-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
I disagree with the slant that Mayeather didi not want the fight. It is a conjecture that is based on a complete transformation of logic. The condition for the fight to happen was for both fighters to subject themselves to random testing. It was Manny who rejected the condition, not PBF. So leaping over Manny's rejection of that condition in order to rationalize the obvious hatred many have for PBF might be sound plausible in the inner ear or mind, but it is ludicrous.
And now what will the naysayers come up with since Mosely has agreed to the very conditions that Manny rejected. I like to call a spade a spade. There is visceral hatred among some boxing fans for PBF because he is not supplicant. It is no coincidence that the fighters these people like are those who are supplicant, are not assertive, and because of that provide a level of psychological comfort they do not find with personalities like Muhammed Ali, PBF, Jack Johnson ets. It walks and quacks like a duck, this is no swan.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Althugz
Anyone who thinks Floyd is scared of fighting Manny Pacquiao for 40 million is a retard.
Floyd was calling out Oscar DelaHoya at 154 back when he was a 130lb'er and Larry Merchant was laughing his ass off at the thought.
Floyd is scared of one thing - Money (or lack there of)
Bunch of conspiracy theorists :rolleyes: What happens if the Mosley fight comes off? Mayweather was scared of Pac but not Mosley which is a much harder fight for him?
Well... that's pretty lame ass argument! Floyd did even know what a Million dollars looked like back then and Oscar was raking in the stuff. Who wasn't calling out Oscar? Same as who isn't calling out Pacquiao? Besides that Mayweather had a different outlook on boxing. His statement today is "legacy don't pay the bills" well if you take him at his word then why insist on the additional testing? when all he had to do was sign and be done with it so he could count another $100 Million dollars on youtube.
So, If he wasn't afraid to make the fight, what do you call it?
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Well here's the thing, people that are on FLoyd's side keeps on bringing up Shane Mosley and how he passed the drug tests with ease and therefore the boxing drug tests today are so useless. But isn't Mosley the exception and not the norm? What about Vargas? What about Golota? What about Botha? What about Whitaker? What about Jones Jr? What about JCC Jr? And the lists of boxers caught with PEDs or recreational drugs are long. Is the system perfect? No, but it's not as useless and incompetent as some people are making it seem.
And btw what happened with the emails that Pacquiao tested dirty and tried to kept it a secret? People here and the media were saying that these were facts. No those were not facts but hearsay rumors. I'm still waiting on the emails. And then you have Michael Moorer who supposedly told Team Floyd that Pac was using but then went on record and say not true.
I was really hard on Pacquiao for awhile for not submitting to the tests, but where is the evidence that he's on something special?
I don't want bullshit hearsay rumors and innuendos but hardcore evidence and facts. Can anyone here provide them? Again what happened to the emails?
If someone won't take the test, how are you meant to prove they are cheating? Everyone agree that PED's are probably a problem in boxing. Where better to change the standard than in the biggest fight in history?
It is precisely because PBF is facing "a very live, very dangerous opponent" that he is demanding more stringent testing. What is wrong with that.
If you were going into this fight with your entire reputation and legacy on the line against someone you thought may be on PED's, you wouldn't want to use the test that would prevent him from using, or would you just go i there anyway?
As for the idea that Manny doesn't want to give him the upper hand! If I was going into a fight and my opponent said that I was so good that the only explanation was that I was on PEDs, that would be a huge boost to my confidence. I get the advantage by saying I'll test anytime any where, unless I was............
Hell I could have won the Nobel prize in Maths but I just didn't want to go that way. Because I didn't, you can't prove that I couldn't have.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brucelee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Well here's the thing, people that are on FLoyd's side keeps on bringing up Shane Mosley and how he passed the drug tests with ease and therefore the boxing drug tests today are so useless. But isn't Mosley the exception and not the norm? What about Vargas? What about Golota? What about Botha? What about Whitaker? What about Jones Jr? What about JCC Jr? And the lists of boxers caught with PEDs or recreational drugs are long. Is the system perfect? No, but it's not as useless and incompetent as some people are making it seem.
And btw what happened with the emails that Pacquiao tested dirty and tried to kept it a secret? People here and the media were saying that these were facts. No those were not facts but hearsay rumors. I'm still waiting on the emails. And then you have Michael Moorer who supposedly told Team Floyd that Pac was using but then went on record and say not true.
I was really hard on Pacquiao for awhile for not submitting to the tests, but where is the evidence that he's on something special?
I don't want bullshit hearsay rumors and innuendos but hardcore evidence and facts. Can anyone here provide them? Again what happened to the emails?
Those issues were made to demolish Pac. Just for them to have something to say that they have a proof.:-\
And the proof Pac is not on PEDs is............
Oh thats right he passed all the other tests that numerous experts have said are a joke. The whole saga could have been bi-passed and PBF left looked stupid if Manny just said fine. But instead we had a whole range of constantly changing reasons for why he can't.
I'm fully behind the legal system of innocent until proven guilty and that is the only way that it can work, but I'm not naive/ stupid enough to believe that everyone that is found not guilty is innocent.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sanj16
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Well here's the thing, people that are on FLoyd's side keeps on bringing up Shane Mosley and how he passed the drug tests with ease and therefore the boxing drug tests today are so useless. But isn't Mosley the exception and not the norm? What about Vargas? What about Golota? What about Botha? What about Whitaker? What about Jones Jr? What about JCC Jr? And the lists of boxers caught with PEDs or recreational drugs are long. Is the system perfect? No, but it's not as useless and incompetent as some people are making it seem.
And btw what happened with the emails that Pacquiao tested dirty and tried to kept it a secret? People here and the media were saying that these were facts. No those were not facts but hearsay rumors. I'm still waiting on the emails. And then you have Michael Moorer who supposedly told Team Floyd that Pac was using but then went on record and say not true.
I was really hard on Pacquiao for awhile for not submitting to the tests, but where is the evidence that he's on something special?
I don't want bullshit hearsay rumors and innuendos but hardcore evidence and facts. Can anyone here provide them? Again what happened to the emails?
If someone won't take the test, how are you meant to prove they are cheating? Everyone agree that PED's are probably a problem in boxing. Where better to change the standard than in the biggest fight in history?
It is precisely because PBF is facing "a very live, very dangerous opponent" that he is demanding more stringent testing. What is wrong with that.
If you were going into this fight with your entire reputation and legacy on the line against someone you thought may be on PED's, you wouldn't want to use the test that would prevent him from using, or would you just go i there anyway?
As for the idea that Manny doesn't want to give him the upper hand! If I was going into a fight and my opponent said that I was so good that the only explanation was that I was on PEDs, that would be a huge boost to my confidence. I get the advantage by saying I'll test anytime any where, unless I was............
Hell I could have won the Nobel prize in Maths but I just didn't want to go that way. Because I didn't, you can't prove that I couldn't have.
Sorry the burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused. I can say that you like to touch little kids like Michael Jackson and Gary Glitter and that if you don't take this pedophile test then you are guilty is not proof especially if you weren't suspected of it before.;D
BTW I'm still waiting for emails that said Pacquiao tested dirty and wanted to cover it up. I'm still waiting for these so called hard evidence. So where is it? It's been practically a month already. Can you answer me?
For a while I thought maybe the guy is on something, then it dawn on me that most of this shit was hearsay rumors like the emails and Floyds dad starting the rumors because his fighter Hatton got sparked out in 2 rounds.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sanj16
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Well here's the thing, people that are on FLoyd's side keeps on bringing up Shane Mosley and how he passed the drug tests with ease and therefore the boxing drug tests today are so useless. But isn't Mosley the exception and not the norm? What about Vargas? What about Golota? What about Botha? What about Whitaker? What about Jones Jr? What about JCC Jr? And the lists of boxers caught with PEDs or recreational drugs are long. Is the system perfect? No, but it's not as useless and incompetent as some people are making it seem.
And btw what happened with the emails that Pacquiao tested dirty and tried to kept it a secret? People here and the media were saying that these were facts. No those were not facts but hearsay rumors. I'm still waiting on the emails. And then you have Michael Moorer who supposedly told Team Floyd that Pac was using but then went on record and say not true.
I was really hard on Pacquiao for awhile for not submitting to the tests, but where is the evidence that he's on something special?
I don't want bullshit hearsay rumors and innuendos but hardcore evidence and facts. Can anyone here provide them? Again what happened to the emails?
If someone won't take the test, how are you meant to prove they are cheating? Everyone agree that PED's are probably a problem in boxing. Where better to change the standard than in the biggest fight in history?
It is precisely because PBF is facing "a very live, very dangerous opponent" that he is demanding more stringent testing. What is wrong with that.
If you were going into this fight with your entire reputation and legacy on the line against someone you thought may be on PED's, you wouldn't want to use the test that would prevent him from using, or would you just go i there anyway?
As for the idea that Manny doesn't want to give him the upper hand! If I was going into a fight and my opponent said that I was so good that the only explanation was that I was on PEDs, that would be a huge boost to my confidence. I get the advantage by saying I'll test anytime any where, unless I was............
Hell I could have won the Nobel prize in Maths but I just didn't want to go that way. Because I didn't, you can't prove that I couldn't have.
Sorry the burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused. I can say that you like to touch little kids like Michael Jackson and Gary Glitter and that if you don't take this pedophile test then you are guilty is not proof especially if you weren't suspected of it before.;D
BTW I'm still waiting for emails that said Pacquiao tested dirty and wanted to cover it up. I'm still waiting for these so called hard evidence. So where is it? It's been practically a month already. Can you answer me?
For a while I thought maybe the guy is on something, then it dawn on me that most of this shit was hearsay rumors like the emails and Floyds dad starting the rumors because his fighter Hatton got sparked out in 2 rounds.
If your doing something extreme and arn't will to rule out the obvious then people will start talking. Using your very own example, if your child's baby sitter has been strongly accused of of being a paedo and everyone is talking about it. If there was a test that they could take, say a lie detector, that would show that they are innocent, and they refused for whatever reason, would you leave your kids with them?
I work in the ED, and if someone is accused of alcohol or drug taking and they refuse a test, then they are viewed to be guilty.
Anyone coming in following an MVA gets a blood alcohol level, even if they deny drinking or have never failed a alcohol test before
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sanj16
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sanj16
If someone won't take the test, how are you meant to prove they are cheating? Everyone agree that PED's are probably a problem in boxing. Where better to change the standard than in the biggest fight in history?
It is precisely because PBF is facing "a very live, very dangerous opponent" that he is demanding more stringent testing. What is wrong with that.
If you were going into this fight with your entire reputation and legacy on the line against someone you thought may be on PED's, you wouldn't want to use the test that would prevent him from using, or would you just go i there anyway?
As for the idea that Manny doesn't want to give him the upper hand! If I was going into a fight and my opponent said that I was so good that the only explanation was that I was on PEDs, that would be a huge boost to my confidence. I get the advantage by saying I'll test anytime any where, unless I was............
Hell I could have won the Nobel prize in Maths but I just didn't want to go that way. Because I didn't, you can't prove that I couldn't have.
Sorry the burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused. I can say that you like to touch little kids like Michael Jackson and Gary Glitter and that if you don't take this pedophile test then you are guilty is not proof especially if you weren't suspected of it before.;D
BTW I'm still waiting for emails that said Pacquiao tested dirty and wanted to cover it up. I'm still waiting for these so called hard evidence. So where is it? It's been practically a month already. Can you answer me?
For a while I thought maybe the guy is on something, then it dawn on me that most of this shit was hearsay rumors like the emails and Floyds dad starting the rumors because his fighter Hatton got sparked out in 2 rounds.
If your doing something extreme and arn't will to rule out the obvious then people will start talking. Using your very own example, if your child's baby sitter has been strongly accused of of being a paedo and everyone is talking about it. If there was a test that they could take, say a lie detector, that would show that they are innocent, and they refused for whatever reason, would you leave your kids with them?
I work in the ED, and if someone is accused of alcohol or drug taking and they refuse a test, then they are viewed to be guilty.
Anyone coming in following an MVA gets a blood alcohol level, even if they deny drinking or have never failed a alcohol test before
That is just like an educator to state the obvious. It's common sense and not the behavior of someone with something to hide. Not only that, it's not an accurate scenario. If my neighbor was shot to death, why the hell would I let the neighbor watch go through my house to look for a gun when I don't even fukn own one. Besides, as a boxer, I would have beat his ass to death rather than shoot him. I'd tell their dumb ass to go to the police and ask them to get a search warrant.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greig
Hauser excels himself yet again. The man tells it like it is :o
Boxing - Thomas Hauser - Mayweather-Pacquiao, PEDs, and Boxing
"Golden Boy can take the lead on the issue of PEDs in boxing and become a beacon of integrity by requiring its fighters to submit to Olympic-style drug testing before each major fight. And in order to fight on a Golden Boy card (remember; Golden Boy has a lot of dates on HBO), it could require opponents to do the same.
In fact, Golden Boy could start by testing Shane Mosley to protect Shane from unknowingly using PEDs again. It’s interesting how Shane looked very old when he fought Ricardo Mayorga in 2008 and then improved with age when he fought Antonio Margarito in 2009.
And speaking of age; let’s have a round of applause for another Golden Boy fighter; Bernard Hopkins. People talk a lot about what great shape Bernard is in and how remarkable it is that a fighter well into his forties can perform the way he does.
I consider Hopkins a great fighter. Other fighters have moved up in weight and excelled in the manner of Manny Pacquiao. But there is no precedent for a fighter performing as agelessly as Bernard has. I’m aware of no proof whatsoever that Hopkins has used illegal performance enhancing drugs at any time in his career. Of course, to my knowledge, Bernard hasn’t undergone USADA testing.
WBA heavyweight champion David Haye is another Golden Boy fighter. David was a cruiserweight less than two years ago. His body has filled out nicely since then. Very nicely. Now Haye wants to fight Vitali and Wladimir Klitschko. Vitali tested positive for a banned substance while training for the 1996 Olympics and was removed from the Ukrainian national team. He later acknowledged using steroids, saying that he had done so after aggravating an old leg injury previously sustained during a kick-boxing bout. Wladimir’s body is even more imposing than Vitali’s.
If Haye fights one of the Klitschko brothers, a Golden Boy-implemented USADA-like testing plan would assure the world that everything is on the up and up.
Will Golden Boy take the lead in across-the-board PED testing?
My guess is that there’s a better chance of Tiger Woods becoming Pope."
Crap article, biased, uneducated (I won't go into that I'll be typing all day) and from an obvious Pac Fan
This guy should go and work for Fox news.
If ANY athlete (Hopkins, Haye, klitscho, Pacquiao, blah blah blah) has nothing to hide they won't mind doing a test. In fact in sport that i've been involved in the best athletes jumped at the chance to do a test and prove they were clean....
I don't care who the fighter is. If they refuse testing (and to my knowledge, Haye, Klitscho, Hopkins etel have not publicly refused testing) then they look suspisious. And if you fail a test then harsh penalties should be served.
It's clear as day for me with no gray area.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Yeah to me it is a weak defense to say that there is no reason to say that Pac is being unfairly singled out and therefore he shouldn't take the test. Hopkins, Haye, those guys haven't refused tests to my knowledge. As an athlete, the onus is on you to be as transparent as possible about testing and if not you run the risk of incriminating yourself. I don't know either way but the doubt is there and that's Pacquiao's fault.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
amat
Yeah to me it is a weak defense to say that there is no reason to say that Pac is being unfairly singled out and therefore he shouldn't take the test. Hopkins, Haye, those guys haven't refused tests to my knowledge. As an athlete, the onus is on you to be as transparent as possible about testing and if not you run the risk of incriminating yourself. I don't know either way but the doubt is there and that's Pacquiao's fault.
We definately see this the same way my friend.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
The drug testing demand of Floyd has been a public relations disaster for both Team Mayweather & Team Pacquiao. They both could have handled it differently. Team Mayweather could have come up with the statement that Floyd wants blood drug testing to be implemented in any of his future fights & would insist that the Nevada Boxing Commission come up with the terms of such blood test (so that it does not appear like he is dictating the terms of such drug test) or Team Pacquiao comes out with a statement that they're agreeable to blood drug testing but would want the Commission to dictate the terms & they would abide by such terms (so that it doesn't appear like Manny is hiding something & it would not allow Floyd to dictate the terms) . This puts the ball in the hands of the Commisssion. Public outcry & Commissions desire to have the megafight in their city would have made them act on those request.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
That is just like an educator to state the obvious. It's common sense and not the behavior of someone with something to hide. Not only that, it's not an accurate scenario. If my neighbor was shot to death, why the hell would I let the neighbor watch go through my house to look for a gun when I don't even fukn own one. Besides, as a boxer, I would have beat his ass to death rather than shoot him. I'd tell their dumb ass to go to the police and ask them to get a search warrant.
You are a truly god-awful poster. So you attack his profession, even if his points are better than yours, particularly his 'inaccurate' scenario, which is far more feasible than the garbled one you put up.
I assume you mean the neighbourhood watch, but they generally don't take on investigations in instances of murder, the police do. Now if the police had truly inefficient methods of investigating, then would you object if the family of the victim hired a more effective private investigator and do you not think not allowing him into your home might make you look suspicious? Why would you not allow him to look for a gun that was not used in the murder if you were innocent?
Your sentence about you being a boxer indicates that you're someone who almost certainly doesn't box, because if you did you wouldn't feel the need to hype yourself as some kind of tough guy with it. You can tell most of the people who box on here because they don't feel the need to mention it to indicate what hard men or women they are. That or you are just a gigantic douche who likes picking on people less able to defend themselves.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
So, If he wasn't afraid to make the fight, what do you call it?
Again, Garbeled logic. You claim that we cannot judge Manny based on his refusal to take the test, and in the very stream of thought judge that PBF is scared to fight Manny because he advocated that they both be amenable to a testing regimine that can be applied randomly. Like I said in many previous posts, the quality of logical discussion on boxing has been degraded down several levels by the acrobatic linguistics of MP sycophants. Their visceral hatred for PBF has created a kind of madness that makes logic elusive in their efforts to make him the devil and Manny the angel. But that is history, the PBF always become the devil for those who envy their prowess and reject their right to be assertive.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JJson
Quote:
So, If he wasn't afraid to make the fight, what do you call it?
Again, Garbeled logic. You claim that we cannot judge Manny based on his refusal to take the test, and in the very stream of thought judge that PBF is scared to fight Manny because he advocated that they both be amenable to a testing regimine that can be applied randomly. Like I said in many previous posts, the quality of logical discussion on boxing has been degraded down several levels by the acrobatic linguistics of MP sycophants. Their visceral hatred for PBF has created a kind of madness that makes logic elusive in their efforts to make him the devil and Manny the angel. But that is history, the PBF always become the devil for those who envy their prowess and reject their right to be assertive.
Great post
Both fighters made their demands.
Why wasn't Pacquiao chastized when he called for $10,000,000 for every pound over weight? Pac's team did this either to play head games, ensure an even fight or hope that Floyd wouldn't go for it and not except the fight.
Floyd made his demands. He did this to either play head games, ensure an even fight or hope that Pac wouldn't go for it and not except the fight.
They are both as good/bad as each other depending how you look at it.
My personal opinion though is I don't care who the athlete is but if you're at the top of your sport earning this kind of money you shouldn't be refusing testing.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sanj16
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sanj16
If someone won't take the test, how are you meant to prove they are cheating? Everyone agree that PED's are probably a problem in boxing. Where better to change the standard than in the biggest fight in history?
It is precisely because PBF is facing "a very live, very dangerous opponent" that he is demanding more stringent testing. What is wrong with that.
If you were going into this fight with your entire reputation and legacy on the line against someone you thought may be on PED's, you wouldn't want to use the test that would prevent him from using, or would you just go i there anyway?
As for the idea that Manny doesn't want to give him the upper hand! If I was going into a fight and my opponent said that I was so good that the only explanation was that I was on PEDs, that would be a huge boost to my confidence. I get the advantage by saying I'll test anytime any where, unless I was............
Hell I could have won the Nobel prize in Maths but I just didn't want to go that way. Because I didn't, you can't prove that I couldn't have.
Sorry the burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused. I can say that you like to touch little kids like Michael Jackson and Gary Glitter and that if you don't take this pedophile test then you are guilty is not proof especially if you weren't suspected of it before.;D
BTW I'm still waiting for emails that said Pacquiao tested dirty and wanted to cover it up. I'm still waiting for these so called hard evidence. So where is it? It's been practically a month already. Can you answer me?
For a while I thought maybe the guy is on something, then it dawn on me that most of this shit was hearsay rumors like the emails and Floyds dad starting the rumors because his fighter Hatton got sparked out in 2 rounds.
If your doing something extreme and arn't will to rule out the obvious then people will start talking. Using your very own example, if your child's baby sitter has been strongly accused of of being a paedo and everyone is talking about it. If there was a test that they could take, say a lie detector, that would show that they are innocent, and they refused for whatever reason, would you leave your kids with them?
I work in the ED, and if someone is accused of alcohol or drug taking and they refuse a test, then they are viewed to be guilty.
Anyone coming in following an MVA gets a blood alcohol level, even if they deny drinking or have never failed a alcohol test before
So what Pacquiao doing is extreme in boxing? Do you know your boxing history? So what Ray Robinson, Armstrong, Ted Kid Lewis were doing were extreme? How about a modern great like Duran? Ever seen his fights with Moore and Barkley? What weight did Duran start at? How about 122.
BTW, you never answered me this question. Where is the hardcore evidence against Pacquiao? Not hearsay rumors, not innuendo, but hardcore evidence. As in someone in his camp with testimonial evidence. Physical evidence with needles lying around. And oh yeah what happened to the emails that Teddy Atlas reported as fact that Pacqiao and his people asked Mayweather to cover up for him to save boxing.
So where are the emails? Surely if let's say the New York Times can uncover things like the Pentagon Papers with regards to the Vietnam War surely they can come up with emails that the sports biggest draw was asking people to cover up his dirty drug secrets. Teddy Atlas reported that a reporter of teh NY Times saw the emails. The NY Times has a very strong reputation when it comes to journalistic integrity.
So let me ask again. Where are the emails? Where is the hard evidence? (I have a feeling another bullshit excuse is on the way)
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
InTheNeutralCorner
The drug testing demand of Floyd has been a public relations disaster for both Team Mayweather & Team Pacquiao. They both could have handled it differently. Team Mayweather could have come up with the statement that Floyd wants blood drug testing to be implemented in any of his future fights & would insist that the Nevada Boxing Commission come up with the terms of such blood test (so that it does not appear like he is dictating the terms of such drug test) or Team Pacquiao comes out with a statement that they're agreeable to blood drug testing but would want the Commission to dictate the terms & they would abide by such terms (so that it doesn't appear like Manny is hiding something & it would not allow Floyd to dictate the terms) . This puts the ball in the hands of the Commisssion. Public outcry & Commissions desire to have the megafight in their city would have made them act on those request.
anyone who has common sense must be thinking the same.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sanj16
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Sorry the burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused. I can say that you like to touch little kids like Michael Jackson and Gary Glitter and that if you don't take this pedophile test then you are guilty is not proof especially if you weren't suspected of it before.;D
BTW I'm still waiting for emails that said Pacquiao tested dirty and wanted to cover it up. I'm still waiting for these so called hard evidence. So where is it? It's been practically a month already. Can you answer me?
For a while I thought maybe the guy is on something, then it dawn on me that most of this shit was hearsay rumors like the emails and Floyds dad starting the rumors because his fighter Hatton got sparked out in 2 rounds.
If your doing something extreme and arn't will to rule out the obvious then people will start talking. Using your very own example, if your child's baby sitter has been strongly accused of of being a paedo and everyone is talking about it. If there was a test that they could take, say a lie detector, that would show that they are innocent, and they refused for whatever reason, would you leave your kids with them?
I work in the ED, and if someone is accused of alcohol or drug taking and they refuse a test, then they are viewed to be guilty.
Anyone coming in following an MVA gets a blood alcohol level, even if they deny drinking or have never failed a alcohol test before
So what Pacquiao doing is extreme in boxing? Do you know your boxing history? So what Ray Robinson, Armstrong, Ted Kid Lewis were doing were extreme? How about a modern great like Duran? Ever seen his fights with Moore and Barkley? What weight did Duran start at? How about 122.
BTW, you never answered me this question. Where is the hardcore evidence against Pacquiao? Not hearsay rumors, not innuendo, but hardcore evidence. As in someone in his camp with testimonial evidence. Physical evidence with needles lying around. And oh yeah
what happened to the emails that Teddy Atlas reported as fact that Pacqiao and his people asked Mayweather to cover up for him to save boxing.
So where are the emails? Surely if let's say the New York Times can uncover things like the Pentagon Papers with regards to the Vietnam War surely they can come up with emails that the sports biggest draw was asking people to cover up his dirty drug secrets. Teddy Atlas reported that a reporter of teh NY Times saw the emails. The NY Times has a very strong reputation when it comes to journalistic integrity.
So let me ask again. Where are the emails? Where is the hard evidence? (I have a feeling another bullshit excuse is on the way)
Atlas probably deleted it after their SysAd learned that the IP trace reveals that the IP Address was from Michigan. :D
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
Quote:
Originally Posted by
InTheNeutralCorner
The drug testing demand of Floyd has been a public relations disaster for both Team Mayweather & Team Pacquiao. They both could have handled it differently. Team Mayweather could have come up with the statement that Floyd wants blood drug testing to be implemented in any of his future fights & would insist that the Nevada Boxing Commission come up with the terms of such blood test (so that it does not appear like he is dictating the terms of such drug test) or Team Pacquiao comes out with a statement that they're agreeable to blood drug testing but would want the Commission to dictate the terms & they would abide by such terms (so that it doesn't appear like Manny is hiding something & it would not allow Floyd to dictate the terms) . This puts the ball in the hands of the Commisssion. Public outcry & Commissions desire to have the megafight in their city would have made them act on those request.
anyone who has common sense must be thinking the same.
Your the last person who should be telling people what common sense is, considering how ridiculously biased and irrational you are.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
Quote:
Originally Posted by
InTheNeutralCorner
The drug testing demand of Floyd has been a public relations disaster for both Team Mayweather & Team Pacquiao. They both could have handled it differently. Team Mayweather could have come up with the statement that Floyd wants blood drug testing to be implemented in any of his future fights & would insist that the Nevada Boxing Commission come up with the terms of such blood test (so that it does not appear like he is dictating the terms of such drug test) or Team Pacquiao comes out with a statement that they're agreeable to blood drug testing but would want the Commission to dictate the terms & they would abide by such terms (so that it doesn't appear like Manny is hiding something & it would not allow Floyd to dictate the terms) . This puts the ball in the hands of the Commisssion. Public outcry & Commissions desire to have the megafight in their city would have made them act on those request.
anyone who has common sense must be thinking the same.
Your the last person who should be telling people what common sense is, considering how ridiculously biased and irrational you are.
You're talking out of your ass here.
Bias? Irrational?
I support Pac you hate him just live with it.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
anyone who has common sense must be thinking the same.
Your the last person who should be telling people what common sense is, considering how ridiculously biased and irrational you are.
You're talking out of your ass here.
Bias? Irrational?
I support Pac you hate him just live with it.
I dont hate Pac at all, i do not like a lot of his Pactard supporters such as yourself. Common sense would tell anyone that a guy walking away from a 40 million + payday all due to not wanting to take random drug tests seems a bit suspicious. Surely even the most deluded fan of Pac would agree that i seemed a very strange move?
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
That is just like an educator to state the obvious. It's common sense and not the behavior of someone with something to hide. Not only that, it's not an accurate scenario. If my neighbor was shot to death, why the hell would I let the neighbor watch go through my house to look for a gun when I don't even fukn own one. Besides, as a boxer, I would have beat his ass to death rather than shoot him. I'd tell their dumb ass to go to the police and ask them to get a search warrant.
You are a truly god-awful poster. So you attack his profession, even if his points are better than yours, particularly his 'inaccurate' scenario, which is far more feasible than the garbled one you put up.
I assume you mean the neighbourhood watch,
but they generally don't take on investigations in instances of murder, the police do.
Now if the police had truly inefficient methods of investigating, then would you object if the family of the victim hired a more effective private investigator and do you not think not allowing him into your home might make you look suspicious? Why would you not allow him to look for a gun that was not used in the murder if you were innocent?
Your sentence about you being a boxer indicates that you're someone who almost certainly doesn't box, because if you did you wouldn't feel the need to hype yourself as some kind of tough guy with it. You can tell most of the people who box on here because they don't feel the need to mention it to indicate what hard men or women they are. That or you are just a gigantic douche who likes picking on people less able to defend themselves.
If you weren't so busy looking for pactards to argue with, you might notice the correlation you so moronically point out. i.e. "Mayweather" and the "Neighborhood watch" yank spelling not Brit. and the "police" being the "commission". I was being contemptuous with the rest of it. :rolleyes:
I take it your one of those fools that beleive guns kill people or that speed kills. Hell you might even blame the pen for failing those tests.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Your the last person who should be telling people what common sense is, considering how ridiculously biased and irrational you are.
You're talking out of your ass here.
Bias? Irrational?
I support Pac you hate him just live with it.
I dont hate Pac at all, i do not like a lot of his Pactard supporters such as yourself. Common sense would tell anyone that a guy walking away from a 40 million + payday all due to not wanting to take random drug tests seems a bit suspicious. Surely even the most deluded fan of Pac would agree that i seemed a very strange move?
If you can provide a link of my post that would say that pac is correct or right in refusing the test then i will admit that you are correct.
But it seems that you need common sense to understand what im saying. Im just stating 'reasons' why pac didnt take the test. You might find it very hard to understand maybe because it needs common sense ;)
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
That is just like an educator to state the obvious. It's common sense and not the behavior of someone with something to hide. Not only that, it's not an accurate scenario. If my neighbor was shot to death, why the hell would I let the neighbor watch go through my house to look for a gun when I don't even fukn own one. Besides, as a boxer, I would have beat his ass to death rather than shoot him. I'd tell their dumb ass to go to the police and ask them to get a search warrant.
You are a truly god-awful poster. So you attack his profession, even if his points are better than yours, particularly his 'inaccurate' scenario, which is far more feasible than the garbled one you put up.
I assume you mean the neighbourhood watch,
but they generally don't take on investigations in instances of murder, the police do.
Now if the police had truly inefficient methods of investigating, then would you object if the family of the victim hired a more effective private investigator and do you not think not allowing him into your home might make you look suspicious? Why would you not allow him to look for a gun that was not used in the murder if you were innocent?
Your sentence about you being a boxer indicates that you're someone who almost certainly doesn't box, because if you did you wouldn't feel the need to hype yourself as some kind of tough guy with it. You can tell most of the people who box on here because they don't feel the need to mention it to indicate what hard men or women they are. That or you are just a gigantic douche who likes picking on people less able to defend themselves.
If you weren't so busy looking for pactards to argue with, you might notice the correlation you so moronically point out. i.e. "Mayweather" and the "Neighborhood watch" yank spelling not Brit. and the "police" being the "commission". I was being contemptuous with the rest of it. :rolleyes:
I take it your one of those fools that beleive guns kill people or that speed kills. Hell you might even blame the pen for failing those tests.
I don't need to look for Pactards to argue with, I was well aware of the analogy, hence why I drew it. You of course chose to completely ignore any questions raised by it, instead trying to divert the topic onto something else.
As for your last paragraph, yes guns clearly do kill people when in the hands of an idiot, as does speed when in a car driven by an incapable driver. Although none of that has anything to do with what we're talking about. Oh and I've never failed any tests, and unless you have a PhD (which I'm sure you now will :rolleyes:), I will have an education at least equal to yours if not better.
Again, none of that has anything to do with the topic, which seems to be your aim when you can't deal with difficult questions. Just try and slander them personally and see if you can change the issue, rather than deal with any difficult points raised.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
You're talking out of your ass here.
Bias? Irrational?
I support Pac you hate him just live with it.
I dont hate Pac at all, i do not like a lot of his Pactard supporters such as yourself. Common sense would tell anyone that a guy walking away from a 40 million + payday all due to not wanting to take random drug tests seems a bit suspicious. Surely even the most deluded fan of Pac would agree that i seemed a very strange move?
If you can provide a link of my post that would say that pac is correct or right in refusing the test then i will admit that you are correct.
But it seems that you need common sense to understand what im saying. Im just stating 'reasons' why pac didnt take the test. You might find it very hard to understand maybe because it needs common sense ;)
the reasons Pacman said are the purest bullshit I've ever seen "I'll become weak" "needle superstition thing", come on, I have had 20 bloodtests once in the same damn day and I was feeling top shape, this argument or weakening is just ludicrously mediocre, Pac never gave other arguments for it.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
I dont hate Pac at all, i do not like a lot of his Pactard supporters such as yourself. Common sense would tell anyone that a guy walking away from a 40 million + payday all due to not wanting to take random drug tests seems a bit suspicious. Surely even the most deluded fan of Pac would agree that i seemed a very strange move?
If you can provide a link of my post that would say that pac is correct or right in refusing the test then i will admit that you are correct.
But it seems that you need common sense to understand what im saying. Im just stating 'reasons' why pac didnt take the test. You might find it very hard to understand maybe because it needs common sense ;)
the reasons Pacman said are the purest bullshit I've ever seen "I'll become weak" "needle superstition thing", come on, I have had 20 bloodtests once in the same damn day and I was feeling top shape, this argument or weakening is just ludicrously mediocre, Pac never gave other arguments for it.
Can you imagine if the boot was on the other foot and Floyd wasn't agreeing to mayweathers demands and refusing testing? Pac fans would be going mental. They'd be calling him coward, cheat and the rest of it.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
I dont hate Pac at all, i do not like a lot of his Pactard supporters such as yourself. Common sense would tell anyone that a guy walking away from a 40 million + payday all due to not wanting to take random drug tests seems a bit suspicious. Surely even the most deluded fan of Pac would agree that i seemed a very strange move?
If you can provide a link of my post that would say that pac is correct or right in refusing the test then i will admit that you are correct.
But it seems that you need common sense to understand what im saying. Im just stating 'reasons' why pac didnt take the test. You might find it very hard to understand maybe because it needs common sense ;)
the reasons Pacman said are the purest bullshit I've ever seen "I'll become weak" "needle superstition thing", come on, I have had 20 bloodtests once in the same damn day and I was feeling top shape, this argument or weakening is just ludicrously mediocre, Pac never gave other arguments for it.
They were weak excuses from Pacquiao. But I'm still waiting for the smoking gun. Where is the hard evidence? Especially the Emails from the NY Times that Teddy Atlas reported. If the NY Times can print the Pentagon Papers surely they can print Emails that boxing's biggest draw is a cheat? No one has answered this question. Any physical evidence? ANy testimonial evidence? I'm still waiting. Not hearsay, not innuendo, but hard evidence.
So I'm still waiting for the emails from the New York Times. That is hard evidence.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Atlas could be senile for all anyone knows, who knows if those emails are legit. What is legit is Pacquiao obviously pussy-footing around with the testing. Talk to any expert on the subject of testing, and they don't need to know boxing to know Pacquiao is hiding something.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greig
Hauser excels himself yet again. The man tells it like it is :o
Boxing - Thomas Hauser - Mayweather-Pacquiao, PEDs, and Boxing
"Golden Boy can take the lead on the issue of PEDs in boxing and become a beacon of integrity by requiring its fighters to submit to Olympic-style drug testing before each major fight. And in order to fight on a Golden Boy card (remember; Golden Boy has a lot of dates on HBO), it could require opponents to do the same.
In fact, Golden Boy could start by testing Shane Mosley to protect Shane from unknowingly using PEDs again. It’s interesting how Shane looked very old when he fought Ricardo Mayorga in 2008 and then improved with age when he fought Antonio Margarito in 2009.
And speaking of age; let’s have a round of applause for another Golden Boy fighter; Bernard Hopkins. People talk a lot about what great shape Bernard is in and how remarkable it is that a fighter well into his forties can perform the way he does.
I consider Hopkins a great fighter. Other fighters have moved up in weight and excelled in the manner of Manny Pacquiao. But there is no precedent for a fighter performing as agelessly as Bernard has. I’m aware of no proof whatsoever that Hopkins has used illegal performance enhancing drugs at any time in his career. Of course, to my knowledge, Bernard hasn’t undergone USADA testing.
WBA heavyweight champion David Haye is another Golden Boy fighter. David was a cruiserweight less than two years ago. His body has filled out nicely since then. Very nicely. Now Haye wants to fight Vitali and Wladimir Klitschko. Vitali tested positive for a banned substance while training for the 1996 Olympics and was removed from the Ukrainian national team. He later acknowledged using steroids, saying that he had done so after aggravating an old leg injury previously sustained during a kick-boxing bout. Wladimir’s body is even more imposing than Vitali’s.
If Haye fights one of the Klitschko brothers, a Golden Boy-implemented USADA-like testing plan would assure the world that everything is on the up and up.
Will Golden Boy take the lead in across-the-board PED testing?
My guess is that there’s a better chance of Tiger Woods becoming Pope."
Ok so I guess we should now look at where all this started. Mosley has no problem taking a random test, as a matter of fact a MORE strict test than the 14 day cut-off Mayweather's final negotiation was with Pacquiao. Mayweather (regardless of why) is going to require this of all future opponents.
-
Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miron_lang
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
I dont hate Pac at all, i do not like a lot of his Pactard supporters such as yourself. Common sense would tell anyone that a guy walking away from a 40 million + payday all due to not wanting to take random drug tests seems a bit suspicious. Surely even the most deluded fan of Pac would agree that i seemed a very strange move?
If you can provide a link of my post that would say that pac is correct or right in refusing the test then i will admit that you are correct.
But it seems that you need common sense to understand what im saying. Im just stating 'reasons' why pac didnt take the test. You might find it very hard to understand maybe because it needs common sense ;)
the reasons Pacman said are the purest bullshit I've ever seen "I'll become weak" "needle superstition thing", come on, I have had 20 bloodtests once in the same damn day and I was feeling top shape, this argument or weakening is just ludicrously mediocre, Pac never gave other arguments for it.
1st
let me say that i want Pac to take the test so that we'll have our super fight.
2nd.
I agree that when Pac and company open their mouths it got worse for them.
3rd.
Jimmy G's opening post covers everything from a neutral point of view w/c i think is the exact case.
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...ny-debate.html
