-
Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Shane has said he will take 40/60 split in Pacquiao's favour he will come down to 144lbs Shane is the number 1 Welterweight in the world surely this fight would be bigger than Pacquiao vs Cotto and i would love to see Mosley vs Pacquiao who is with me??
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
He should only fight Mosely if he wants to get brutalized ;D
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Id rather see Cotto v Pac, it is the bigger fight financially anyway.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
i would love to see the fight mate. cotto v pac is also a great fight tho, down the road i hope pbf v pac is made, its got to be the biggest fight out there
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
I think Mosley would Demolish Pacquiao inside 5 rounds and i think Pacquiao,Roach and Arum all know this and Cotto is the easier option as he has looked quite vunerable vs Margarito and Clottey although these are both class acts i just think Cotto's edge has slipped abit since his beat down from the Master of Plaster Antonio margarito.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
At last someone that thinks the same as me. Pacman should definetly fight Mosley instead of Cotto but I think Pacman saw the weakness's in Cotto's arsenal after the Margarito and the Clottey fight and thinks it will be an easier fight than facing Mosley.
Mosley agreed to all Mannys and Roaches terms but still they both decided to fight Cotto instead. Who can blame Pacman for going for the easier fight I spose I just hope that Cotto KOs his arse.
I think Shane looked too good in beating Margarito and it has left him out in the cold with only a possible fight with the freak that is Williams (which I dont blame anyone not wanting to fight with his reach and punch output) and Clottey who is a dangerous fight but for little reward in imop.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Boxerharvey
At last someone that thinks the same as me. Pacman should definetly fight Mosley instead of Cotto but I think Pacman saw the weakness's in Cotto's arsenal after the Margarito and the Clottey fight and thinks it will be an easier fight than facing Mosley.
Mosley agreed to all Mannys and Roaches terms but still they both decided to fight Cotto instead. Who can blame Pacman for going for the easier fight I spose I just hope that Cotto KOs his arse.
I think Shane looked too good in beating Margarito and it has left him out in the cold with only a possible fight with the freak that is Williams (which I dont blame anyone not wanting to fight with his reach and punch output) and Clottey who is a dangerous fight but for little reward in imop.
totally agree
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
PBF should be fighting Mosely, not Marquez. Mosely would beat Pacquiao and PBF in my opinion. He is the class at 147, which is more the reason why Pacquiao should beat the rest before taking the biggest risk. Wait for age to catch up with Shane a little bit.
Mosely deserves a big pay day, but at the end of the day if it don't make dollas' then it don't make cents'. A fight with Cotto is a bigger fight financially and is less risky. Thus, there is no reason to fight Mosely with Cotto available. Cotto, like Pacquiao, is also managed by Top Rank, which means that fight makes more money for Arum. Additionally, Cotto beat Mosely.
And the Cotto fight is no easy fight by any means. It was agreed to be at 145 from what I understand, which Cotto can easily make. Cotto has fought the best welterweights in the business and has a near impeccable CV.
Also, after brutally destroying Hatton, absolutely crushing him and probably sending him into retirement, and making ODLH quit on his stool, Pacquiao deserves to take any fight he wants right now.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
I'd give Pacquiao credit for fighting any of the top welters with belts and would pay money to watch any of them. It makes sense for him to take the biggest money available. I think Cotto brings more money than Mosely, but I'm no expert on this by any means.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
It's a never ending story of the excuses. Mosley lost to Cotto, so logically it makes more sense for him to fight Cotto.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
And Cotto got torn up against Margarito (the same guy that Mosley outboxed, out fought and generally just schooled) and then struggled to win convincingly against Clottey...
So really I think logic can go out the window... ;)
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
I would love to see it but like other people have said in this thread, Mosley is more dangerous at this point than Cotto, who showed alot of vulnerability in the Clottey fight. Mosley has an iron chin and Roach probably feels that it will be along night if and when they decide to take on Sugar. Where Cotto is starting show alot more wear and tear as of late. I think most ranked Welters are hoping that father time catches up to Mosley and are going to avoid him as long as they possibly can.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Mosley should take a tune-up and then fight the winner of PBF-JMM. In my opinion.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TRIGGERMAN
Pac-Cotto is bigger event than Pac-Mosley. And why would team pac take a big-risk-low-reward fight?
Ding, Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner.
The same reason why Pacman won't fight Mosley is the same reason why Mosley and basically every Welterweight out there didn't want to fight Paul Williams.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Wow people on here way overrate MOsley, did you see him against Mayorga? The first Vargas fight? Against Vernon Forest? Against Winky WRight?
Mosley is a really good fighter, but look at what Oscar did to Mayorga, then what Mosley did against him, and PBF beat Oscar handily. Mosley is getting way too much credit for beating a sitting duck in Magarito who is slow as hell, and the only thing you have to do against him is move half decently.
Cotto beat Mosley, and I think Clottey would give Mosley more than he could handle as well. I mean Clottey wouldn't be hurt by Mosley, he has fast enough hands to land on Mosley, and his defense is good enough to block Mosley's predictable offensive sequences.
Mosley is in the same league as Cotto and Clottey and the rest of the top WW, which is a step below Mayweather, and possibly Pacquiao, I am not sure how Pacquiao skills will matchup against somebody with speed similar to his own because that has been his huge advantage against Oscar and Hatton so far. That being said Mosley is hardly a gifted counter puncher against anyone with any semblance of a defense, or he hasn't been for some time. IMO Marquez has the same type of handspeed as current Mosley, but he is so much sharper.
IMO Pacquiao-Mosley is 50/50
and PAcquiao-Cotto is 60/40, but it will be much bigger for the sport, and Manny will get similar credit as he should fighting Mosley because Cotto has much better timing, hits harder, and IMO naturally bigger than Mosley in everyway except height and reach.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Im not really fussed with Pac fight Mosley. Im more into Mosley fighting Mayweather (Who has more credibility at 147)
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
I have no problem with Pac fighting Cotto since Cotto beat Mosely. The fighter the Mosely should be fighting is Floyd. Instead Mayweather fights another GBP fighter in Marquez.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
And Cotto got torn up against Margarito (the same guy that Mosley outboxed, out fought and generally just schooled) and then struggled to win convincingly against Clottey...
So really I think logic can go out the window... ;)
If it were a round robin tournament, I'd agree but basically I'm only comparing Mosley and Cotto. Margacheato is not in the picture.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TRIGGERMAN
Pac-Cotto is bigger event than Pac-Mosley. And why would team pac take a big-risk-low-reward fight?
What are you talking about? How is Pacquiao facing any welter weight not a risk? Yet he's tentatively facing Cotto....
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
And Cotto got torn up against Margarito (the same guy that Mosley outboxed, out fought and generally just schooled) and then struggled to win convincingly against Clottey...
So really I think logic can go out the window... ;)
If it were a round robin tournament, I'd agree but basically I'm only comparing Mosley and Cotto. Margacheato is not in the picture.
Yeah but my point is that Pac's team must know that Cottos is more flawed/vunerable than Mosley, hence taking cottos instead. :)
One thing that Cotto will have going for him is that Pac's team won't find it as easy to weight drain Cotto (on paper at least anyway) as with Oscar/the attempt at Mosley, he's not as big in the first place and isn't that long removed from 140.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
People are tripping saying Mosley is a big risk low reward. Mosley is a big risk and a big reward. Pac would get the percentage he was looking for and money still along the lines of a Cotto fight. And Mosley is THE welterweight champ right now. Beating him is a much bigger reward than beating Cotto. It would be historical. A lot of people already see Pac beating Cotto. Very very few against Mosley. So the real problem is that Mosley is a big reward but way too big of a risk. It would knock off a lot of Pac's marketability if he got blown out. The other fights would then be less eventful. Mosley and Williams are the "stay away" welterweights for Pac. And Roach knows it.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
i think Pac is avoiding Mosley or Roach.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
De La Hoya did his 2 worst PPVs with Mosley. And usually the big names of the sport manages to do really well when fighting Oscar the cash cow. Not to mentioned the Margarito-Mosley fight didn't sell that well.
Hell Floyd called out Shane years ago when Floyd was still at Super Feather to do business in the ring and Shane said no, now Shane wants a big money fight and all the guys are saying hell no because you don't draw viewers. So basically a high risk low reward type of fight for everyone. Only Shane has himself to blame. If I was Pacman I would rather fight for bigger money with Cotto and his large fanbase of Puerto Ricans or Mayweather and his status in the game as the default P4p champ wtih a zero loss for the mythical p4p title.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
De La Hoya did his 2 worst PPVs with Mosley. And usually the big names of the sport manages to do really well when fighting Oscar the cash cow. Not to mentioned the Margarito-Mosley fight didn't sell that well.
Hell Floyd called out Shane years ago when Floyd was still at Super Feather to do business in the ring and Shane said no, now Shane wants a big money fight and all the guys are saying hell no because you don't draw viewers. So basically a high risk low reward type of fight for everyone. Only Shane has himself to blame. If I was Pacman I would rather fight for bigger money with Cotto and his large fanbase of Puerto Ricans or Mayweather and his status in the game as the default P4p champ wtih a zero loss for the mythical p4p title.
(1) Its just a flat fucking lie either that or you're severely misinformed. ODLH v Mosley 2 sold had over 950k buys..which is ranks 4th only behind oscar's fights with PBF, TITO, and BHOP...All the others are earned and sold less...Whichs includes VArgas, Quartey, Mayorga, Sweet Pea, JCC, Gernaro Hernandez and Sturm so please with the mosely isn't a draw bull shit.
(2) Neiher Mayweather or Shane ever really talked about fighting each back then and it was only discussed after Shane was ranked p4p 1 in the same year that floyd won Fighter of the year and it was just that. Simple speculation. Shane had moved up to face oscar while floyd was having trouble with JLC a fight that ended all the speculation about he'd do against at that time Shane mosely no 1 p4p.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jimboogie
Im not really fussed with Pac fight Mosley. Im more into Mosley fighting Mayweather (Who has more credibility at 147)
I agree too, I wonder what dick head neg repped you? PBF-SHANE is a much better fight than watching either one of them school manny esp PBF would expose Manny's reach. I think floyd would actually stop manny late and shane would walk through him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taeth
Wow people on here way overrate MOsley, did you see him against Mayorga? The first Vargas fight? Against Vernon Forest? Against Winky WRight?
Mosley is a really good fighter, but look at what Oscar did to Mayorga, then what Mosley did against him, and PBF beat Oscar handily. Mosley is getting way too much credit for beating a sitting duck in Magarito who is slow as hell, and the only thing you have to do against him is move half decently.
Cotto beat Mosley, and I think Clottey would give Mosley more than he could handle as well. I mean Clottey wouldn't be hurt by Mosley, he has fast enough hands to land on Mosley, and his defense is good enough to block Mosley's predictable offensive sequences.
Mosley is in the same league as Cotto and Clottey and the rest of the top WW, which is a step below Mayweather, and possibly Pacquiao, I am not sure how Pacquiao skills will matchup against somebody with speed similar to his own because that has been his huge advantage against Oscar and Hatton so far. That being said Mosley is hardly a gifted counter puncher against anyone with any semblance of a defense, or he hasn't been for some time. IMO Marquez has the same type of handspeed as current Mosley, but he is so much sharper.
IMO Pacquiao-Mosley is 50/50
and PAcquiao-Cotto is 60/40, but it will be much bigger for the sport, and Manny will get similar credit as he should fighting Mosley because Cotto has much better timing, hits harder, and IMO naturally bigger than Mosley in everyway except height and reach.
I sometimes wonder what you have against Shane...
(1) You ask did anyone see how shane did against 4 fighters that are naturally bigger than. Winky, MAYORGA, FoRRest. VARGAS. Two of whom he stopped!?!?!?!?!?!? Winky has been up to 174. And has Taylor, hopkins, and Tito on his resume. And these are the guys you use to discredit shane. That logic escapes me.
(2) You say look at what Oscar did to Mayorga vs what Shane did then say PBF beat oscar handedly? If that's the case Shane beat Oscar more handedly and clearly than Floyd so what's your point?
(3) Lastly, You really believe Cotto is better than Mosely. Where it should be clear that Cotto got the Decision based off him being the young star on the rise with a fight with Tony right behind it. Although the decision was still a toss up and would not have been a problem either way. And then you say Cotto has better timing than Mosley and hits harder? Then explain how Shane Manages to stop the Man that made cotto quit when cotto hit margarito more times than shane? Name one fighter with a granite chin that Cotto has stopped or even clearly hurt..
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
When did Mosley beat Oscar more clearly than Mayweather? Which fucking fight? The first one he didn't, the second fight which was a more complete Oscar, he didn't even deserve to win that fight, and was outlanded by a large margin. Also that Mosley isn't the one you see today, both of those versions of him possessed a little more speed, and a little more power, I don't think he was a lot worse, but a little bit worse for sure, even though now he is a little better at dealing with the bigger guys.
Vargas was bigger, but severly weight drained especially in the second fight, and he was way past his prime, which he wasn't when he faced Oscar.
Mayorga was bigger than Oscar also, but Oscar has better punching power, and he is a better boxer than Mosley who is primarily speed.
Are you honestly arguing who has the better timing between SHane Mosley and Cotto? Watch their fight again, it was close but Cotto clearly won, and he was badly outtiming Mosley early.
Against Margarito, SHane wasn't fighting off the ropes like Cotto was, once again watch Mosley-COtto, Miguel was landing the much harder punches between them. Shane also muscled Margarito around, which I said Cotto should have done, he was moving Tony around the few times he clinched him, but Mosley was leaning on Margarito, forcing him backwards and landing big punches while Margarito wasn't.
Explain to me how Floyd sapped the energy out of Baldomir, while Judah and Vernon FOrrest who hit harder couldn't make him lose his spirit. Its because not being able to land punches tires you out way faster than landing shots. Thats why Pavlik got so tired against Hopkins.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tysonbruno
Shane has said he will take 40/60 split in Pacquiao's favour he will come down to 144lbs Shane is the number 1 Welterweight in the world surely this fight would be bigger than Pacquiao vs Cotto and i would love to see Mosley vs Pacquiao who is with me??
Honestly, I would enjoy either fight. Both are Pacquiao fighting the best welterweights out there. Hard to complain about this one.
I knew this would end up a fight against Cotto cause Arum has both fighters under Top Rank. It's too sweet a deal for him.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taeth
When did Mosley beat Oscar more clearly than Mayweather? Which fucking fight? The first one he didn't, the second fight which was a more complete Oscar, he didn't even deserve to win that fight, and was outlanded by a large margin. Also that Mosley isn't the one you see today, both of those versions of him possessed a little more speed, and a little more power, I don't think he was a lot worse, but a little bit worse for sure, even though now he is a little better at dealing with the bigger guys.
Vargas was bigger, but severly weight drained especially in the second fight, and he was way past his prime, which he wasn't when he faced Oscar.
Mayorga was bigger than Oscar also, but Oscar has better punching power, and he is a better boxer than Mosley who is primarily speed.
Are you honestly arguing who has the better timing between SHane Mosley and Cotto? Watch their fight again, it was close but Cotto clearly won, and he was badly outtiming Mosley early.
Against Margarito, SHane wasn't fighting off the ropes like Cotto was, once again watch Mosley-COtto, Miguel was landing the much harder punches between them. Shane also muscled Margarito around, which I said Cotto should have done, he was moving Tony around the few times he clinched him, but Mosley was leaning on Margarito, forcing him backwards and landing big punches while Margarito wasn't.
Explain to me how Floyd sapped the energy out of Baldomir, while Judah and Vernon FOrrest who hit harder couldn't make him lose his spirit. Its because not being able to land punches tires you out way faster than landing shots. Thats why Pavlik got so tired against Hopkins.
Shane hit oscar more times than anyone oscar has ever faced in that first fight. And if you're saying that "mosley was a different fighter back then" than surely oscar was a different fighter he was "prime" practically undefeated when he faced mosley. Not some money hungry whore that Floyd faced. And in the second fight mosley was clearly hindered mentally or something by the added muscle and was only throwing one or two punches at a time not one fluid combo. I also thought Oscar won the fight. But nevertheless Shane got the decision. Much Like cotto over shane.
Oh I watched it more than enough to know that shane was hurting miguel much more than he was being hurt, thats why cotto was running the couple of rounds. Which also served as an indicator that he (cotto) probably would tire against Margarito.
what I don't understand is how you're one of the few alone with floyd and his lapdog ellerbe who doesn't think shane is deserving of mega fight. We can go on forever about who we think did better against who and when. But the fact of the matter is this:
SHANE MOSLEY as it stands is the number WW in the world PERIOD. Regardless of what he used to be. Even if he is a shell of the package he once was, the leftover version thoroughly dominated then kayoed the undisputed WW champ Antonio Margarito. No one else at WW can make that claim. Esp not Cotto.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Manny landed nearly as many punches in 8 rounds as Mosley did in 11 in ODLH-Mosley I. Oscar wasn't at his prime, people get confused by the fact that he was faster, but his boxing skills, his right hand, his movement, his defense were all still undeveloped compared to later. If Mosley bulked up naturally then it would make sense that he would be slower, but due to the fact he used steriods he would have more quick twitch fiber and would be faster, the reason he didn't look as good is he started to wing punches, and guys like Oscar, Winky, and Forest realized he isn't a great outside fighter.
On another subject Cotto was affected more by Mosley's punches than vice virsa for the obvious reason, Mosley has 10x the chin he does, but it was clear to see who landing the harder punches, and Cotto forced Mosley to run as well, and while Cotto had a cut in his mouth, Mosley just plain backed off because Cotto was beating him to the punch, and landing a lot harder.
The reason Pacquiao and Mayweather shouldn't face Mosley before eachother and COtto is because it makes no sense, hardly anyone considers Mosley a better fighter than Cotto, and he can't draw the same crowd Cotto, PAcquiao, and Mayweather can. Mayweather is coming off two years of retirement, is Marquez not a valid come back fight? I didn't see people chewing Pavlik's ass off for fighting Rubio or Cotto for facing Michael Jennings. Marquez is one hell of a fighter to face for a comeback fight. I think personally MArquez is more dangerous for a guy like Mayweather, he's sharper, he's very fast, he will take a punch to land one, and he has good outside boxing skills. I see him taking Mayweather into deep waters in different ways than Mosley, but I think those waters are deeper. I think its harder to nullify Marquez than it is to nullify Mosley if Mayweather can't hurt MArquez.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taeth
Manny landed nearly as many punches in 8 rounds as Mosley did in 11 in ODLH-Mosley I. Oscar wasn't at his prime, people get confused by the fact that he was faster, but his boxing skills, his right hand, his movement, his defense were all still undeveloped compared to later. If Mosley bulked up naturally then it would make sense that he would be slower, but due to the fact he used steriods he would have more quick twitch fiber and would be faster, the reason he didn't look as good is he started to wing punches, and guys like Oscar, Winky, and Forest realized he isn't a great outside fighter.
On another subject Cotto was affected more by Mosley's punches than vice virsa for the obvious reason, Mosley has 10x the chin he does, but it was clear to see who landing the harder punches, and Cotto forced Mosley to run as well, and while Cotto had a cut in his mouth, Mosley just plain backed off because Cotto was beating him to the punch, and landing a lot harder.
The reason Pacquiao and Mayweather shouldn't face Mosley before eachother and COtto is because it makes no sense, hardly anyone considers Mosley a better fighter than Cotto, and he can't draw the same crowd Cotto, PAcquiao, and Mayweather can. Mayweather is coming off two years of retirement, is Marquez not a valid come back fight? I didn't see people chewing Pavlik's ass off for fighting Rubio or Cotto for facing Michael Jennings. Marquez is one hell of a fighter to face for a comeback fight. I think personally MArquez is more dangerous for a guy like Mayweather, he's sharper, he's very fast, he will take a punch to land one, and he has good outside boxing skills. I see him taking Mayweather into deep waters in different ways than Mosley, but I think those waters are deeper. I think its harder to nullify Marquez than it is to nullify Mosley if Mayweather can't hurt MArquez.
You have to be working for floyd or just..i don't know man...but dude are you seriously saying that oscar wasn't prime when fought mosley? And suggesting that floyd fought a better version? Dude by your logic about oscar not being prime when faced mosley means that oscar is a mediocre contender at best, because if he wasn't prime until after he fought shane that means his record according to you is
32-1 not prime with wins over JCCx2, Sweet PEA, Quartey, hernandez, leija, carr, camacho, campanaella, with only that controversial loss to tito...
7-5 (prime or post Mosley I) with wins over Gatti (please), Castelleijo, forbes, mayorga, vargas, campas, a bullshit decision over Sturm and two losses by way of stoppage?
In what world did he get better after he lost to Mosley?
and secondly, dude your punching power doesn't mean anything if its nullified by the opponents chin...your punching power in ring only counts if you HURT your opponent. And Mosley hurt Cotto more. Which brings me back to Mosley Kayoed Margarito with less punches landed than cotto, regardless of whether or not Margarito was able to get off or not. He was fucking stopped. He had never been stopped before. You say floyd zapped Baldomir's energy by making him miss? But he didn't stop him did he? Because he didn't have the power to. Cotto landed over one hundred more punches than shane against Tony and he still walked through them. Shane at 154 wobbled Winky, kayoed Vargas and Mayorga...Cotto hasn't stopped one fighter or even hurt an opponent with a granite chin since he's been at WW...
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
I would like to see Pac fight both Cotto and Mosley. But maybe he should fight Mosley first as he is older but I've just read the interview with Roach (below) and he is convinced he needs to fight someone under 30 to prove he has what it takes at 147.
Roach out to silence Pacman critics! | Fightnews - Boxing News Updated 24/7
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
For everyone saying Cotto is the weaker opponent and everything.
Put Mosley in there with a young gun like Clottey and not someone who telegraphs everything he throws and see how much better he looks against Clottey then Cotto. It's sort of amazing how he blitzes Margarito who is someone tailor made for him to look spectacular against and people forget the trouble he had with Mayorga. Clottey is a different kind of beast at this stage then Margarito . If you put Clottey in with Shane you'd probably see Shane have a lot of trouble too and then you'd be flip flopping who was the weakest.
I personally think that anyone that is behind a Cotto vs Pacquiao fight or a Mosley vs Pacquiao fight can't hate on Mayweather for fighting Marquez.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TRIGGERMAN
Pac-Cotto is bigger event than Pac-Mosley. And why would team pac take a big-risk-low-reward fight?
:confused:
He beat DLH and refuses a fight with a guy who beat him twice? No reward?
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Being under 30 doesn't equal greatness nor does insisting on a catchweight.:cool:
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Being under 30 doesn't equal greatness nor does insisting on a catchweight.:cool:
Oh I totally agree. I am just looking at the big picture and saying which way I think it will go judging from what Freddie has said.
I think a lot of fighters actually get better after 30 especially ones that rely on boxing brains rather than the kind who use natural athleticism and skill. I think 2 good examples are B-Hop and RJJ, 2 of the greatest boxers of the last generation but Hopkins had the better final straight so to speak, as he relied on his brain more than Jones whereas when Jones lost that razor sharp speed he got taught the hard way then had to go back to the drawing board and improve his thinking game but was never the same.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tysonbruno
Shane has said he will take 40/60 split in Pacquiao's favour he will come down to 144lbs Shane is the number 1 Welterweight in the world surely this fight would be bigger than Pacquiao vs Cotto and i would love to see Mosley vs Pacquiao who is with me??
I agree Pac vs Mosley is the better fight, but the best fights don't always get made and sad to say they are looking out for Pac's best interests in not going with that fight now. Even if Mosley is getting long in the tooth, he still presents Pac with a huge challenge, too huge when fights like Cotto can be made for smaller risk.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
For everyone saying Cotto is the weaker opponent and everything.
Put Mosley in there with a young gun like Clottey and not someone who telegraphs everything he throws and see how much better he looks against Clottey then Cotto. It's sort of amazing how he blitzes Margarito who is someone tailor made for him to look spectacular against and people forget the trouble he had with Mayorga. Clottey is a different kind of beast at this stage then Margarito . If you put Clottey in with Shane you'd probably see Shane have a lot of trouble too and then you'd be flip flopping who was the weakest.
I personally think that anyone that is behind a Cotto vs Pacquiao fight or a Mosley vs Pacquiao fight can't hate on Mayweather for fighting Marquez.
Shane fought Margarito then same way he fought collazo he stood toe to toe and was willing to trade. I fail to see the logic in saying that mosley would look bad against clottey just because cotto looked bad. And now Margarito was tailor made? Must be why he was the favorite, why he shitted on cotto, cintron twice, clottey too three young guns with his telegraphed punches. And what does the mayorga fight have to do with anything? So if he had and off night or found it difficult against an awkward opponent, didnt he fucking stop Mayorga at 154?
As far as PBF v JMM, I don't have a problem with it because JMM is better than PAC anyhow, I'd just rather see JMM take a tune up above 140 before jumping in with a rested floyd. And I think PBF v Shane is the best legacy fight out there for any of them. All the others are simply about money first, legacy a distant second.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
For everyone saying Cotto is the weaker opponent and everything.
Put Mosley in there with a young gun like Clottey and not someone who telegraphs everything he throws and see how much better he looks against Clottey then Cotto. It's sort of amazing how he blitzes Margarito who is someone tailor made for him to look spectacular against and people forget the trouble he had with Mayorga. Clottey is a different kind of beast at this stage then Margarito . If you put Clottey in with Shane you'd probably see Shane have a lot of trouble too and then you'd be flip flopping who was the weakest.
I personally think that anyone that is behind a Cotto vs Pacquiao fight or a Mosley vs Pacquiao fight can't hate on Mayweather for fighting Marquez.
I seem to remember, that blitz, came after Margarito was hurt, but I'll take a look again myself.
Because, I think your overrating Mosley in his fight against Margarito just a bit too much in comparison.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Roach isn't putting Pacquiao against Mosley because Mosley has very very good power and a very good chin.
Cotto is the easier fight stylistically for Pacquiao because he can be hurt. In his last fight Cotto appeared to not be the same mentally since the Margarito fight and of course, Roach has spotted this.
Then again, Cotto looking vulnerable against Clottey could all be do to with Clottey being a very tough opponent.
I still think Cotto beats Pacquiao but Pacquiao winning wouldn't surprise me.
Against Mosley, I don't see him winning but then again, i can't count Pacquiao out.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Now yal are finally startn to Hear Jimmy Like in White Men Cant Jump..Exactly,I said this long time ago.Now how this should go down is...Pac wants to be welterweight champ,Mosley the only way through that door.So what let Mosley destroy Pac,Thats not the big pic.Everybody says Floyd would do the same thing so whats the big deal.?I will tell you,Floyd Holds what welterweight tiltle,,Dont worry I'll wait....None.So Y would Floyds fight be more exciting than two Champs.Pacs a Champ Shane a Champ..The big pic for me is tricking Floyd back to Fighting 147 like he suppose too.Ok check real quick then im gone.I dont care wether its Cotto or Mosley,they fight pac steal the light fro him,now Pretty boy gotta fight one of them at 147.Now heres the sweet part,Magarita is back,an you know Paul Williams wanna get in on that action,pretty boy is trapped,an Who dont wanna See Pretty Boy An Williams,Thats the fight i wanna see,since he so good an all....PEACE LUV AN HAIR Grease,MJ,RIP.
-
Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JonesJrMayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
For everyone saying Cotto is the weaker opponent and everything.
Put Mosley in there with a young gun like Clottey and not someone who telegraphs everything he throws and see how much better he looks against Clottey then Cotto. It's sort of amazing how he blitzes Margarito who is someone tailor made for him to look spectacular against and people forget the trouble he had with Mayorga. Clottey is a different kind of beast at this stage then Margarito . If you put Clottey in with Shane you'd probably see Shane have a lot of trouble too and then you'd be flip flopping who was the weakest.
I personally think that anyone that is behind a Cotto vs Pacquiao fight or a Mosley vs Pacquiao fight can't hate on Mayweather for fighting Marquez.
Shane fought Margarito then same way he fought collazo he stood toe to toe and was willing to trade. I fail to see the logic in saying that mosley would look bad against clottey just because cotto looked bad. And now Margarito was tailor made? Must be why he was the favorite, why he shitted on cotto, cintron twice, clottey too three young guns with his telegraphed punches. And what does the mayorga fight have to do with anything? So if he had and off night or found it difficult against an awkward opponent, didnt he fucking stop Mayorga at 154?
As far as PBF v JMM, I don't have a problem with it because JMM is better than PAC anyhow, I'd just rather see JMM take a tune up above 140 before jumping in with a rested floyd.
And I think PBF v Shane is the best legacy fight out there for any of them. All the others are simply about money first, legacy a distant second.
Agreed to an extent. PBF v. Shane needs to happen. It needed to happen before and it needs to happen now. Actually, scratch that, PBF v. any legitimate welter needed to happen before and needs to happen now, but PBF v. Pacman is a pretty big legacy fight too.
Pacman versus any legitimate welter at above 145 isn't something to laugh at either. If Pac fights and beats Cotto and anything above 145, that is a big legacy fight although not quite as big as the one mentioned above.
