Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.
GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...
No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.
Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.
Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
Why? Broners a piece of shit. I hold virtually everyone in the world to a higher standard then him
For all we know you're a piece of shit.
At least Broner isn't a 32 year old coward hiding in a dead weight division.
"I'll fight anybody from 154 to 168"
Soon as Ward responded....nothing but crickets.
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
Its not the main difference. This is the main difference, who does GGG fight at 168 where he will get a huge payday? Ward? Unlikely to get 7 figs to fight Ward and even at that Ward will call all the shots, venue, ref, weight etc.
So it's OK for fighters to be about the money...all of a sudden.
Floyd is hated for fighting for money.....but not the foreigners.
OK i get it.
Ward would bring GG more money (and prestige)than anybody at 160.
Where is he going to make 7 figs???
Chavez jr?
MAYBE
But he'll look more like a cringing coward if he beat Chavez then scurried back down to 160 to avoid Ward.
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.
GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...
No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.
Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.
Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
Why? Broners a piece of shit. I hold virtually everyone in the world to a higher standard then him
For all we know you're a piece of shit.
At least Broner isn't a 32 year old coward hiding in a dead weight division.
"I'll fight anybody from 154 to 168"
Soon as Ward responded....nothing but crickets.
No hes a 24 year punk wannabe gangster who takes easy fights and looks shit. And just because you put quotation marks around a phrase doesnt make it a quote you absolute cretin, show me a video of Golovkin saying hell fight anyone?
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.
GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...
No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.
Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.
Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
Why? Broners a piece of shit. I hold virtually everyone in the world to a higher standard then him
For all we know you're a piece of shit.
At least Broner isn't a 32 year old coward hiding in a dead weight division.
"I'll fight anybody from 154 to 168"
Soon as Ward responded....nothing but crickets.
No hes a 24 year punk wannabe gangster who takes easy fights and looks shit. And just because you put quotation marks around a phrase doesnt make it a quote you absolute cretin, show me a video of Golovkin saying hell fight anyone?
Taking easy fights sums up GG's entire career.
Broner started at 130 and jumped all the way to WW in a matter of months...if only GG had those balls.
GG's handlers said he'd fight anybody from 154 to 168.
Now show me where Golovkin disagreed with his handlers
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maravilla2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maravilla2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.
GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...
No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.
Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.
Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
are you directed this at me specifically or just in general? i hold all fighters to the same standards. i am not the one who said that floyd or broner had to move up weight to prove themselves. i didnt even say that ggg couldnt. im just saying that crawford is growing out of his weight class and that the next weight class up is where big money fights are. again, if ggg were growing out of his weight class too i would say the same thing. and as maravilla said, ggg was supposed to fight chavez at 168 but the fight fell through.
There is nothing at 160 for GG since Sergio was executed.
He'd be HEAVILLY favored over anybody in that dead excuse for a weight division...in other words THERE ARE NO CHALLENGES FOR HIM at 160.
Seems like he should be "challenging himself" and "taking risks".
GG was quick to move to 168 for Jr but told Ward he had too much business to take of at 160.
It was a bitch move that he should have been called out for.
You're such a clown. You were silent for a week after Russell got schooled and waited for Crawford to win and came back the same. You shouldn't be taking Broner as a role model. You dont know shit about boxing.
Broner is better than any mexican around.;D
Russell got schooled by Lomenchenko....not Lopez...;D;D
Get off his coattails.
I don't have to wait for anything or anybody..unlike you mexicans...ya'll damn near out of boxing.
Not better then Marquez or Canelo.
hahahaha
Broner is a better fighter than Canelito.
Broner would whip the lice off JMM.
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Back on topic ;) Beltran has to be the obvious choice or possibly Diaz considering their association with Top Rank :-\
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maravilla2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
La Cucaracha
Back on topic ;) Beltran has to be the obvious choice or possibly Diaz considering their association with Top Rank :-\
Well Crawford had trouble making weight. He said before the fight that he'd move up afterwards and he said he'd leave it to the managers which if I were he's manager id move him up to 140 to where the big money is. He could beat Peterson, a fight with DeMarco would be okay, Broner , Garcia. And if Pac if really going to 140 thatd be a fight to look for later on.
I'd like to see Crawford fight at least once more at 135 :) but if he is struggling to make weight then a move up would be sensible :-\ but if he can build his following against Beltran and Diaz then the money for bigger fights at 140 increases ;D
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maravilla2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maravilla2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.
GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...
No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.
Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.
Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
are you directed this at me specifically or just in general? i hold all fighters to the same standards. i am not the one who said that floyd or broner had to move up weight to prove themselves. i didnt even say that ggg couldnt. im just saying that crawford is growing out of his weight class and that the next weight class up is where big money fights are. again, if ggg were growing out of his weight class too i would say the same thing. and as maravilla said, ggg was supposed to fight chavez at 168 but the fight fell through.
There is nothing at 160 for GG since Sergio was executed.
He'd be HEAVILLY favored over anybody in that dead excuse for a weight division...in other words THERE ARE NO CHALLENGES FOR HIM at 160.
Seems like he should be "challenging himself" and "taking risks".
GG was quick to move to 168 for Jr but told Ward he had too much business to take of at 160.
It was a bitch move that he should have been called out for.
You're such a clown. You were silent for a week after Russell got schooled and waited for Crawford to win and came back the same. You shouldn't be taking Broner as a role model. You dont know shit about boxing.
Broner is better than any mexican around.;D
Russell got schooled by Lomenchenko....not Lopez...;D;D
Get off his coattails.
I don't have to wait for anything or anybody..unlike you mexicans...ya'll damn near out of boxing.
Not better then Marquez or Canelo.
hahahaha
Broner is a better fighter than Canelito.
Broner would whip the lice off JMM.
I'm pulling the unofficial and erratic but necessary fuck you & shut your cornhole card. Nobody fookin cares, stay on topic or go play in the street. When you devolve to smoking Broner as a skilled boxer who did it the right way in weight rise you have jumped the shark. That's just desperate and embarrassing. Thanks for playing.
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
I'll second that. I thought this fucker was going to get banned if he came back?
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Crawford should fight Vazquez, so we have a lineal Lightweight champion.
A win over Mikey Garcia would probably put him in the top 10 P4P rankings, though.
Imagine how insane it would be if Crawford had back to back wins over Gamboa and Garcia.
Re: Terrance Crawford...next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VG_Addict
Crawford should fight Vazquez, so we have a lineal Lightweight champion.
A win over Mikey Garcia would probably put him in the top 10 P4P rankings, though.
Imagine how insane it would be if Crawford had back to back wins over Gamboa and Garcia.
Imagine if Garcia beats Crawford :p
