Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
@TitoFan - You need a video? For fucks sake talk about denial (how many times?)
Here's the same HBO guys confirming Marquez ducked Naz (@AdamGB - Frank Warren had nothing to do with Naz at this stage). All four turned down huge career high paydays.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPcD-...okDBQ&index=72
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
It took you over an hour to take the bait.
I'm somewhat disappointed.
:)
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
It took you over an hour to take the bait.
I'm somewhat disappointed.
:)
Well I can't react to things I haven't seen.
It actually took me about 30 seconds to provide the uninitiated with the truth.
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...
Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?
He is based on what is.
and that my friends is a fact.
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CutMeMick
JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...
Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?
He is based on what is.
and that my friends is a fact.
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
:reporter:
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CutMeMick
JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...
Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?
He is based on what is.
and that my friends is a fact.
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
:reporter:
Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.
Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.
And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CutMeMick
JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...
Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?
He is based on what is.
and that my friends is a fact.
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
:reporter:
Are you calling @
CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.
Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.
And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.
"JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."
Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CutMeMick
JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...
Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?
He is based on what is.
and that my friends is a fact.
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
:reporter:
Are you calling @
CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.
Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.
And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.
"JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."
Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM
ever ducked Naz?
If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.
What does that quote have to do with Marquez ducking Naz? He said he thinks Marquez would beat Naz. That's fair enough.
Show me where he said - "HBO, Jim Lampley and Larry Merchant were lying?"
Just because Marquez ducked Naz it doesn't mean he isn't better than him. Fact.
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CutMeMick
JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...
Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?
He is based on what is.
and that my friends is a fact.
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
:reporter:
Are you calling @
CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.
Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.
And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.
"JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."
Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM
ever ducked Naz?
If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.
What does that quote have to do with Marquez ducking Naz? He said he thinks Marquez would beat Naz. That's fair enough.
Show me where in his post he said - "HBO, Jim Lampley and Larry Merchant were lying?"
Just because Marquez ducked Naz it doesn't mean he isn't better than him. Fact.
He didn't say he "thinks Marquez would beat Naz".
He said Marquez would "beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."
Slight difference. ;)
If you need it to be explained, let me know.
Also, nice try on the "me calling CMM a moron" bit.
You sounded like the 5th grader egging on two 9th graders to a fistfight.
How typically "Fenster-ish" of you.
:)
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
JMM was THEE mandatory challenger to Naz... Naz ducked him for a long time.
That is a fact.
Emmanuel Steward (RIP) admitted to telling Naz and advising to steer clear from him and not fight him and Naz listened.
That is also a fact.
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Fenster?
I believe you're up.
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Well I do need it explained to me?
How does someone saying a fighter would win a fight mean the other guy ducked him?
And how the fuck can a fighter be "ducking" someone that is on record admitting they refused the fight?
(beyond stupid)
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Ah... temper, temper.
Go back and read post 41. Then let me know if there's something in there you did not understand.
Go on now...