Froch vs Dirrell 2 a possibility!!

[erics44]

i bet it must be shocking to someone who knows jack shit about BOXING when most people say that the guy who did most of the actual BOXING should have won the fight, it's beyond me how anyone could assume that Froch won that fight seeing how all he did was foul and get rocked

youre making stuff up now

i dont mind having a conversation about this but dont start making stuff up

[ElTerribleMorales]

i bet it must be shocking to someone who knows jack shit about BOXING when most people say that the guy who did most of the actual BOXING should have won the fight, it's beyond me how anyone could assume that Froch won that fight seeing how all he did was foul and get rocked

youre making stuff up now

i dont mind having a conversation about this but dont start making stuff up

what am i making up? its a fact that the only one who did any boxing was Dirrell, he landed the harder shots, and rocked Froch on multiple occasions, Froch barely threw and when he did he missed, the only thing he seemed to land were fouls, shots to the back of Dirrell's head, low blows, etc., FFS he even body slammed Dirrell, take your Froch loving glasses off and Dirrell won that fight without a doubt, hell if he stepped it up he would have won by TKO, why? cause Froch isn't that good

[erics44]

i bet it must be shocking to someone who knows jack shit about BOXING when most people say that the guy who did most of the actual BOXING should have won the fight, it's beyond me how anyone could assume that Froch won that fight seeing how all he did was foul and get rocked

youre making stuff up now

i dont mind having a conversation about this but dont start making stuff up

what am i making up? its a fact that the only one who did any boxing was Dirrell, he landed the harder shots, and rocked Froch on multiple occasions, Froch barely threw and when he did he missed, the only thing he seemed to land were fouls, shots to the back of Dirrell's head, low blows, etc., FFS he even body slammed Dirrell, take your Froch loving glasses off and Dirrell won that fight without a doubt, hell if he stepped it up he would have won by TKO, why? cause Froch isn't that good

chill dude, you are a bit up tight

dirrell ran and he ran and he avoided the fight and he made the fight so boring it was tearful, i almost switched off a few times, he ruined the first night of the super 6, and his ridiculousness was comfirmed in round 2, does such a fool deserve to be world champ?

NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aa

[skel1983]

His actions in that fight were pathetic in truth but personally I had Dirrell winning the fight clearly but that is my opinion.

[ElTerribleMorales]

His actions in that fight were pathetic in truth but personally I had Dirrell winning the fight clearly but that is my opinion.

agreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biased

[erics44]

His actions in that fight were pathetic in truth but personally I had Dirrell winning the fight clearly but that is my opinion.

agreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biased

i am not biast and i thought froch won

froch lost to kes, if i was biast wouldnt i be arguing that

hatton lost to collazo, and i am a manc, wouldnt i be arguing for hatton

you said it yourself the fight was so bad that you had to force yourself to watch it a second time, froch had never been in an even slightly bad fight before, can anyone win a fight with such anti-boxing? i dont think so

[ElTerribleMorales]

His actions in that fight were pathetic in truth but personally I had Dirrell winning the fight clearly but that is my opinion.

agreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biased

i am not biast and i thought froch won

froch lost to kes, if i was biast wouldnt i be arguing that

hatton lost to collazo, and i am a manc, wouldnt i be arguing for hatton

you said it yourself the fight was so bad that you had to force yourself to watch it a second time, froch had never been in an even slightly bad fight before, can anyone win a fight with such anti-boxing? i dont think so

you don't win a fight by being the most entertaining fighter, if that was the case Pacquiao would be undefeated and Gatti would be considered the P4P greatest fighter ever

[boxingbantz]

This eric44 seems a bit of a village idiot to me.

First his stupid post about 'boxing in politics', most of which was wrong, and now this.

Needs to give his head a wobble imo.

[erics44]

This eric44 seems a bit of a village idiot to me.

First his stupid post about 'boxing in politics', most of which was wrong, and now this.

Needs to give his head a wobble imo.

you think there are no decisions come down to politics? you really think it doesnt happen in boxing?

lewis hollyfield 1?

[boxingbantz]

This eric44 seems a bit of a village idiot to me.

First his stupid post about 'boxing in politics', most of which was wrong, and now this.

Needs to give his head a wobble imo.

you think there are no decisions come down to politics? you really think it doesnt happen in boxing?

lewis hollyfield 1?

No, of course I agree with you, it obviously does sometimes but the examples you gave in the other thread weren't particulary good examples to be honest.