Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: Terrance Crawford...next?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    619
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    726
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Maravilla2012 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
    Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.

    GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...

    No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.

    Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.

    Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
    are you directed this at me specifically or just in general? i hold all fighters to the same standards. i am not the one who said that floyd or broner had to move up weight to prove themselves. i didnt even say that ggg couldnt. im just saying that crawford is growing out of his weight class and that the next weight class up is where big money fights are. again, if ggg were growing out of his weight class too i would say the same thing. and as maravilla said, ggg was supposed to fight chavez at 168 but the fight fell through.
    There is nothing at 160 for GG since Sergio was executed.

    He'd be HEAVILLY favored over anybody in that dead excuse for a weight division...in other words THERE ARE NO CHALLENGES FOR HIM at 160.

    Seems like he should be "challenging himself" and "taking risks".

    GG was quick to move to 168 for Jr but told Ward he had too much business to take of at 160.

    It was a bitch move that he should have been called out for.
    You're such a clown. You were silent for a week after Russell got schooled and waited for Crawford to win and came back the same. You shouldn't be taking Broner as a role model. You dont know shit about boxing.
    Broner is better than any mexican around.

    Russell got schooled by Lomenchenko....not Lopez...

    Get off his coattails.

    I don't have to wait for anything or anybody..unlike you mexicans...ya'll damn near out of boxing.

    Not better then Marquez or Canelo.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    535
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    593
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Terrance Crawford...next?

    Quote Originally Posted by Maravilla2012 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Maravilla2012 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
    Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.

    GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...

    No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.

    Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.

    Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
    are you directed this at me specifically or just in general? i hold all fighters to the same standards. i am not the one who said that floyd or broner had to move up weight to prove themselves. i didnt even say that ggg couldnt. im just saying that crawford is growing out of his weight class and that the next weight class up is where big money fights are. again, if ggg were growing out of his weight class too i would say the same thing. and as maravilla said, ggg was supposed to fight chavez at 168 but the fight fell through.
    There is nothing at 160 for GG since Sergio was executed.

    He'd be HEAVILLY favored over anybody in that dead excuse for a weight division...in other words THERE ARE NO CHALLENGES FOR HIM at 160.

    Seems like he should be "challenging himself" and "taking risks".

    GG was quick to move to 168 for Jr but told Ward he had too much business to take of at 160.

    It was a bitch move that he should have been called out for.
    You're such a clown. You were silent for a week after Russell got schooled and waited for Crawford to win and came back the same. You shouldn't be taking Broner as a role model. You dont know shit about boxing.
    Broner is better than any mexican around.

    Russell got schooled by Lomenchenko....not Lopez...

    Get off his coattails.

    I don't have to wait for anything or anybody..unlike you mexicans...ya'll damn near out of boxing.

    Not better then Marquez or Canelo.
    hahahaha

    Broner is a better fighter than Canelito.

    Broner would whip the lice off JMM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,075
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5123
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Terrance Crawford...next?

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Maravilla2012 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Maravilla2012 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    The main difference is that Crawford is struggling to make lightweight. GGG is not at all struggling to make middleweight. Crawford would be around the same size as the people at 140 while GGG would be way smaller than those at 168. If Crawford were in GGG's situation, I wouldn't mind if he didn't move up.
    Yeah but Crawford isn't 32 years old.

    GG would not be way smaller than the guys at 168...stop with that shit...HE said he's fight ANYBODY from 154 to 168...

    No need to start making excuses...especially since he's supposed to be all that.

    Crawford would be around the same size as the guys at 140 BUT he has ZERO experience fighting 140lb fighters.

    Ya'll should hold GG to the same standards Broner and Floyd are held to.
    are you directed this at me specifically or just in general? i hold all fighters to the same standards. i am not the one who said that floyd or broner had to move up weight to prove themselves. i didnt even say that ggg couldnt. im just saying that crawford is growing out of his weight class and that the next weight class up is where big money fights are. again, if ggg were growing out of his weight class too i would say the same thing. and as maravilla said, ggg was supposed to fight chavez at 168 but the fight fell through.
    There is nothing at 160 for GG since Sergio was executed.

    He'd be HEAVILLY favored over anybody in that dead excuse for a weight division...in other words THERE ARE NO CHALLENGES FOR HIM at 160.

    Seems like he should be "challenging himself" and "taking risks".

    GG was quick to move to 168 for Jr but told Ward he had too much business to take of at 160.

    It was a bitch move that he should have been called out for.
    You're such a clown. You were silent for a week after Russell got schooled and waited for Crawford to win and came back the same. You shouldn't be taking Broner as a role model. You dont know shit about boxing.
    Broner is better than any mexican around.

    Russell got schooled by Lomenchenko....not Lopez...

    Get off his coattails.

    I don't have to wait for anything or anybody..unlike you mexicans...ya'll damn near out of boxing.

    Not better then Marquez or Canelo.
    hahahaha

    Broner is a better fighter than Canelito.

    Broner would whip the lice off JMM.
    I'm pulling the unofficial and erratic but necessary fuck you & shut your cornhole card. Nobody fookin cares, stay on topic or go play in the street. When you devolve to smoking Broner as a skilled boxer who did it the right way in weight rise you have jumped the shark. That's just desperate and embarrassing. Thanks for playing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Terrance Crawford...next?

    I'll second that. I thought this fucker was going to get banned if he came back?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Crawford v Gamboa June 29
    By IamInuit in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 07-01-2014, 12:33 PM
  2. Crawford-Beltran is next
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-16-2014, 08:10 AM
  3. Mr Crawford
    By Dia bando in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-05-2014, 09:56 AM
  4. WBO orders Burns-Crawford
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-19-2013, 07:30 AM
  5. Terrance Crawford vs. Adrien Broner
    By Hulk in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-09-2013, 07:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing