Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
difference is Bradley's beaten Holt, and was schooling Campbell until the headbutt
Great. What's Holt ever done? Headbutted Torres to defeat. That's literally it.
What does Nate Campbell have in his arsenal that makes beating him seem such a great achievement? Especially at 140?
All Campbell has is a surprise close win over Juan Diaz - who again has a history of being in very close fights against mediocre - but marketable fighters.
Holt also has wins over the bum that is David Diaz (if he's considered a "big win" for Manny why not for the first guy to do it), Hlatshwayo (a good solid fighter), Arnaoutis (need i say more? lol), and D-Hop
as for Campbell, did you forget that he also beat Ali Funeka? the same Funeka he dropped like a bag of bricks twice, and the same Funeka that basically dominated the undefeated Joan Guzman, and possibly the #1 or #2 guy at 135 now that Marquez has evidently left lightweight, don't try to change history cause come fight night most people had Campbell on their p4p lists and viewed the fight as a 50/50 fight, and IMO if it weren't for the headbutt Bradley still would have stopped him late
Agreed. I've purposefully tried to stay out of this thread, but people are starting to question Bradley, Campbell, Juan Diaz... I need to step in now. You can make any fighter sound bad if you try hard enough. Hell, I could say that all of Manny Pacquiao's big wins come off fighters who were either past their prime, or coming off recent losses. Hell, even Floyd Mayweather only seems to fight against boxers that are either smaller or slower than him... see what I mean people?
If the point of this thread was to prove that Kotelnik isn't mediocre, sorry but you've failed. If you think really hard, sure, you can find worse champions, but I don't think Kotelnik will ever go down as anything special in boxing history... mmmm.... mediocrity.
BTW, Maidana won their fight easily. That was a complete robbery in my eyes.
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Great. What's Holt ever done? Headbutted Torres to defeat. That's literally it.
What does Nate Campbell have in his arsenal that makes beating him seem such a great achievement? Especially at 140?
All Campbell has is a surprise close win over Juan Diaz - who again has a history of being in very close fights against mediocre - but marketable fighters.
Holt also has wins over the bum that is David Diaz (if he's considered a "big win" for Manny why not for the first guy to do it), Hlatshwayo (a good solid fighter), Arnaoutis (need i say more? lol), and D-Hop
as for Campbell, did you forget that he also beat Ali Funeka? the same Funeka he dropped like a bag of bricks twice, and the same Funeka that basically dominated the undefeated Joan Guzman, and possibly the #1 or #2 guy at 135 now that Marquez has evidently left lightweight, don't try to change history cause come fight night most people had Campbell on their p4p lists and viewed the fight as a 50/50 fight, and IMO if it weren't for the headbutt Bradley still would have stopped him late
Most people had Nate Campbell on their p4p lists? Are you joking?
He probably would have stopped him, because Nate Campbell isn't a strong welterweight. The fight with Bradley was clear evidence of that.
Even Joan Guzman is a fighter who blows hot and cold. Infront of the right opposition he looks fantastic, but equally he's capable of looking crap. And again, he's another fighter who hasn't beaten anybody that's worthy of all the hype he's had on here over the last few years.
The David Diaz point...i don't think anybody saw Manny's win as 'big' it was more a case of seeing if Manny could take his power up with him. Would you say that Hlatshwayo, Mighty Mike and D-Hop are any better than Kotelnik? If so, why?
It's a never ending cycle. People have said they'd give Khan credit for beating Maidana, Holt, Campbell, Paulie etc... when none of them have done anything to suggest they are any better than Kotelnik (who he got little credit for beating).
yea most people had Campbell on their p4p lists AT THAT TIME, Guzman has solid wins over Barrios and HUMBERTO SOTO, and the Campbell/Bradley fight was at jr welter not welter, and it was already known that Campbell was unable to make 135 anymore so a jump up to 140 was inevitable, try what you may but Kotelnik was/is garbage his biggest win is against a fighter mentioned in the most mediocre champions in Reese, he got a GIFT against Maidana and then Khan smashed him, and the point that you try to suggest that the limited, feather punching Kotelnik should be rated as highly as other clearly better fighters in Malignaggi, Campbell, Holt, Maidana, Urango, J. Diaz, Hatton, Bradley, even Torres and Ngoudjo are better fighters, is just comical
next you'll be stating the same as Seanie did above and try to convince us that Reese really wasn't half bad :rolleyes:
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TheBranMan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Great. What's Holt ever done? Headbutted Torres to defeat. That's literally it.
What does Nate Campbell have in his arsenal that makes beating him seem such a great achievement? Especially at 140?
All Campbell has is a surprise close win over Juan Diaz - who again has a history of being in very close fights against mediocre - but marketable fighters.
Holt also has wins over the bum that is David Diaz (if he's considered a "big win" for Manny why not for the first guy to do it), Hlatshwayo (a good solid fighter), Arnaoutis (need i say more? lol), and D-Hop
as for Campbell, did you forget that he also beat Ali Funeka? the same Funeka he dropped like a bag of bricks twice, and the same Funeka that basically dominated the undefeated Joan Guzman, and possibly the #1 or #2 guy at 135 now that Marquez has evidently left lightweight, don't try to change history cause come fight night most people had Campbell on their p4p lists and viewed the fight as a 50/50 fight, and IMO if it weren't for the headbutt Bradley still would have stopped him late
Agreed. I've purposefully tried to stay out of this thread, but people are starting to question Bradley, Campbell, Juan Diaz... I need to step in now. You can make any fighter sound bad if you try hard enough. Hell, I could say that all of Manny Pacquiao's big wins come off fighters who were either past their prime, or coming off recent losses. Hell, even Floyd Mayweather only seems to fight against boxers that are either smaller or slower than him... see what I mean people?
If the point of this thread was to prove that Kotelnik isn't mediocre, sorry but you've failed. If you think really hard, sure, you can find worse champions, but I don't think Kotelnik will ever go down as anything special in boxing history... mmmm.... mediocrity.
BTW, Maidana won their fight easily. That was a complete robbery in my eyes.
No it wasn't to show that Kotelnik wasn't mediocre. The point was to give your lost of ten of the worst world champions over the last 10 years. Only Mick has done that.
I'm not even saying Kotelnik isn't mediocre. I'm saying that he's probably on par with the people who've been mentioned as credible opponents for Khan. Turns out, post fight that the Kotelnik win didn't really mean much. My point is, a win over Holt, D-Hop, Maidana, Even Campbell at 140, Paulie et al would mean as little as the win over Kotelnik, once the dust has settled.
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Holt also has wins over the bum that is David Diaz (if he's considered a "big win" for Manny why not for the first guy to do it), Hlatshwayo (a good solid fighter), Arnaoutis (need i say more? lol), and D-Hop
as for Campbell, did you forget that he also beat Ali Funeka? the same Funeka he dropped like a bag of bricks twice, and the same Funeka that basically dominated the undefeated Joan Guzman, and possibly the #1 or #2 guy at 135 now that Marquez has evidently left lightweight, don't try to change history cause come fight night most people had Campbell on their p4p lists and viewed the fight as a 50/50 fight, and IMO if it weren't for the headbutt Bradley still would have stopped him late
Most people had Nate Campbell on their p4p lists? Are you joking?
He probably would have stopped him, because Nate Campbell isn't a strong welterweight. The fight with Bradley was clear evidence of that.
Even Joan Guzman is a fighter who blows hot and cold. Infront of the right opposition he looks fantastic, but equally he's capable of looking crap. And again, he's another fighter who hasn't beaten anybody that's worthy of all the hype he's had on here over the last few years.
The David Diaz point...i don't think anybody saw Manny's win as 'big' it was more a case of seeing if Manny could take his power up with him. Would you say that Hlatshwayo, Mighty Mike and D-Hop are any better than Kotelnik? If so, why?
It's a never ending cycle. People have said they'd give Khan credit for beating Maidana, Holt, Campbell, Paulie etc... when none of them have done anything to suggest they are any better than Kotelnik (who he got little credit for beating).
yea most people had Campbell on their p4p lists AT THAT TIME, Guzman has solid wins over Barrios and HUMBERTO SOTO, and the Campbell/Bradley fight was at jr welter not welter, and it was already known that Campbell was unable to make 135 anymore so a jump up to 140 was inevitable, try what you may but Kotelnik was/is garbage his biggest win is against a fighter mentioned in the most mediocre champions in Reese, he got a GIFT against Maidana and then Khan smashed him, and the point that you try to suggest that the limited, feather punching Kotelnik should be rated as highly as other clearly better fighters in Malignaggi, Campbell, Holt, Maidana, Urango, J. Diaz, Hatton, Bradley, even Torres and Ngoudjo are better fighters, is just comical
next you'll be stating the same as Seanie did above and try to convince us that Reese really wasn't half bad :rolleyes:
Sorry i meant light welter. Campbell won't ever be effective at 140. He didn't get a gift against Maidana. That's your opinion.
EDIT: Where did people have Campbell on their p4p lists? Top 100?
Please explain to me what Urango, Paulie, Holt, Maidana (infact you think Maidana is clearly better than Kotelnik, yet he lost to him), Ngoudjo have all done that dwarthes anything that Kotelnik has ever achieved.
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Most people had Nate Campbell on their p4p lists? Are you joking?
He probably would have stopped him, because Nate Campbell isn't a strong welterweight. The fight with Bradley was clear evidence of that.
Even Joan Guzman is a fighter who blows hot and cold. Infront of the right opposition he looks fantastic, but equally he's capable of looking crap. And again, he's another fighter who hasn't beaten anybody that's worthy of all the hype he's had on here over the last few years.
The David Diaz point...i don't think anybody saw Manny's win as 'big' it was more a case of seeing if Manny could take his power up with him. Would you say that Hlatshwayo, Mighty Mike and D-Hop are any better than Kotelnik? If so, why?
It's a never ending cycle. People have said they'd give Khan credit for beating Maidana, Holt, Campbell, Paulie etc... when none of them have done anything to suggest they are any better than Kotelnik (who he got little credit for beating).
yea most people had Campbell on their p4p lists AT THAT TIME, Guzman has solid wins over Barrios and HUMBERTO SOTO, and the Campbell/Bradley fight was at jr welter not welter, and it was already known that Campbell was unable to make 135 anymore so a jump up to 140 was inevitable, try what you may but Kotelnik was/is garbage his biggest win is against a fighter mentioned in the most mediocre champions in Reese, he got a GIFT against Maidana and then Khan smashed him, and the point that you try to suggest that the limited, feather punching Kotelnik should be rated as highly as other clearly better fighters in Malignaggi, Campbell, Holt, Maidana, Urango, J. Diaz, Hatton, Bradley, even Torres and Ngoudjo are better fighters, is just comical
next you'll be stating the same as Seanie did above and try to convince us that Reese really wasn't half bad :rolleyes:
Sorry i meant light welter. Campbell won't ever be effective at 140. He didn't get a gift against Maidana. That's your opinion.
EDIT: Where did people have Campbell on their p4p lists? Top 100?
Please explain to me what Urango, Paulie, Holt, Maidana (infact you think Maidana is clearly better than Kotelnik, yet he lost to him), Ngoudjo have all done that dwarthes anything that Kotelnik has ever achieved.
for fuck sake Campbell was even on Saddos p4p list at the time of the Bradley fight, he was on Espns p4p list, obviously not now
and all of those mentioned have done well against top tier opposition not just against Reese, and a GIFT against Maidana
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
yea most people had Campbell on their p4p lists AT THAT TIME, Guzman has solid wins over Barrios and HUMBERTO SOTO, and the Campbell/Bradley fight was at jr welter not welter, and it was already known that Campbell was unable to make 135 anymore so a jump up to 140 was inevitable, try what you may but Kotelnik was/is garbage his biggest win is against a fighter mentioned in the most mediocre champions in Reese, he got a GIFT against Maidana and then Khan smashed him, and the point that you try to suggest that the limited, feather punching Kotelnik should be rated as highly as other clearly better fighters in Malignaggi, Campbell, Holt, Maidana, Urango, J. Diaz, Hatton, Bradley, even Torres and Ngoudjo are better fighters, is just comical
next you'll be stating the same as Seanie did above and try to convince us that Reese really wasn't half bad :rolleyes:
Sorry i meant light welter. Campbell won't ever be effective at 140. He didn't get a gift against Maidana. That's your opinion.
EDIT: Where did people have Campbell on their p4p lists? Top 100?
Please explain to me what Urango, Paulie, Holt, Maidana (infact you think Maidana is clearly better than Kotelnik, yet he lost to him), Ngoudjo have all done that dwarthes anything that Kotelnik has ever achieved.
for fuck sake Campbell was even on Saddos p4p list at the time of the Bradley fight, he was on Espns p4p list, obviously not now
and all of those mentioned have done well against top tier opposition not just against Reese, and a GIFT against Maidana
Well let's break down what you've said.
Juan Urango - Ricky Hatton. Urango won 1 round. Hatton had flu
Juan Urango - Andre Berto. Berto coasted to victory
Kendall Holt - Was on a suicide mission before headbutting Torres. Beaten Mighty Mike, and laboured to wins over Ben Tackie and D-Hop. Hardly awe-inspiring.
Paulie - Got beaten up by Cotto, Got beaten up by Hatton. Nearly got stopped by Ngoudjo, Best win is Lovemore N'Dou.
Maidana - Floored twice but out-battled Victor 'i know i'm a boxer but i shouldn't be taking punches' Ortiz. Lost to Kotelnik the worst fighter ever to lace up gloves. Please stop typing gift in capitals. It doesn't make it true. :p
The sad thing is, all of the above fighters (Khan and Kotelnik included) are all by definition 'world class'. By that, i mean they are roughly the best Boxing has to offer in the 10 stone category. None of those fighters have done anything that Kotelnik isn't capable of, yet he'd get a tone of credit for beating them.
Edit: If we're getting bogged down in what ESPN think, Dan Rafael believes Kotelnik won the Maidana fight.
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Sorry i meant light welter. Campbell won't ever be effective at 140. He didn't get a gift against Maidana. That's your opinion.
EDIT: Where did people have Campbell on their p4p lists? Top 100?
Please explain to me what Urango, Paulie, Holt, Maidana (infact you think Maidana is clearly better than Kotelnik, yet he lost to him), Ngoudjo have all done that dwarthes anything that Kotelnik has ever achieved.
for fuck sake Campbell was even on Saddos p4p list at the time of the Bradley fight, he was on Espns p4p list, obviously not now
and all of those mentioned have done well against top tier opposition not just against Reese, and a GIFT against Maidana
Well let's break down what you've said.
Juan Urango - Ricky Hatton. Urango won 1 round. Hatton had flu
Juan Urango - Andre Berto. Berto coasted to victory
Kendall Holt - Was on a suicide mission before headbutting Torres. Beaten Mighty Mike, and laboured to wins over Ben Tackie and D-Hop. Hardly awe-inspiring.
Paulie - Got beaten up by Cotto, Got beaten up by Hatton. Nearly got stopped by Ngoudjo, Best win is Lovemore N'Dou.
Maidana - Floored twice but out-battled Victor 'i know i'm a boxer but i shouldn't be taking punches' Ortiz. Lost to Kotelnik the worst fighter ever to lace up gloves. Please stop typing gift in capitals. It doesn't make it true. :p
The sad thing is, all of the above fighters (Khan and Kotelnik included) are all by definition 'world class'. By that, i mean they are roughly the best Boxing has to offer in the 10 stone category. None of those fighters have done anything that Kotelnik isn't capable of, yet he'd get a tone of credit for beating them.
Kotelnik- a win over Reese :-X and a gift against Maidana
sure as hell seems the weakest of the bunch
and just in case i've been saying that Kotelnik was garbage even before he fought Khan, so stop trying to make Amir a victim
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
for fuck sake Campbell was even on Saddos p4p list at the time of the Bradley fight, he was on Espns p4p list, obviously not now
and all of those mentioned have done well against top tier opposition not just against Reese, and a GIFT against Maidana
Well let's break down what you've said.
Juan Urango - Ricky Hatton. Urango won 1 round. Hatton had flu
Juan Urango - Andre Berto. Berto coasted to victory
Kendall Holt - Was on a suicide mission before headbutting Torres. Beaten Mighty Mike, and laboured to wins over Ben Tackie and D-Hop. Hardly awe-inspiring.
Paulie - Got beaten up by Cotto, Got beaten up by Hatton. Nearly got stopped by Ngoudjo, Best win is Lovemore N'Dou.
Maidana - Floored twice but out-battled Victor 'i know i'm a boxer but i shouldn't be taking punches' Ortiz. Lost to Kotelnik the worst fighter ever to lace up gloves. Please stop typing gift in capitals. It doesn't make it true. :p
The sad thing is, all of the above fighters (Khan and Kotelnik included) are all by definition 'world class'. By that, i mean they are roughly the best Boxing has to offer in the 10 stone category. None of those fighters have done anything that Kotelnik isn't capable of, yet he'd get a tone of credit for beating them.
Kotelnik- a win over Reese :-X and a gift against Maidana
sure as hell seems the weakest of the bunch
and just in case i've been saying that Kotelnik was garbage even before he fought Khan, so stop trying to make Amir a victim
No he doesn't. 1) - Because he beat Maidana. Out of interest, seen as though you were so eager to point out that ESPN had Nate Campbell listed, let me say, Dan Rafael had Kotelnik winning the Maidana fight.2) - Urango's wins over Ngoudjo and Bailey aren't really any better than Kotelnik's wins over Rees and MaidanaI'm not trying to say Khan is a victim. I'm saying that to me, beating Urango, Maidana, Paulie etc...aint that much of a step up from Kotelnik. In other words, i don't see how you'd give him zero credit for beating Kotelnik but you'd give him credit for beating any of the above 3.
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Well let's break down what you've said.
Juan Urango - Ricky Hatton. Urango won 1 round. Hatton had flu
Juan Urango - Andre Berto. Berto coasted to victory
Kendall Holt - Was on a suicide mission before headbutting Torres. Beaten Mighty Mike, and laboured to wins over Ben Tackie and D-Hop. Hardly awe-inspiring.
Paulie - Got beaten up by Cotto, Got beaten up by Hatton. Nearly got stopped by Ngoudjo, Best win is Lovemore N'Dou.
Maidana - Floored twice but out-battled Victor 'i know i'm a boxer but i shouldn't be taking punches' Ortiz. Lost to Kotelnik the worst fighter ever to lace up gloves. Please stop typing gift in capitals. It doesn't make it true. :p
The sad thing is, all of the above fighters (Khan and Kotelnik included) are all by definition 'world class'. By that, i mean they are roughly the best Boxing has to offer in the 10 stone category. None of those fighters have done anything that Kotelnik isn't capable of, yet he'd get a tone of credit for beating them.
Kotelnik- a win over Reese :-X and a gift against Maidana
sure as hell seems the weakest of the bunch
and just in case i've been saying that Kotelnik was garbage even before he fought Khan, so stop trying to make Amir a victim
No he doesn't. 1) - Because he beat Maidana. Out of interest, seen as though you were so eager to point out that ESPN had Nate Campbell listed, let me say, Dan Rafael had Kotelnik winning the Maidana fight.2) - Urango's wins over Ngoudjo and Bailey aren't really any better than Kotelnik's wins over Rees and MaidanaI'm not trying to say Khan is a victim. I'm saying that to me, beating Urango, Maidana, Paulie etc...aint that much of a step up from Kotelnik. In other words, i don't see how you'd give him zero credit for beating Kotelnik but you'd give him credit for beating any of the above 3.
i'm not even gonna bother trying to explain it anymore cause if you can't see the difference between the quality in Kotelnik and the others mentioned it's pretty clear that you're blind, Kotelnik always has and always will be garbage, not all that great technically and has the punching power of a mouse, it's pathetic, Khan needs to step it up, and if you can't see how much better and able the others are mentioned than you better quit trying cause you must be blind
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Kotelnik- a win over Reese :-X and a gift against Maidana
sure as hell seems the weakest of the bunch
and just in case i've been saying that Kotelnik was garbage even before he fought Khan, so stop trying to make Amir a victim
No he doesn't. 1) - Because he beat Maidana. Out of interest, seen as though you were so eager to point out that ESPN had Nate Campbell listed, let me say, Dan Rafael had Kotelnik winning the Maidana fight.2) - Urango's wins over Ngoudjo and Bailey aren't really any better than Kotelnik's wins over Rees and MaidanaI'm not trying to say Khan is a victim. I'm saying that to me, beating Urango, Maidana, Paulie etc...aint that much of a step up from Kotelnik. In other words, i don't see how you'd give him zero credit for beating Kotelnik but you'd give him credit for beating any of the above 3.
i'm not even gonna bother trying to explain it anymore cause if you can't see the difference between the quality in Kotelnik and the others mentioned it's pretty clear that you're blind, Kotelnik always has and always will be garbage, not all that great technically and has the punching power of a mouse, it's pathetic, Khan needs to step it up, and if you can't see how much better and able the others are mentioned than you better quit trying cause you must be blind
I can't see it. That's why i'm asking you to show me...
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Only Gavin Rees, Enzo Macarinelli are worse than Kotelnik.
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
I think that Markus Beyer with all these dubious decisions in Germany and the cherrypicked opponents by good old Wise Sauerland have to be sitting somewhere among them all.
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Sorry i meant light welter. Campbell won't ever be effective at 140. He didn't get a gift against Maidana. That's your opinion.
EDIT: Where did people have Campbell on their p4p lists? Top 100?
Please explain to me what Urango, Paulie, Holt, Maidana (infact you think Maidana is clearly better than Kotelnik, yet he lost to him), Ngoudjo have all done that dwarthes anything that Kotelnik has ever achieved.
for fuck sake Campbell was even on Saddos p4p list at the time of the Bradley fight, he was on Espns p4p list, obviously not now
and all of those mentioned have done well against top tier opposition not just against Reese, and a GIFT against Maidana
Well let's break down what you've said.
Juan Urango - Ricky Hatton. Urango won 1 round. Hatton had flu
Juan Urango - Andre Berto. Berto coasted to victory
Kendall Holt - Was on a suicide mission before headbutting Torres. Beaten Mighty Mike, and laboured to wins over Ben Tackie and D-Hop. Hardly awe-inspiring.
Paulie - Got beaten up by Cotto, Got beaten up by Hatton. Nearly got stopped by Ngoudjo, Best win is Lovemore N'Dou.
Maidana - Floored twice but out-battled Victor 'i know i'm a boxer but i shouldn't be taking punches' Ortiz. Lost to Kotelnik the worst fighter ever to lace up gloves. Please stop typing gift in capitals. It doesn't make it true. :p
The sad thing is, all of the above fighters (Khan and Kotelnik included) are all by definition 'world class'. By that, i mean they are roughly the best Boxing has to offer in the 10 stone category. None of those fighters have done anything that Kotelnik isn't capable of, yet he'd get a tone of credit for beating them.
Edit: If we're getting bogged down in what ESPN think, Dan Rafael believes Kotelnik won the Maidana fight.
Holt has a win over the 147 IBF Champ aswell well hahaha as I speak he is now the ex but Holt's resume is way better than Kotelniks.
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CutMeMick
Since 2000... Man I can give you more then 10. ;D
Does Interim count?
Some of these might be Interim
1st name that comes to mind Sultan Ibragimov...
After that:
Kelvin Davis
Michelle Piccirillo
Beibis Mendoza
Valery Brudov
Malcom Tunacao
Carlos Baldomir
Alejandro Berrio
Manny Siaca
Maselino Masoe
Javier Jauregui
David Diaz
Pick any one of the latest S. African fighters St. Clair, Baloyi, Klassen...
Fuck I can't remember his name right now but he's the only Mongolian ever to win a title. Fuck I can't remember his name and I can picture him and he has a pretty easy/simple name. (Not a common name but simple)
:furious2: Fuck I can't remember... Anyways him. ;D
Lakva Sim.
At least I remembered... A day later. :rolleyes:
Re: The most mediocre world champion of the last ten years...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tysonbruno
Joe Calzaghe LOL!;D;) No Gavin Rees is easy number 1 on this list for mediocre World champs.
Souleymane M'Baye is the worst for me. I knew Rees would beat him. I actually picked Rees to win, because you just had to watch M'Baye once to know how shit he was. Awful excuse for a Champion.
