Froch vs Dirrell 2 a possibility!!

[erics44]

His actions in that fight were pathetic in truth but personally I had Dirrell winning the fight clearly but that is my opinion.

agreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biased

i am not biast and i thought froch won

froch lost to kes, if i was biast wouldnt i be arguing that

hatton lost to collazo, and i am a manc, wouldnt i be arguing for hatton

you said it yourself the fight was so bad that you had to force yourself to watch it a second time, froch had never been in an even slightly bad fight before, can anyone win a fight with such anti-boxing? i dont think so

[ElTerribleMorales]

His actions in that fight were pathetic in truth but personally I had Dirrell winning the fight clearly but that is my opinion.

agreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biased

i am not biast and i thought froch won

froch lost to kes, if i was biast wouldnt i be arguing that

hatton lost to collazo, and i am a manc, wouldnt i be arguing for hatton

you said it yourself the fight was so bad that you had to force yourself to watch it a second time, froch had never been in an even slightly bad fight before, can anyone win a fight with such anti-boxing? i dont think so

you don't win a fight by being the most entertaining fighter, if that was the case Pacquiao would be undefeated and Gatti would be considered the P4P greatest fighter ever

[erics44]

His actions in that fight were pathetic in truth but personally I had Dirrell winning the fight clearly but that is my opinion.

agreed, it was a horrid fight, i had to force myself to see it the second time, but it was a CLEAR win for Dirrell, there is no way you could have Froch winning without being biased

i am not biast and i thought froch won

froch lost to kes, if i was biast wouldnt i be arguing that

hatton lost to collazo, and i am a manc, wouldnt i be arguing for hatton

you said it yourself the fight was so bad that you had to force yourself to watch it a second time, froch had never been in an even slightly bad fight before, can anyone win a fight with such anti-boxing? i dont think so

you don't win a fight by being the most entertaining fighter, if that was the case Pacquiao would be undefeated and Gatti would be considered the P4P greatest fighter ever

thats true but you have to fight to win a fight

the judges got it right, as they have in all of the other super six contests so far that have gone the distance