Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

[TitoFan]

JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...

Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?

He is based on what is.


and that my friends is a fact.

So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?

Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.

Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.

And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.

"JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."


Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.

[Fenster]

JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...

Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?

He is based on what is.


and that my friends is a fact.

So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?

Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.

Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.

And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.

"JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."


Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.

What does that quote have to do with Marquez ducking Naz? He said he thinks Marquez would beat Naz. That's fair enough.

Show me where he said - "HBO, Jim Lampley and Larry Merchant were lying?"

Just because Marquez ducked Naz it doesn't mean he isn't better than him. Fact.

[TitoFan]

JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch...

Don't get shit twisted JMM is a REAL legend based on REAL facts.
Not based on what could have? Or what might have?

He is based on what is.


and that my friends is a fact.

So you're saying that talk of JMM ducking Naseem at any point in time is basically a crock of shit?

Are you calling @CutMeMick a moron? There's evidence of Marquez ducking Naz on this very page. I'm pretty certain he can hear and read.

Mick said Marquez is a legend. No boxing fan on earth would disagree with that.

And he believes Marquez would beat Naz, but i'm sure he agrees, even if Marquez didn't beat Naz, and got Pacquiao'd, he'd still be a legend. Fact.

"JMM would beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."


Does that quote sound like someone who would agree that JMM ever ducked Naz?
If you think it does..... we have nothing more to talk about.

What does that quote have to do with Marquez ducking Naz? He said he thinks Marquez would beat Naz. That's fair enough.

Show me where in his post he said - "HBO, Jim Lampley and Larry Merchant were lying?"

Just because Marquez ducked Naz it doesn't mean he isn't better than him. Fact.

He didn't say he "thinks Marquez would beat Naz".
He said Marquez would "beat Naz 7 ways til Sunday and twice before lunch..."

Slight difference.
If you need it to be explained, let me know.


Also, nice try on the "me calling CMM a moron" bit.
You sounded like the 5th grader egging on two 9th graders to a fistfight.
How typically "Fenster-ish" of you.

[CutMeMick]

JMM was THEE mandatory challenger to Naz... Naz ducked him for a long time.
That is a fact.

Emmanuel Steward (RIP) admitted to telling Naz and advising to steer clear from him and not fight him and Naz listened.
That is also a fact.

[TitoFan]

Fenster?
I believe you're up.

[Fenster]

Well I do need it explained to me?

How does someone saying a fighter would win a fight mean the other guy ducked him?

And how the fuck can a fighter be "ducking" someone that is on record admitting they refused the fight?

(beyond stupid)

[TitoFan]

Ah... temper, temper.

Go back and read post 41. Then let me know if there's something in there you did not understand.

Go on now...

[Fenster]

Ah... temper, temper.

Go back and read post 41. Then let me know if there's something in there you did not understand.

Go on now...

The questions in post 43 were directly related to the replies in posts 40 and 41.

Want to have a go at answering the questions? Or you waiting for Mick?

[Bobthepen]

JMM was THEE mandatory challenger to Naz... Naz ducked him for a long time.
That is a fact.

Emmanuel Steward (RIP) admitted to telling Naz and advising to steer clear from him and not fight him and Naz listened.
That is also a fact.

It is a fact, but it only paints part of the picture. Naz was a superstar, and as such cherry picked opponents that would make big fights. Luis Abregu is number one contender for Mayweather's title, but I won't be accusing Mayweather of ducking him if they never fight.

I'm a huge Marquez fan, but I'm not kidding myself that he was the same fighter in the late nineties that he became a few years later. Marquez didn't win a world title until after Naz retired. Marquez has stated himself many times that he became more aggressive later in his career because he threw away fights.
If I had to place a bet, I'd put it on Naz to beat a pre 2000 Marquez.

[Fenster]

JMM was THEE mandatory challenger to Naz... Naz ducked him for a long time.
That is a fact.

Emmanuel Steward (RIP) admitted to telling Naz and advising to steer clear from him and not fight him and Naz listened.
That is also a fact.

It is a fact, but it only paints part of the picture. Naz was a superstar, and as such cherry picked opponents that would make big fights. Luis Abregu is number one contender for Mayweather's title, but I won't be accusing Mayweather of ducking him if they never fight.

I'm a huge Marquez fan, but I'm not kidding myself that he was the same fighter in the late nineties that he became a few years later. Marquez didn't win a world title until after Naz retired. Marquez has stated himself many times that he became more aggressive later in his career because he threw away fights.
If I had to place a bet, I'd put it on Naz to beat a pre 2000 Marquez.

Exactly.

Sadly though that is far to complex for some fans to understand. Some can't even accept that a fighter who says "I turned down the fight" actually turned it down. Hilarious/Madness.

[AdamGB]

That's because one fighter has a history of fighting the GREAT fighters of his era and the other, to put it mildly... doesn't.

Call me crazy, but when it comes to opposing stories, I am more likely to side with the guy who didn't retire after having fought and widely lost to the single truly elite that he ever faced.

If Hamed left a better legacy then I might be more open to your cries of avoidance.

[TitoFan]

Ouch! That had to hurt.
Once again.......