Printable View
like i said nutthugger make up your mindQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
Boxrec rankings are not done by experts... :lickish:Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleThose same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
PAC already gave JMM 2 chances... but JMM can't convincingly defeat PAC... You can't really criticize PAC if he won't give JMM a 3rd chance... Also PAC is going for big fights before he retires... He has one more fight left after Hatton... Why give it to JMM when there's still PBF, Cotto, Mosley, etc. out there... We already seen a PAC-JMM fight 2 times already and what we saw on both occassions was JMM kissing the canvass... I'm tired of seeing JMM with his butt on the canvass...Quote:
Originally Posted by bruceleeJMM is chasing Pac coz he knows he was defeated by Pac. For short, he's insecure with his status. If he's not, why chase Pac?Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesno dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" MarquezQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
Pac is still p4p numero uno and JMM is just bitter with losing to Pac just as many of his fans are. FACT.
.
I have Manny #1 at 135. Here are my rankings at 140:
Jr. Welterweight (140 lbs)
1. Ricky Hatton
2. Juan Urango
3. Kendall Holt
4.Andreas Kotelnik
5. Timothy Bradley
6. Joan Guzman
7. Ricardo Torres
8. Marcos Maidana
9. Junior Witter
10.Randall Bailey
11.Herman Ngoudjo
12.Paul Malignaggi
13. Lamont Peterson
14. Mike Arnaoutis
15. Devon Alexander
unlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce LeroyQuote:
Originally Posted by bruceleeDon't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesBruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La HoyaQuote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.
If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM;D
Boxrec rankings are done by computers... :lickish:Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoraleslike i said nutthugger make up your mindQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerBoxrec rankings are not done by experts... :lickish:Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle
.
.
Do u agree with the Boxrec computers that Manny is P4P #5 Rainman? Answer or are u too scared??? Everybody already thinks your a fool so answering wont change much.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerBoxrec rankings are done by computers... :lickish:Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoraleslike i said nutthugger make up your mindQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
If boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.;D;D;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesunlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce LeroyQuote:
Originally Posted by bruceleeDon't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM;D
why? because my boxing knowledge isn't centered on Pacquiao? dude go beat off to your Ring Mags with Pacs face on the cover ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by bruceleeIf boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.;D;D;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesunlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce LeroyQuote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
and your name is "el terrible morales". at least I haven't named myself after Pac.;D;D;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoraleswhy? because my boxing knowledge isn't centered on Pacquiao? dude go beat off to your Ring Mags with Pacs face on the cover ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by bruceleeIf boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.;D;D;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
This is one occasion that humans (FightNews) and computers (BoxRec) are in agreement that boxer Manny Pacquiao is the no. 1 man at 140 division... ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by eagleDo u agree with the Boxrec computers that Manny is P4P #5 Rainman? Answer or are u too scared??? Everybody already thinks your a fool so answering wont change much.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerBoxrec rankings are done by computers... :lickish:Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
.
.
you don't hear me turning every single thread into something based on Morales now do you?, hell wouldn't be surprised one bit if you were able to squeeze in Pacman in a thread about W. Klitschko vs David HayeQuote:
Originally Posted by bruceleeand your name is "el terrible morales". at least I haven't named myself after Pac.;D;D;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoraleswhy? because my boxing knowledge isn't centered on Pacquiao? dude go beat off to your Ring Mags with Pacs face on the cover ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
Answer the question. Do u agree with the Boxrec P4P rankings that have Pac at #5? Yes or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerThis is one occasion that humans (FightNews) and computers (BoxRec) are in agreement that boxer Manny Pacquiao is the no. 1 man at 140 division... ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by eagleDo u agree with the Boxrec computers that Manny is P4P #5 Rainman? Answer or are u too scared??? Everybody already thinks your a fool so answering wont change much.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
you know damn well neither Saddoboxer or Bruce Leroy are gonna man up to itQuote:
Originally Posted by eagleAnswer the question. Do u agree with the Boxrec P4P rankings that have Pac at #5? Yes or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerThis is one occasion that humans (FightNews) and computers (BoxRec) are in agreement that boxer Manny Pacquiao is the no. 1 man at 140 division... ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by eagle
.
Hard to man up when your not a man i suppose...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesyou know damn well neither Saddoboxer or Bruce Leroy are gonna man up to itQuote:
Originally Posted by eagleAnswer the question. Do u agree with the Boxrec P4P rankings that have Pac at #5? Yes or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
They pick and choose what they want to hear and lack the reasoning and critical thinking skills to actually back it up when called out. Repetition and mimicry is their medium for expression. In the animal kingdom they are known as sheep. Sheep are good for eating and making woolly sweaters. That is all.
If you're intelligent enough, you know the answer by now... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleAnswer the question. Do u agree with the Boxrec P4P rankings that have Pac at #5? Yes or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerThis is one occasion that humans (FightNews) and computers (BoxRec) are in agreement that boxer Manny Pacquiao is the no. 1 man at 140 division... ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by eagle
.
Or you need more clues?? ;D
Why dont u just tell me genius...Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerIf you're intelligent enough, you know the answer by now... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleAnswer the question. Do u agree with the Boxrec P4P rankings that have Pac at #5? Yes or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
Or you need more clues?? ;D
miles are you referring to eagle? he's been repeating asking me this same question on this thread many times already... maybe 20 times already... :lolhaha:Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
.
You are asking him to talk without riddles and to give a straight answer????Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleWhy dont u just tell me genius...Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerIf you're intelligent enough, you know the answer by now... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle
Or you need more clues?? ;D
Best of luck!! ;D
why are we bumping this shitte :kar:We might as well name this thread...best ingredients for an omelet:
green peppers
onion
minced ham
chopped tomatoes...garlic and Mrs dash
and do not forget the many cheeses....im hungry :biteit:.
You're liking this too much!!Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxermiles are you referring to eagle? he's been repeating asking me this same question on this thread many times already... maybe 20 times already... :lolhaha:Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
.
And yet still no answer from the numb nuts i ask. He must be brain dead.Yes or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxermiles are you referring to eagle? he's been repeating asking me this same question on this thread many times already... maybe 20 times already... :lolhaha:Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
.
I predict he will just say something elusive and cryptic. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleAnd yet still no answer from the numb nuts i ask. He must be brain dead.Yes or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxermiles are you referring to eagle? he's been repeating asking me this same question on this thread many times already... maybe 20 times already... :lolhaha:Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
.
I predict he is really not a he but a she. Only a women could dodge and weave away from the truth this much.Quote:
Originally Posted by milesI predict he will just say something elusive and cryptic. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleAnd yet still no answer from the numb nuts i ask. He must be brain dead.Yes or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
Saddoboxer, do you agree with boxrec having PAC #5 p4p?
Ohh ohhh... you accept you're not smart enough to know the answer??Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleWhy dont u just tell me genius...Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerIf you're intelligent enough, you know the answer by now... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle
Or you need more clues?? ;D
.
No i accept that u dont think like a normal person so i have to ask u what your opinion is cos its not obvious. Why not answer? Scared. FoolQuote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerOhh ohhh... you accept you're not smart enough to know the answer??Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleWhy dont u just tell me genius...Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
Saddoboxer, that is a lame answer. Do you actually have a direct answer to a rather straightforward question? Or is it that you don't actually know?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerOhh ohhh... you accept you're not smart enough to know the answer??Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleWhy dont u just tell me genius...Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
.
Your prediction is correct...Quote:
Originally Posted by milesI predict he will just say something elusive and cryptic. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleAnd yet still no answer from the numb nuts i ask. He must be brain dead.Yes or no?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
:LOLATYOU:Quote:
Originally Posted by bruceleeDon't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesBruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La HoyaQuote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.
If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM;D
Unlike eagle, I think you're intelligent enough to locate the answer killersheep...Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
.
Unlike eagle, I think you're smart enough to locate where to find the answer miles...Quote:
Originally Posted by milesSaddoboxer, that is a lame answer. Do you actually have a direct answer to a rather straightforward question? Or is it that you don't actually know?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerOhh ohhh... you accept you're not smart enough to know the answer??Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle
.
Look i clearly dont know where to look. So tell me.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxerUnlike eagle, I think you're smart enough to locate where to find the answer miles...Quote:
Originally Posted by milesSaddoboxer, that is a lame answer. Do you actually have a direct answer to a rather straightforward question? Or is it that you don't actually know?Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer