Wladimir Klitschko is taking Tyson Fury to court over violation of contract

Tyson didnt test positive, the others did you moron;D:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Tyson didnt test positive, the others did you moron;D:rolleyes:

---

Roll your eyes until they fall out of your fool fucking head. Tyson Fury tested positive if he hadn't THIS Tyson Fury To Take On UKAD Over Drug Test Results - Boxing News wouldn't be a thing would it?

Yeah, that Fury boy looks like a REAL peach don't he? Just honest as the day is longTyson Fury: World heavyweight champion faces UK Anti-Doping charge - BBC Sport

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQveng3Wxz8

This
"UK Anti-Doping can confirm that both boxers (Tyson and Hughie Fury) were charged on 24 June, 2016 with presence of a prohibited substance."

and

This
"Tyson didnt test positive"


Are mutually exclusive statements meaning that they cannot both be right

For fuck sakes they are both right!

He did have higher than normal levels of nadrolone which is a naturally occuring substance anyway. He didnt have high enough to test positive which means it wasnt a positive test.

Fuck me this is embarrasing watching you cling with all youv got for dear life hoping it will in some way reverse how easily Tyson out maneuvered and out boxed your hero, like some kind of saviour for Klitschkos career;D

Do you not remember how easy I said it would be? And it was wasnt it. I never said ztyson wasnt going to need some kind of special performance we have never seen. I said these actual words that you lot couldnt see the wood for the trees that what Tyson does well would leave Klitscko standing. It wasnt out of the ordinary, it wasnt Klitschko suddenly getting older. It was Tyson Fury being too good for Wladimir Klitschko;)

If Tyson had tested positive which he didnt you know full well he wouldnt have got anywhere near a title challenge and pointing out Povetkin proves my point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

For fuck sakes they are both right!

He did have higher than normal levels of nadrolone which is a naturally occuring substance anyway. He didnt have high enough to test positive which means it wasnt a positive test.

Fuck me this is embarrasing watching you cling with all youv got for dear life hoping it will in some way reverse how easily Tyson out maneuvered and out boxed your hero, like some kind of saviour for Klitschkos career;D

Do you not remember how easy I said it would be? And it was wasnt it. I never said ztyson wasnt going to need some kind of special performance we have never seen. I said these actual words that you lot couldnt see the wood for the trees that what Tyson does well would leave Klitscko standing. It wasnt out of the ordinary, it wasnt Klitschko suddenly getting older. It was Tyson Fury being too good for Wladimir Klitschko;)

If Tyson had tested positive which he didnt you know full well he wouldnt have got anywhere near a title challenge and pointing out Povetkin proves my point.

---

Aww honey, I hate to break it to you puddin' pop but no, both of those statements are NOT right.

Now you say "nadrolone which is a naturally occuring [sic] substance anyway." and that is true, it's true just like cannabinoids which are found in marijuana are also found in the human body....naturally. Yet this doesn't mean that smoking pot is not "doing drugs".....do you understand? Well if you don't, oh and I believe you don't hahaha get this Nandrolone is and I quote "ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR ANABOLIC STEROIDS TO EVER BE CREATED" https://www.steroid.com/Nandrolone.php


Tyson Fury is a cheat ross and you are pathetic, but then again we've all known that for quite a while.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

---

If Wlad retired and therefore did not invoke the rematch clause the titles would not have split and cheap holders would not have been champions.

---

who are cheap holders? are you suggesting Joshua is a "Cheap Holder" of a World Title?

---

Yes and you know it is true.

---

with the exception of Wlad, who has Fury beaten that's better than Dillian Whyte, Charles Martin and Brezeale ?
While you're at it , tell me who Wilder has beaten that's better?
Still a cheap holder is he?

---

And who had Charles Martin and Breazeale beaten?

Breazeale was lucky he was awarded a decision against Fred Kassi who Hughie Fury was toying with till he got cut. Martin was lucky ato be in the right place st the right time when Glazkovs knee went because he didnt do much there either.

Dillian Whyte hasnt done anything above British level yet, in fact he got knocked out in his first try. You are saying they are all good just on association because Joshua must be good because Sky and Hearn tell you so.

---

Yeah , very good . But none of that answers my questions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

For fuck sakes they are both right!

He did have higher than normal levels of nadrolone which is a naturally occuring substance anyway. He didnt have high enough to test positive which means it wasnt a positive test.

Fuck me this is embarrasing watching you cling with all youv got for dear life hoping it will in some way reverse how easily Tyson out maneuvered and out boxed your hero, like some kind of saviour for Klitschkos career;D

Do you not remember how easy I said it would be? And it was wasnt it. I never said ztyson wasnt going to need some kind of special performance we have never seen. I said these actual words that you lot couldnt see the wood for the trees that what Tyson does well would leave Klitscko standing. It wasnt out of the ordinary, it wasnt Klitschko suddenly getting older. It was Tyson Fury being too good for Wladimir Klitschko;)

If Tyson had tested positive which he didnt you know full well he wouldnt have got anywhere near a title challenge and pointing out Povetkin proves my point.

---

Aww honey, I hate to break it to you puddin' pop but no, both of those statements are NOT right.

Now you say "nadrolone which is a naturally occuring [sic] substance anyway." and that is true, it's true just like cannabinoids which are found in marijuana are also found in the human body....naturally. Yet this doesn't mean that smoking pot is not "doing drugs".....do you understand? Well if you don't, oh and I believe you don't hahaha get this Nandrolone is and I quote "ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR ANABOLIC STEROIDS TO EVER BE CREATED" https://www.steroid.com/Nandrolone.php


Tyson Fury is a cheat ross and you are pathetic, but then again we've all known that for quite a while.

---

You getting more cringe worthy with each post.

If thats what you need to cling to to keep you posting and that little flicker of Klitschko hope alve inside you then so be it. Carry on regardless that Tyson tested negative;D

It wont change the fact that Tyson beat Klitschko with skill, not brute strength, power or ever ready batteries juiced up to the eyeballs.

You will come to earth with a bump though when you stop deluding yourself and remember this embarassing rubbish your posting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

---

If Wlad retired and therefore did not invoke the rematch clause the titles would not have split and cheap holders would not have been champions.

---

who are cheap holders? are you suggesting Joshua is a "Cheap Holder" of a World Title?

---

Joshua is no longer the IBF belt holder , now the evidence that David Price knocked him down in sparring when Joshua was an amateur , Price has been awarded the title.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

---

If Wlad retired and therefore did not invoke the rematch clause the titles would not have split and cheap holders would not have been champions.

---

who are cheap holders? are you suggesting Joshua is a "Cheap Holder" of a World Title?

---

Yes and you know it is true.

---

with the exception of Wlad, who has Fury beaten that's better than Dillian Whyte, Charles Martin and Brezeale ?
While you're at it , tell me who Wilder has beaten that's better?
Still a cheap holder is he?

---

Primo your post get dumber. Fury beat the undisputed champion. That is as much as you can do to be the true champion. Stop the AJ and Eddie love.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

---

If Wlad retired and therefore did not invoke the rematch clause the titles would not have split and cheap holders would not have been champions.

---

who are cheap holders? are you suggesting Joshua is a "Cheap Holder" of a World Title?

---

Yes and you know it is true.

---

with the exception of Wlad, who has Fury beaten that's better than Dillian Whyte, Charles Martin and Brezeale ?
While you're at it , tell me who Wilder has beaten that's better?
Still a cheap holder is he?

---

Primo your post get dumber. Fury beat the undisputed champion. That is as much as you can do to be the true champion. Stop the AJ and Eddie love.

---

Yep, and you, like Ross didn't answer the question.
Here's another one. How many current HW's at this moment in time beat Joshua? Name them please.
It's not that I think AJ is the greatest or anything like that, he's got his faults, but the FACT is that there isn't much out there, and consequently he deserves to be where he is.

I do not care how many fighters I think can beat the hype machine that Sky have created. AJ is a paper champion until he beats Fury. AJ is just a contender.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I do not care how many fighters I think can beat the hype machine that Sky have created. AJ is a paper champion until he beats Fury. AJ is just a contender.

---

Master , your hypocrisy is embarrassing.;D;D;D AJ is a paper champion because he hasn't fought Fury, yet people like BJS, Lee, Ricky Burns , and other Brits that you've swallowed bullshit sandwiches about are or have been worthy Champions!!!
And answer the question about how many can beat AJ, because if the answer is not many, if any, then he is not a hype machine.
Stop embarrassing yourself mate. ;D

Who could beat Joshua?

Potentially all of them.

Fury, Klitschko, Wilder, Povetkin, Haye, Ortiz.

All could beat him realistically.:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Who could beat Joshua?

Potentially all of them.

Fury, Klitschko, Wilder, Povetkin, Haye, Ortiz.

All could beat him realistically.:rolleyes:

---

Fuck me I agree with Ross!

The first two could do a smother fest, the remainder could spark him in one of his hesitant moments. If Eddie can get to the other sanctioning bodies then he holds the Aces if Joshua improves through a couple of warm up 'opponents'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nuggetdotcom

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Who could beat Joshua?

Potentially all of them.

Fury, Klitschko, Wilder, Povetkin, Haye, Ortiz.

All could beat him realistically.:rolleyes:

---

Fuck me I agree with Ross!

The first two could do a smother fest, the remainder could spark him in one of his hesitant moments. If Eddie can get to the other sanctioning bodies then he holds the Aces if Joshua improves through a couple of warm up 'opponents'.

---

It's all well and good saying "potentially ", but potentially he could beat them all, and potentially they could all beat Fury as well.
What I'm saying is that he's done as much as anyone opponent wise except of course Wlad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nuggetdotcom

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Who could beat Joshua?

Potentially all of them.

Fury, Klitschko, Wilder, Povetkin, Haye, Ortiz.

All could beat him realistically.:rolleyes:

---

Fuck me I agree with Ross!

The first two could do a smother fest, the remainder could spark him in one of his hesitant moments. If Eddie can get to the other sanctioning bodies then he holds the Aces if Joshua improves through a couple of warm up 'opponents'.

---

It's all well and good saying "potentially ", but potentially he could beat them all, and potentially they could all beat Fury as well.
What I'm saying is that he's done as much as anyone opponent wise except of course Wlad.

---

You are of course right, a boxer can do no more than beat all his opponents, the fact that he still gets trashed by supporters of other unbeaten boxers is all part of lifes rich tapestry. Of the unbeaten ones I think its 50/50 AJ Wilder, either of those beat Tyson. Furys problem is now getting a fight, he is in danger of getting frozen out, as I say Eddie is calling the shots.

Anyone? Any ideas how its possible for Fury to be in breach/violation of contract at this point in time?

Surely money and testing would have been outlined in the contract they have signed? Unless he misses a contractually agreed testing date he's good right.

Unless the contract states you cant ask for any changes to the financial arrangements Fury is welcome to say he wants whatever he likes isnt he? He puts any requests forward to a lawyer, who presents them to a lawyer for Wlad, who presents them to Wlad, Wlad says get fucked.

Something dodgy going on here.

I think what iv read was that the arena in Dusseldorf was said to be full which is 55,000 but Boente is saying they only had 36,000. So Tyson must have been getting paid based on the attendance and they are trying to short change him?

Maybe this is why they wanted the rematch in the UK so the attendance can be checked?

All boils down to Wlad not really wanting the fight.

We all know Hearn and Boente will have been discussing a potential Joshua v Klitschko fight. I couldnt see that fight happening though because it would mean having to pay theough the nose for Klitschko. Theres still a few undefeated useless americans that will take a paycheck yet.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

I think what iv read was that the arena in Dusseldorf was said to be full which is 55,000 but Boente is saying they only had 36,000. So Tyson must have been getting paid based on the attendance and they are trying to short change him?

Maybe this is why they wanted the rematch in the UK so the attendance can be checked?

All boils down to Wlad not really wanting the fight.

We all know Hearn and Boente will have been discussing a potential Joshua v Klitschko fight. I couldnt see that fight happening though because it would mean having to pay theough the nose for Klitschko. Theres still a few undefeated useless americans that will take a paycheck yet.

---

Mate, If Fury v Wlad doesn't happen , I'd be more concerned about who Tyson fights next rather than who AJ fights if I were you.;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

I think what iv read was that the arena in Dusseldorf was said to be full which is 55,000 but Boente is saying they only had 36,000. So Tyson must have been getting paid based on the attendance and they are trying to short change him?

Maybe this is why they wanted the rematch in the UK so the attendance can be checked?

All boils down to Wlad not really wanting the fight.

We all know Hearn and Boente will have been discussing a potential Joshua v Klitschko fight. I couldnt see that fight happening though because it would mean having to pay theough the nose for Klitschko. Theres still a few undefeated useless americans that will take a paycheck yet.

---

Mate, If Fury v Wlad doesn't happen , I'd be more concerned about who Tyson fights next rather than who AJ fights if I were you.;D

---

Why would I be concerned? Tyson will beat whoever it is:confused:

Maybe he could go for Wilder and Joshuas murderers row of defences?;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

I think what iv read was that the arena in Dusseldorf was said to be full which is 55,000 but Boente is saying they only had 36,000. So Tyson must have been getting paid based on the attendance and they are trying to short change him?

Maybe this is why they wanted the rematch in the UK so the attendance can be checked?

All boils down to Wlad not really wanting the fight.

We all know Hearn and Boente will have been discussing a potential Joshua v Klitschko fight. I couldnt see that fight happening though because it would mean having to pay theough the nose for Klitschko. Theres still a few undefeated useless americans that will take a paycheck yet.

---

Mate, If Fury v Wlad doesn't happen , I'd be more concerned about who Tyson fights next rather than who AJ fights if I were you.;D

---

Why would I be concerned? Tyson will beat whoever it is:confused:

Maybe he could go for Wilder and Joshuas murderers row of defences?;D

---

I'm not saying it from a point of view of whether he wins or not, that's another debate altogether. I'm saying it from an inactivity, relevance and Boxing politics point of view.
he hasn't fought for 12 months. if the Wlad fight doesn't go ahead, it'll be another 4-6 months before he fights , unless he has a "stay busy" tomato can which will be meaningless and not financially attractive. He won't be fighting AJ for at least a year , I think we can agree on that, and even if he did get the chance, he wouldn't want to have 12-18 months of ring rust going into it. The same applies to Wilder, add to that Wilder is injured and wouldn't go straight into a unification.
if Tyson is 18 months between fights, people (general public, not you) will have forgotten what he did against Wlad. add to that , during this time , AJ is bowling guys over , building up his profile.
Secretly Tyson will be frustrated that he's not getting some of the gravy train, (and I don't blame him, so would I be!)
Finally, whether we like it or not, the powers that be (Governing bodies , promoters , etc. ) would love nothing more than to fuck Tyson around a bit and "Put him in his place".
I'm not saying this to have a pop, far from it. I actually feel that Fury deserves to make some serious cash , but sometimes the World's not fair.

Fury hasn't even defended the title yet, I'd rather see him facing Wilder/Joshua's murderers row comp than never fighting. He still hasn't proved he's not Buster Douglas.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Fury hasn't even defended the title yet, I'd rather see him facing Wilder/Joshua's murderers row comp than never fighting. He still hasn't proved he's not Buster Douglas.

---

Let's be serious Tyson Fury still hasn't proven he's a clean fighter

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Fury hasn't even defended the title yet, I'd rather see him facing Wilder/Joshua's murderers row comp than never fighting. He still hasn't proved he's not Buster Douglas.

---

Let's be serious Tyson Fury still hasn't proven he's a clean fighter

---

I cant believe how thick your being.

Let me put it in simple terms even a thick cunt like you might understand. If Tyson does lots of random testing like he has and never tests positive, hes pretty much proved hes clean. Until he tests negative which he never will unlike at least one of the Klitschkos, Alexander Povetkin, Luis Ortiz etc he will never be proven to be a cheat because hes not.

He wont need to be putting memory foam matresses under canvasses or in boxing gloves either:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Fury hasn't even defended the title yet, I'd rather see him facing Wilder/Joshua's murderers row comp than never fighting. He still hasn't proved he's not Buster Douglas.

---

Let's be serious Tyson Fury still hasn't proven he's a clean fighter

---

I cant believe how thick your being.

Let me put it in simple terms even a thick cunt like you might understand. If Tyson does lots of random testing like he has and never tests positive, hes pretty much proved hes clean. Until he tests negative which he never will unlike at least one of the Klitschkos, Alexander Povetkin, Luis Ortiz etc he will never be proven to be a cheat because hes not.

He wont need to be putting memory foam matresses under canvasses or in boxing gloves either:D

---

Testing negative is good a good thing as far as drug tests are concerned you fucking dolt.

Fury would move around the ring far faster and easier if ross wasn't hanging from his ass.

Not sure what it means but Fury is equally exciting when taking his shirt off and gorilla drumming his hairy bloated gut as he was 'boxing' Wlad to a win. Wlad is a follower in that fight as well as the rematch and current state of affairs. Just seems he should of built-had more leverage after going max to bust.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Fury hasn't even defended the title yet, I'd rather see him facing Wilder/Joshua's murderers row comp than never fighting. He still hasn't proved he's not Buster Douglas.

---

Let's be serious Tyson Fury still hasn't proven he's a clean fighter

---

I cant believe how thick your being.

Let me put it in simple terms even a thick cunt like you might understand. If Tyson does lots of random testing like he has and never tests positive, hes pretty much proved hes clean. Until he tests negative which he never will unlike at least one of the Klitschkos, Alexander Povetkin, Luis Ortiz etc he will never be proven to be a cheat because hes not.

He wont need to be putting memory foam matresses under canvasses or in boxing gloves either:D

---

Testing negative is good a good thing as far as drug tests are concerned you fucking dolt.

---

Im not going to bother editing it but you know what I mean, I put the wrong word, big deal, cling to that if you need to rather than acknowledge that he hasnt tested positive regardless of lots of random testing i.e. Proving hes clean....

I dont know why you girls start because you know after last time I can just keep going and win;D

So Tyson and Hughie have been cleared after testing positive for nandrolone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

So Tyson and Hughie have been cleared after testing positive for nandrolone?

---

Are you winding me up or have you read none of the reports?

They didnt test positive:rolleyes:

They had slighlty raised levels that supposedly is more than a normal person should have.

Put it this way so you might understand... Im assumng you understand testosterone? We all have it, even women. You can take testosterone boosters also which is ilegal in sports but is a natural occuring substance in the body. You can however get raised levels of testosterone after eating or doing certain things but probably not enough that you would fail any test or even raise the eyebrows of the testers, especially seeing as the B samples of both had no traces at all in. Just enough maybe for a rival competitor that doesnt want to have to compete against you to make noise about.

So UKad have apologised and admitted they made a mistake?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

So UKad have apologised and admitted they made a mistake?

---

They wont be saying anything of the sort because there are legal proceedings against them currently by Tyson Fury!;D:rolleyes:

"UK Anti-Doping will not comment further on the case until due legal process has been completed."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

So UKad have apologised and admitted they made a mistake?

---

They wont be saying anything of the sort because there are legal proceedings against them currently!;D:rolleyes:

"UK Anti-Doping will not comment further on the case until due legal process has been completed."

---

...So "No" then? That's a "No"....good talk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

So UKad have apologised and admitted they made a mistake?

---

They wont be saying anything of the sort because there are legal proceedings against them currently!;D:rolleyes:

"UK Anti-Doping will not comment further on the case until due legal process has been completed."

---

...So "No" then? That's a "No"....good talk

---

UKAD arent going to lose themselves a law suit by publicly admitting they were wrong are they you twat!;D

I find it very interesting that on UKAD twitter a few weeks ago they were advertising for a legal officer. I commented was this because the Furys are suing them. They then deleted the comment and changed it to to add that its for maternity cover!;D Hahaha! They dont want to lose face over this;D

Who the fuck follows ukad on twitter? 😂😂

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Who the fuck follows ukad on twitter? 😂😂

---

Me, a Guernsey boxer was caught importing steroids and I wanted to see their report. Is that ok with you;D

Wlad will retire , and Fury should fight Price to try to win back the IBF title Price now holds .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Who the fuck follows ukad on twitter? 😂😂

---

Me, a Guernsey boxer was caught importing steroids and I wanted to see their report. Is that ok with you;D

---

Yeah that's fine with me!😂😂😂. Temper, Temper, someone's tired! 😂😂
Btw , I heard Tyson Fury bought a Suit from Burtons the other day, you might wanna give them a follow. Twitter.com/Burton_Menswear. 😂😂😉

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Who the fuck follows ukad on twitter? 😂😂

---

Me, a Guernsey boxer was caught importing steroids and I wanted to see their report. Is that ok with you;D

---

Yeah that's fine with me!😂😂😂. Temper, Temper, someone's tired! 😂😂
Btw , I heard Tyson Fury bought a Suit from Burtons the other day, you might wanna give them a follow. Twitter.com/Burton_Menswear. 😂😂😉

---

Did you serve him?

Oh and heres the Guernsey boxer... https://twitter.com/ukantidoping/sta...14279709028352

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Did you serve him?

Oh and heres the Guernsey boxer... https://twitter.com/ukantidoping/sta...14279709028352

---

Just so everyone is clear UKAD popping an amateur boxer for PEDs = GOOD, UKAD popping Tyson Fury for PEDs = BAD


Everyone got that?