JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...
Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?
He is based on what is.
and that my friends is a fact.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 15
Dislikes: 0
Circa 1985
Array
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...
Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?
He is based on what is.
and that my friends is a fact.
Old Guard
Array
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.
And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Old Guard
Array
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.
And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.
"JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."
Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
What does that quote have to do with Marquez ducking Naz? He said he thinks Marquez would beat Naz. That's fair enough.Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.
And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.
"JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."
Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.
Show me where he said - "HBO, Jim Lampley and Larry Merchant were lying?"
Just because Marquez ducked Naz it doesn't mean he isn't better than him. Fact.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Old Guard
Array
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
What does that quote have to do with Marquez ducking Naz? He said he thinks Marquez would beat Naz. That's fair enough.Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.
So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?
Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.
And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.
"JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."
Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.
Show me where in his post he said - "HBO, Jim Lampley and Larry Merchant were lying?"
Just because Marquez ducked Naz it doesn't mean he isn't better than him. Fact.
He didn't say he "thinks Marquez would beat Naz".
He said Marquez would "beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."
Slight difference.
If you need it to be explained, let me know.
Also, nice try on the "me calling CMM a moron" bit.
You sounded like the 5th grader egging on two 9th graders to a fistfight.
How typically "Fenster-ish" of you.
Circa 1985
Array
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
JMM was THEE mandatory challenger to Naz... Naz ducked him for a long time.
That is a fact.
Emmanuel Steward (RIP) admitted to telling Naz and advising to steer clear from him and not fight him and Naz listened.
That is also a fact.
Old Guard
Array
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
Fenster?
I believe you're up.
Forum Contender
Array
Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.
It is a fact, but it only paints part of the picture. Naz was a superstar, and as such cherry picked opponents that would make big fights. Luis Abregu is number one contender for Mayweather's title, but I won't be accusing Mayweather of ducking him if they never fight.
I'm a huge Marquez fan, but I'm not kidding myself that he was the same fighter in the late nineties that he became a few years later. Marquez didn't win a world title until after Naz retired. Marquez has stated himself many times that he became more aggressive later in his career because he threw away fights.
If I had to place a bet, I'd put it on Naz to beat a pre 2000 Marquez.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks