FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

[eagle]

I agree with Yahoo P4P list with PAC at #1 getting 30 out of 30 first place votes...

1. Manny Pacquiao Points: 300 (30 of 30 first-place votes)
2. Juan Manuel Marquez Points: 261
3. Israel Vazquez Points: 205
4. Bernard Hopkins Points: 197 ½
5. Shane Mosley Points: 131
6. Rafael Marquez Points: 123
7. Paul Williams Points: 108
8. Miguel Cotto Points: 84
9. Ivan Calderon Points: 60
10. Vic Darchinyan Points: 52

But what about Boxrecs rankings. U agree with their 140 pound rankings so surely u agree with their P4P rankings right? U dont just use facts that support your argument then disregard others from the same source do u?

[ElTerribleMorales]

OK boys and girls, so far this is Saddoboxing's very own P4P list:

1. PAC - 295 points
2. JMM - 289 points
3. Hopkins - 231 points
4. Mosley - 185 points
5. Izzy - 164 points
6. Cotto - 113 points
7. Rafa - 91 points
8. Calderon - 81 points
9. Hatton - 67 points
10. Vic - 45 points

Anybody has problems with this, contact JazMerkin or killersheep...
.

not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1

[XaduBoxer]

OK boys and girls, so far this is Saddoboxing's very own P4P list:

1. PAC - 295 points
2. JMM - 289 points
3. Hopkins - 231 points
4. Mosley - 185 points
5. Izzy - 164 points
6. Cotto - 113 points
7. Rafa - 91 points
8. Calderon - 81 points
9. Hatton - 67 points
10. Vic - 45 points

Anybody has problems with this, contact JazMerkin or killersheep...
.

[ElTerribleMorales]

OK boys and girls, so far this is Saddoboxing's very own P4P list:

1. PAC - 295 points
2. JMM - 289 points
3. Hopkins - 231 points
4. Mosley - 185 points
5. Izzy - 164 points
6. Cotto - 113 points
7. Rafa - 91 points
8. Calderon - 81 points
9. Hatton - 67 points
10. Vic - 45 points

Anybody has problems with this, contact JazMerkin or killersheep...
.

not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1

heeeey look at that i already responded to the saaaaaame post you made 5 minutes ago , must be a glitch in the matrix lol

[XaduBoxer]

OK boys and girls, so far this is Saddoboxing's very own P4P list:

1. PAC - 295 points
2. JMM - 289 points
3. Hopkins - 231 points
4. Mosley - 185 points
5. Izzy - 164 points
6. Cotto - 113 points
7. Rafa - 91 points
8. Calderon - 81 points
9. Hatton - 67 points
10. Vic - 45 points

Anybody has problems with this, contact JazMerkin or killersheep...
.

not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1

What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
.

[Spicoli]

Copy & paste,rinse & repeat.Bordering on Spam board really.Wheres my Yawning man Vid ....

[ElTerribleMorales]

OK boys and girls, so far this is Saddoboxing's very own P4P list:

1. PAC - 295 points
2. JMM - 289 points
3. Hopkins - 231 points
4. Mosley - 185 points
5. Izzy - 164 points
6. Cotto - 113 points
7. Rafa - 91 points
8. Calderon - 81 points
9. Hatton - 67 points
10. Vic - 45 points

Anybody has problems with this, contact JazMerkin or killersheep...
.

not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1

What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
.

you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lol

[eagle]

OK boys and girls, so far this is Saddoboxing's very own P4P list:

1. PAC - 295 points
2. JMM - 289 points
3. Hopkins - 231 points
4. Mosley - 185 points
5. Izzy - 164 points
6. Cotto - 113 points
7. Rafa - 91 points
8. Calderon - 81 points
9. Hatton - 67 points
10. Vic - 45 points

Anybody has problems with this, contact JazMerkin or killersheep...
.

not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1

What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
.

Those same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.

[XaduBoxer]

not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1

What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
.

you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lol

So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....
.

[eagle]

What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
.

you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lol

So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....
.

Answer the question. Do u or do u not believe Boxrec got their P4P rankings correct when they put Manny at #5? All i and some others wanna know.

[XaduBoxer]

I agree with Yahoo P4P list with PAC at #1 getting 30 out of 30 first place votes...

1. Manny Pacquiao Points: 300 (30 of 30 first-place votes)
2. Juan Manuel Marquez Points: 261
3. Israel Vazquez Points: 205
4. Bernard Hopkins Points: 197 ½
5. Shane Mosley Points: 131
6. Rafael Marquez Points: 123
7. Paul Williams Points: 108
8. Miguel Cotto Points: 84
9. Ivan Calderon Points: 60
10. Vic Darchinyan Points: 52

you mean the same Yahoo, who's leading boxing writer Kevin Iole felt that Marquez has done enough to be p4p #1?

Really Kevin said that?? But it's up there, PAC gather 30 first place votes out of 30 boxing writers/"experts"... Kevin must be joking...
.

[ElTerribleMorales]

What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
.

you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lol

So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....
.

no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" Marquez

[XaduBoxer]

not so many are arguing the fact that Pacquiao can be p4p #1, i think everyone except you is in agreement that there is no way in hell that Pacquiao should be anywhere in the top 10 in a division he's never fought in much less #1

What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
.

Those same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.

Boxrec rankings are not done by experts...
.

[brucelee]

FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.


After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.

Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.

Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.

If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.

Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?

[brucelee]

you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lol

So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....
.

no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" Marquez

JMM is chasing Pac coz he knows he was defeated by Pac. For short, he's insecure with his status. If he's not, why chase Pac?

Pac is still p4p numero uno and JMM is just bitter with losing to Pac just as many of his fans are. FACT.