 |
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
heeeey look at that i already responded to the saaaaaame post you made 5 minutes agonot so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1, must be a glitch in the matrix lol
Just a dude in blue.
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Copy & paste,rinse & repeat.Bordering on Spam board really.Wheres my Yawning man Vid....
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1
.
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lolWhat about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1
.
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lolWhat about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
.
.
Little Aussie Battler
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Answer the question. Do u or do u not believe Boxrec got their P4P rankings correct when they put Manny at #5? All i and some others wanna know.So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lol
.
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" MarquezSo you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lol
.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
JMM is chasing Pac coz he knows he was defeated by Pac. For short, he's insecure with his status. If he's not, why chase Pac?no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" MarquezSo you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....
.
Pac is still p4p numero uno and JMM is just bitter with losing to Pac just as many of his fans are. FACT.
Ikariam
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
PAC already gave JMM 2 chances... but JMM can't convincingly defeat PAC... You can't really criticize PAC if he won't give JMM a 3rd chance... Also PAC is going for big fights before he retires... He has one more fight left after Hatton... Why give it to JMM when there's still PBF, Cotto, Mosley, etc. out there... We already seen a PAC-JMM fight 2 times already and what we saw on both occassions was JMM kissing the canvass... I'm tired of seeing JMM with his butt on the canvass...JMM is chasing Pac coz he knows he was defeated by Pac. For short, he's insecure with his status. If he's not, why chase Pac?no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" Marquez
Pac is still p4p numero uno and JMM is just bitter with losing to Pac just as many of his fans are. FACT.
.
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Well dude... It's their list being viewed by millions of people while your list might end up in a garbage can together with other shits... Just think about that dude...no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" MarquezSo you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....
.
.
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
and the same way you just discredited their oh so holy list, by saying they're not "experts", get a fucking opinion and stand by it you nutsucking coward lol decide do you agree with Boxrec fully? or just pick out what you wanna hear and then blow off the rest, like eagle said, if Boxrec's listing is so accurate by putting Pacquiao at #1 at 140, than i guess their putting Pacquiao at #5 for p4p has to make sense as well to youWell dude... It's their list being viewed by millions of people while your list might end up in a garbage can together with other shits... Just think about that dude...no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" Marquez
.
Little Aussie Battler
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Those same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1
.
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Boxrec rankings are not done by experts...Those same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
.
.
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
like i said nutthugger make up your mindBoxrec rankings are not done by experts...Those same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.
.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks