you really think it doesnt happen in boxing?Quote:
Originally Posted by koppas
lewis hollyfield 1?