Last edited by miron_lang; 02-01-2010 at 04:11 AM.
I dont hate Pac at all, i do not like a lot of his Pactard supporters such as yourself. Common sense would tell anyone that a guy walking away from a 40 million + payday all due to not wanting to take random drug tests seems a bit suspicious. Surely even the most deluded fan of Pac would agree that i seemed a very strange move?
If you can provide a link of my post that would say that pac is correct or right in refusing the test then i will admit that you are correct.
But it seems that you need common sense to understand what im saying. Im just stating 'reasons' why pac didnt take the test. You might find it very hard to understand maybe because it needs common sense![]()
the reasons Pacman said are the purest bullshit I've ever seen "I'll become weak" "needle superstition thing", come on, I have had 20 bloodtests once in the same damn day and I was feeling top shape, this argument or weakening is just ludicrously mediocre, Pac never gave other arguments for it.
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
They were weak excuses from Pacquiao. But I'm still waiting for the smoking gun. Where is the hard evidence? Especially the Emails from the NY Times that Teddy Atlas reported. If the NY Times can print the Pentagon Papers surely they can print Emails that boxing's biggest draw is a cheat? No one has answered this question. Any physical evidence? ANy testimonial evidence? I'm still waiting. Not hearsay, not innuendo, but hard evidence.
So I'm still waiting for the emails from the New York Times. That is hard evidence.
Atlas could be senile for all anyone knows, who knows if those emails are legit. What is legit is Pacquiao obviously pussy-footing around with the testing. Talk to any expert on the subject of testing, and they don't need to know boxing to know Pacquiao is hiding something.
1st
let me say that i want Pac to take the test so that we'll have our super fight.
2nd.
I agree that when Pac and company open their mouths it got worse for them.
3rd.
Jimmy G's opening post covers everything from a neutral point of view w/c i think is the exact case.
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...ny-debate.html
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks