;D It’s a pain in the ass trying to syntax properly on a tablet. Perhaps telling that it was the only critique though?
Printable View
;D It’s a pain in the ass trying to syntax properly on a tablet. Perhaps telling that it was the only critique though?
Big T this troll is a clown, don't squander the grammatical invigilation @GandalfQuote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
A sentence should begin with capitalization and names should be capitalized too. B+ for effort.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
The first that came to mind was Stalin (though Hitler's mostache wa also like having a dead rat on your face).Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Also, the mostache-less Caligula —if what they say of him was actually true— was quite a cunt.
But the thing is that they were all probably Psycopaths or sociopaths (like Dr. Holms, Bundy and others) so you can't really determine who was more evil. They were just sick. My fav sicko was the Caligula of Tinto Brass.
Giving to those in need of your own free will is what Jesus preached. He didn't have government enforcement.Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomVERY different.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
Christ preached love, forgiveness and tolerance.
Marx encouraged class hatred and violent revolution.
Some who were evil but not as well known include:
Elizabeth Báthory, most prolific female serial killer of all time, who tried to stay young by bathing in the blood of little girls
Mass murderer Lazar Kaganovich, architect of the holodomor
Genrikh Yagoda, head of the Soviet NKVD in the 1930s
He claimed that there would come a time when the rich would be stripped of everything and the poor would have something. He just never got the chance to show how he would make that happen. We do know how that works in a world where revolution is successful though.Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongGiving to those in need of your own free will is what Jesus preached. He didn't have government enforcement.Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomVERY different.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
Christ preached love, forgiveness and tolerance.
Marx encouraged class hatred and violent revolution.
That's the dichotomy of the contemporary American Christian for me. They vote right wing and donate to churches, but it seems the complete opposite of what Jesus would have done.
"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword" Jesus - Those sound like the words of a revolutionary.
Then later his brother James seemingly says the following in one of his final sermons. James was known to have spread the word closest to that of Jesus being his brother and lead disciple: "Come now, you rich, weep and howl for the miseries that are coming upon you. Your riches have rotted and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold and silver have corroded, and their corrosion will be evidence against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have laid up treasure in the last days. Behold, the wages of the laborers who mowed your fields, which you kept back by fraud, are crying out against you, and the cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts. You have lived on the earth in luxury and in self-indulgence. You have fattened your hearts in a day of slaughter. .." - James
Again, these words sound more like something you would hear from a Chavez or a Castro.
Ha I like when people who don’t even follow Christianity pick a couple verses and use them to make a point. People spend a lifetime studying these vereses, miles is now a biblical expert. Why quote someone you don’t beleive?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
Islam gives a much more accurate picture of what Jesus actually said and what Jesus actually stood for. In the Koran it shows Jesus as someone who is a warrior to kill and to slaughter.
The watered-down Anglo-Saxon northern European spin of what Jesus really was is the laughing stock of the world
I think there are a couple of easy points to make there, but I just can’t get on your bad side. With Denny gone I just don’t feel any love here any more.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrusHa I like when people who don’t even follow Christianity pick a couple verses and use them to make a point. People spend a lifetime studying these vereses, miles is now a biblical expert. Why quote someone you don’t beleive?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
I do not claim to be a Biblical expert, but the Bible as Brock pointed out was just the bits a few big wigs in the 3rd century decided to collate and then the rest was excluded, often violently so. Now if you want to reference only the Bible as given to you in Hollywood/theological form then that is on you, but some people like to look into the actual history of things. Jesus appeared to be a bit of a radical and surely that is no big slur. Also a nationalist too, so you ain't getting in. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by walrusHa I like when people who don’t even follow Christianity pick a couple verses and use them to make a point. People spend a lifetime studying these vereses, miles is now a biblical expert. Why quote someone you don’t beleive?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
Oh didn’t know Brock the prince of darkness was involved in this discussion as well. I’ll step out, have fun both of uQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfI do not claim to be a Biblical expert, but the Bible as Brock pointed out was just the bits a few big wigs in the 3rd century decided to collate and then the rest was excluded, often violently so. Now if you want to reference only the Bible as given to you in Hollywood/theological form then that is on you, but some people like to look into the actual history of things. Jesus appeared to be a bit of a radical and surely that is no big slur. Also a nationalist too, so you ain't getting in. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by walrusHa I like when people who don’t even follow Christianity pick a couple verses and use them to make a point. People spend a lifetime studying these vereses, miles is now a biblical expert. Why quote someone you don’t beleive?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
In the New Testament there is/are:
1 letter from James the brother and successor of Jesus.
2 from Peter
3 from John
And 14 from Paul the man rejected and scorned by the disciples of Jesus.
Are you really comfortable with that Walrus?
Not looking to argue but it is quite obvious that the New Testament has little to do with the actual Jesus.
Paul was a charlatan and manipulator. The Daily Mail journalist of his day and that was chosen above everything else because Jerusalem had of course been destroyed and the friends of Jesus were all dead and had no voice?
I think I will take the words of James over the words of Paul. I am an earthly economic socialist. To think the Jews were persecuted because of Christianity all those centuries. It's interesting stuff. Hitler was a Catholic wasn't he and why on earth does the church need all that wealth and TV propaganda? It's completely phony. Maybe the most evil man in history will end up being Paul.
I am obviously being hyperbolic which is a kind of Paul'ism. :p
Some say Christianity was created by the Hebrews to pacify the Romans.
They were virtually invincible when they were pagans from 146 BC to 310 AD, but as Christians they began to lose to the Visigoths, Franks, Vandals and Alans.
Some people say you’re a creep.
Christianity: the most MAN-MADE PILE OF SHIT SINCE SANTA CLAUS AND THE EASTER BUNNY
Is there any need to offend? If you do not have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Is there any need to BE offended by an opposing opinion? Surely no matter how vile the criticism of Rocky Marciano or Indian food (2 things very very dear to me) I would not bat an eyelash.
Now, as for most evil people, let me chuck George Soros into the mix.
Henry Kissinger
Donald Rumsfeld
Paul Wolfowitz
Dick Cheney
Jim Jones of jonestown
Philip Morris
Tuskegee evil doctors
Operation Bootstrap doctors
Josef Mengele
Judas
Christopher Columbus