Printable View
thing is that just helps discredit Fightnews and boxrec's rankings even more :-XQuote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
I'm sure you are. :LOLATYOU:Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
You know what, I'm a member of FightNews and BoxRec rankings committee... Me and my colleagues concluded that PAC is the man right now at 140...
soon enough Nonito is gonna be p4p #2 and Viloria is gonna be #1 at 108 :rolleyes:
My girlfriends friend just got a Dobie puppy. Quite a cute little fucker. I don't know if I could eat one as I rather like the breed. I might be able to consume one of those little yappy bastards if I had to. They aren't even real dogs though, more like over-sized rats with long hair. So I guess the real question is, can I eat a rat?Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent DemiseAccording to the flip it's the doberman that really makes the flavorQuote:
Originally Posted by CFHInteresting, I could see throwing a bit of feta into the mix as well. Maybe some mushrooms too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Now I want an omlette, sans dog of course.
I had been wondering what Bobby Pac had done to shoot up to number 6 in the rankingsQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesthing is that just helps discredit Fightnews and boxrec's rankings even more :-XQuote:
Originally Posted by Violent DemiseI'm sure you are. :LOLATYOU:Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
soon enough Nonito is gonna be p4p #2 and Viloria is gonna be #1 at 108 :rolleyes:
I don't take too much stock in rankings anymore. They are now all just opinionated, projected, guesses, and/or bias. Pac is nice but lets look at ONLY the facts. Anything else is what I previously stated. Pac fought once at each and beat a second tier guy at 135 and at 147 and has never fought at 140 and this somehow makes him the king at 140? Hilarious. I guess fighting really doesn't matter in boxing. Why fight? Boxing was my favorite sport but the shenanigans are really sickening even an obsessed fan like myself. There is no honor and intregity anymore. Business, underhandedness, and bias rule the sport now.
http://xs137.xs.to/xs137/09104/pac1at140790.jpg http://xs137.xs.to/xs137/09104/pac1boxrec818.jpg
To those who has problems with the above rankings, you can email your protest letter to:
zaduboxer @ fightnews . com
zaduboxer @ boxrec . com
Thank you... ;) ;D
.
Answer the question do u believe Manny should be ranked P4P #5?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
I agree with Ring Mag, Manny should be ranked #5 at welterweight...
1. Shane Mosley
2. Miguel Cotto
3. Antonio Margarito
4. Joshua Clottey
5. Manny Pacquiao
6. Carlos Quintana
7. Andre Berto
8. Luis Collazo
9. Zab Judah
10. Isaac Hlatswayo
;)
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f7...hwrankings.jpghttp://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f7...ss85/boxhw.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
oh look there, since it says it on Fightnews and Boxrec i guess it must be true :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoraleshttp://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f7...hwrankings.jpghttp://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f7...ss85/boxhw.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
oh look there, since it says it on Fightnews and Boxrec i guess it must be true :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:!!!!
Link please... No links means it photochopped... :lolhaha:
.
don't deny it, :-\ it's just making a point, that just cause something's written on a site, it doesn't make it true....damn that Rain Man syndrome seems more like reality on every postQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoraleshttp://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f7...hwrankings.jpghttp://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f7...ss85/boxhw.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
oh look there, since it says it on Fightnews and Boxrec i guess it must be true :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:!!!!
Link please... No links means it photochopped... :lolhaha:
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesdon't deny it, :-\ it's just making a point, that just cause something's written on a site, it doesn't make it true....damn that Rain Man syndrome seems more like reality on every postQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
Link please... No links means it photochopped... :lolhaha:
.
Well, what I posted are from actual real popular boxing websites. They published these rankings for the whole world to see and they're confident enough that they can back up what they published to the public...
There could be a possibility of an error in these rankings but 2 rankings organizations proclaiming PAC as no. 1 at 140 is reliable enough... They have their own basis for these rankings...
.
yea it's called lots of money and lots of crack ;) lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesdon't deny it, :-\ it's just making a point, that just cause something's written on a site, it doesn't make it true....damn that Rain Man syndrome seems more like reality on every postQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
Well, what I posted are from actual real popular boxing websites. They published these rankings for the whole world to see and they're confident enough that they can back up what they published to the public...
There could be a possibility of an error in these rankings but 2 rankings organizations proclaiming PAC as no. 1 at 140 is reliable enough... They have their own basis for these rankings...
.
Why wont u answer the question? I'll ask again. Do u agree with Boxrec that Manny is P4P #5? Simple yes or no will suffice.... Scared to answer are u?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
I think the Ring is out to lunch on that 147 top ten ranking with Pacquiao,in a huge way.They ran that on ESPN last week,Was I seeing things??Can live with but disagree with them having Pacquiao at #1 p4p but last I checked Delahypa was not a ranked welter but a ranked jr.Middle prior to the fight.So what....Pacquiao #3 Jr.Middle ???
YES... I agree with Ring Magazine that PAC is still the #1 P4P boxer as confirmed in their website's P4P list updated March 1, 2009:
http://xs537.xs.to/xs537/09101/ringmarch1613.jpg
That is not what i asked. Do u or do u not agree with the Boxrec P4P rankings which place Manny at #5? Easy question, only a dumbass wouldnt answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
Of course you do :biteit:.....but what about lil Box-rec and #5......:oQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
I agree with Yahoo P4P list with PAC at #1 getting 30 out of 30 first place votes... ;)
1. Manny Pacquiao Points: 300 (30 of 30 first-place votes)
2. Juan Manuel Marquez Points: 261
3. Israel Vazquez Points: 205
4. Bernard Hopkins Points: 197 ½
5. Shane Mosley Points: 131
6. Rafael Marquez Points: 123
7. Paul Williams Points: 108
8. Miguel Cotto Points: 84
9. Ivan Calderon Points: 60
10. Vic Darchinyan Points: 52
you mean the same Yahoo, who's leading boxing writer Kevin Iole felt that Marquez has done enough to be p4p #1?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
OK boys and girls, so far this is Saddoboxing's very own P4P list:
1. PAC - 295 points
2. JMM - 289 points
3. Hopkins - 231 points
4. Mosley - 185 points
5. Izzy - 164 points
6. Cotto - 113 points
7. Rafa - 91 points
8. Calderon - 81 points
9. Hatton - 67 points
10. Vic - 45 points
Anybody has problems with this, contact JazMerkin or killersheep...
.
But what about Boxrecs rankings. U agree with their 140 pound rankings so surely u agree with their P4P rankings right? U dont just use facts that support your argument then disregard others from the same source do u?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
OK boys and girls, so far this is Saddoboxing's very own P4P list:
1. PAC - 295 points
2. JMM - 289 points
3. Hopkins - 231 points
4. Mosley - 185 points
5. Izzy - 164 points
6. Cotto - 113 points
7. Rafa - 91 points
8. Calderon - 81 points
9. Hatton - 67 points
10. Vic - 45 points
Anybody has problems with this, contact JazMerkin or killersheep...
.
heeeey look at that i already responded to the saaaaaame post you made 5 minutes ago :o, must be a glitch in the matrix lolQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesnot so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesnot so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
Copy & paste,rinse & repeat.Bordering on Spam board really.Wheres my Yawning man Vid ;D....:vd:
you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerWhat about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesnot so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
Those same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerWhat about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesnot so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesyou said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerWhat about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
.
.
Answer the question. Do u or do u not believe Boxrec got their P4P rankings correct when they put Manny at #5? All i and some others wanna know.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerSo you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesyou said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
Really Kevin said that?? But it's up there, PAC gather 30 first place votes out of 30 boxing writers/"experts"... Kevin must be joking... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesyou mean the same Yahoo, who's leading boxing writer Kevin Iole felt that Marquez has done enough to be p4p #1?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" MarquezQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerSo you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesyou said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
Boxrec rankings are not done by experts... :lickish:Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleThose same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerWhat about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
.
.
FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.;)
After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.
Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.
Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.
If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.
Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?
JMM is chasing Pac coz he knows he was defeated by Pac. For short, he's insecure with his status. If he's not, why chase Pac?Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesno dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" MarquezQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerSo you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
.
Pac is still p4p numero uno and JMM is just bitter with losing to Pac just as many of his fans are. FACT.
Well dude... It's their list being viewed by millions of people while your list might end up in a garbage can together with other shits... Just think about that dude...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesno dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" MarquezQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerSo you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
.
.
Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La HoyaQuote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.
and the same way you just discredited their oh so holy list, by saying they're not "experts", get a fucking opinion and stand by it you nutsucking coward lol decide do you agree with Boxrec fully? or just pick out what you wanna hear and then blow off the rest, like eagle said, if Boxrec's listing is so accurate by putting Pacquiao at #1 at 140, than i guess their putting Pacquiao at #5 for p4p has to make sense as well to youQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerWell dude... It's their list being viewed by millions of people while your list might end up in a garbage can together with other shits... Just think about that dude...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesno dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" MarquezQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesBruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La HoyaQuote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.
If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM;D
Thats complete and utter bullshit. Saddoboxer agrees that Pac is #1 at 140 and used Boxrec's rankings to back up his argument. Yet the same site has Manny ranked #5 P4P which im sure he wont agree with. He wont admit that tho and dodges the issue like a dumbass cos he knows if he admits Boxrec were wrong on their P4P rankings it kills their other rankings credibility. If u think anything else your deluded.Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee