Yes it was a good performance
as good as mayweather?
Is america just looking too hard for another superstar?
Printable View
Yes it was a good performance
as good as mayweather?
Is america just looking too hard for another superstar?
I'm not, I can't stand Ward, and in my book he'll never be a "superstar" (except in his own mind)Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
One can only imagine how much the Brits would be overrating Froch had it gone the other way. Look how much you all were overrating him before the fight even happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
I've yet to hear a single person say Ward is as good as Mayweather, btw. Straw man.
Floyd and ward dont belong in the same sentence..
Ward is has a style that works but he's not exciting at all . Hes not a superstar material.
Let's look elsewhere..
Well I strongly disagree with you guys, I feel like Ward has superstar written all over him. He's a humble kid with great boxing skills, sure he's not mayweather but he's on his way. He is without doubt the king of the middleweight tourny. This kid IMO will do great things. He already has Froch, Abraham, Bika, Green, Kessler (the tournys fav) miranda under his belt.. And he's still a young fighter at 27 would love to see him take out Bute now.
Froch as awkward as he is and looks is prob the most likely to ever beat ward in all fareness, he strength and tough roughness did him very well. If froch had a better inside game I honestly think he would have beat him.
People say froch got best easy but he didn't, he hit ward plenty with soft punches and alot of body shots.
I thought it was a good fight and ward is now the man and will become #1 p4p and that means froch is fucking good
Aren't you the blind man who gave Froch 5 rounds? Apologies if I've got the wrong guy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dropanuke
It was an 11-1 or a 10-2 fight. Pretty dominant, IMO; and not clear that Froch is even the best opponent that Ward has faced (may be Kessler).
Yes I'm the guy who saw 2 scores of 15-13 twice and were not uk so yeah who's blind
Tut tut
You and those two judges. Like every boxing writer and everyone on this forum (besides you) agrees. Read around a bit - no one else thinks those cards were halfway sane.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dropanuke
But they were official!!!
And come on Americans don't get it wrong do they??? Exactly!!!!
Now reply
Night night lol
There's nothing overrated about wards performance, it was fully clinical and he deserves to claim the number one spot. Nobody has beaten Froch convincgly and I seriously think Ward will continue winning the big fights. Reading Glen McCrory's comments on sky sports you really do have to agree with what he is saying about how good actually Ward was is and his adivce to Khan about how well he handled Froch, a truely professional and dominant performance, he talked about Khan wanting to prove about his chin and showboating and how it was unnecessary at the world level, you do have to agree with what he says and Khan has proven his chin, heneeds to take a leaf out of Wards book and what he did on the night. the peformance that he did last night was sensational and he really proved he was the best in the weight last night. I'm looking forward to seeing ward, he really is good.
Ward may be P4P #1 when Pac and Floyd retire. He's a huge talent imo
Ward is very good, and great at executing his gameplan. He's fast, smart in there, good defensively and has a good jab.
He's also a headbutter and one of the dirtiest fighters in boxing.
And he doesn't have one punch power, and probably never will.
That adds up to him not being all that exciting, and a bit of a spoiler in the same vain as Winky Wright.
I don't have the same nationalistic blindness as you, my friend. American judges get it wrong plenty of times, including this time. Pretty sure American judges were the ones who gifted the Lara fight to Paul Williams too. Not sure if you think you're scoring points with that comment or "just having a laugh" as you say over there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dropanuke
The British judge got it just about right -- slightly generous.
To me that adds up (and looks like) a fighter in the same vein as Hopkins, not Wright. (Did you really think Wright was dirty? He also didn't fight inside.)Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
if i remember correctly everyone including the brits were saying ward would win a ud, i dont think anyone was overrating froch before the fightQuote:
Originally Posted by shzaOne can only imagine how much the Brits would be overrating Froch had it gone the other way. Look how much you all were overrating him before the fight even happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
I've yet to hear a single person say Ward is as good as Mayweather, btw. Straw man.
i was the only one saying froch would win but ill tell you England will win the next world cup :)
what does straw man mean?
and by the way Froch won more than one or 2 rounds, being harsh he won 3
it was a very good performance by ward but superstar?
Ward is a class act!that's the first time av seen froch seriously struggle.ward has everything in the build up to the fight it wos made out froch would b so much stronger a bully ward about but it turned out to b the complete opposite and i think that's wot really threw Carl.alot ov guys on here rate Sergio Martinez in there top 3 p4p in my opinion ward is far superior and go as far to say ad only hav him behind mayweather
Ward is good at what he does but not interesting to watch. He mauls and does his work in spurts while trying to grab or hold.
I used to say it about Froch before hegot my resepect but he looked like all the things I used to moan about him. Loading up on wide slow shots, being left looking at thin air and thinking he can get away with the low left and high shoulder.
Im not sure it would have won him the fit but I think jad he just worked like Calzaghe then the fight would have been alot closer. Maybe he really believes his own talk about his power?
Had that been the Calzaghe that fought Kessler instead of Froch, Ward would not have been allowed to hold so easy. A few of Frochs jabs got smack right in Wards face so its not like hes unhitable either. Its such a shame this tournament wasnt around a few years ago while Calzaghe was active!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
Yeah so we could see him didge some more prime fighters and hear his excuses as to why he can't participate. Maybe because he has a lucrative bout with Sven Ottke or something of the sort. God that guy was such a waste of fucking talent.
I agree with the rest of your post though ;)
Hulk is spot on. Ward isn't over rated but I doubt he'll become a star..He executes perfectly but it isn't always pretty and casual fans won't appreciate the intelligent boxing tricks he throws in. Also not a K.O puncher. Floyd and Pacquiao are more exciting to the casual fan and hit harder. Shame really because Ward looks very hard to beat
funnyQuote:
Originally Posted by AlthugzQuote:
Originally Posted by ross
Yeah so we could see him didge some more prime fighters and hear his excuses as to why he can't participate. Maybe because he has a lucrative bout with Sven Ottke or something of the sort. God that guy was such a waste of fucking talent.
I agree with the rest of your post though ;)
Hulk is spot on. Ward isn't over rated but I doubt he'll become a star..He executes perfectly but it isn't always pretty and casual fans won't appreciate the intelligent boxing tricks he throws in. Also not a K.O puncher. Floyd and Pacquiao are more exciting to the casual fan and hit harder. Shame really because Ward looks very hard to beat
If anything Ward is under rated!!! He's the Super Six Winner and the olympic gold medal winner!!! He's humble and maybe a bit boring and no matter how it went down HE BEAT FROCH.
GIVE THIS MAN HIS RESPECT
Ward can only be overrated if you didn't think too highly of Froch and Kessler prior to Ward's victories. Now the world is annointing Ward as the next big thing because of wins over good, but not great, fighters. I'm of that mindset. Frankly, that is where I stand and that is why I agree with Erics that Ward is being overrated. I just think too much is being made out of beating Froch and Kessler. That Ward has been proclaimed fighter of the year for beating Froch says a lot about this year's combatants.
I have said a few times that I felt Kessler was overrated and how it was strange that he became so famous by a loss to Calzaghe where he was only competitive for three maybe four rounds of a twelve round fight.
Froch is a good fighter. He's a brave fighter and he does his country proud. I'm a big fan of Froch. If more fighters had the mettle that he does, we'd have better boxing. However, Froch is not a great fighter because he is just not athletic enough. His best win was over Pascal because what Pascal has done since then. Froch didn't look resoundingly brilliant against Johnson or against Taylor. He got those wins because that is the kind of fighter Froch is and you can't discount that. Believing in yourself is an underrated trait in boxing. If Froch had the natural athletic ability to match his ring intelligence and grit, the man would be a great, but he is just limited athletically. The Ward fight showed as much. Froch couldn't figure out Ward's speed.
For Ward fans who believe he is ranked where he should be, am I correct that you feel strongly that Froch and Kessler are very good? I'll say this, and for anyone who has seen my posts in the past, if Bute loses to Froch, I'll eat crow. I'll admit Ward is that good and he is ranked where he should be. If Bute beats Froch, I believe my point stands. If Bute stops Froch or dominates Froch more than Ward, please get over the Ward bias and move Bute up above Ward in super middleweight standings because against every single one of their common opponents, Bute has looked better.
As to the scoring of the fight, I had Froch winning four rounds, but I'll admit I need to rewatch it. At the time, I had round 3, 9, 11 and 12 to Froch. The fact that the Showtime announcers were more annoyingly biased than I've heard announcers be in a long while may have persuaded me to give Froch close rounds. It was ridiculous. Usually, there is a good cop/bad cop thing going on where one announcer pleads one boxer's case and the other pleads his opponent's, but I don't think I heard one single compliment of Froch or one single criticism of Ward the whole telecast. Come on fellas. I also didn't like Ward's excessive holding in the final stanzas. By my own admission though, I gave any close rounds to Froch. The other 8 rounds, Ward clearly won. So, 8-4 Ward or Ward 116-112.
Considering where the rest of the fighters are today, Ward is ahead of the game. It doesnt make him a superstar. Is he being overrated, I can't say that. Only because, the way he's fighting, his longevity will make him seem like a great fighter because he's out smarted much of the rest of his class. He's got good movement, ring generalship and effectively slips punches. He minimizes his weakness by crowding other fighters and taking leverage and power off their punches.
When he first started doing his Roy Jones Impersonation, he got dropped a few times. So he made adjustments and fights smarter. On the inside, using things like his head, elbows, forearms and that Stiff arm he used a couple of times against Froch. He fights off the break but can be outboxed from a distance. So he crowds, mauls, and gets off first and gets out of range.
I was a fan of neither before this fight. Sadly, I still came away with more respect for Froch being a gentleman in defeat than I did for Wards stylized dirty boxing.
I think it's funny that people think butte is great for beating no one, yet ward is overrated for beating everyone. Dude has the belts, the fancy lil super six cup and people can still dig and find something negative to say about the guy. Amazing. Instead of this crying about ward being overrated, not great, boring how about use that energy to find a way to beat the guy. He mauls and fouls his way to a win over and over we all know it's coming but fighters still go in there loose just to complain about it. If ward is overrated , then i hate to see the opinion of the rest of the division. They must be horrible. Im not a ward fan hell i acutally think without the hugging at the end of the fight froch would have won, but all the negative about a guy none of these guys can beat is funny
No one is annointing Bute as the next master boxer. No one has Bute in their top 5 p4p. Bute isn't ranked by most people including yourself. How then could he be overrated?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mar
For beating Froch and Kessler, Ward has emerged as the next great star of boxing in many commentators minds. My point is: maybe that is true, but it depends on how good Froch and Kessler really are. First off, they're clearly quality level boxers, but are wins over them enough to catapult Ward to top 5 p4p status?
I've always thought Kessler was overrated (he's clearly good though don't get me wrong) and became famous because of the first three rounds of the Calzaghe fight. Froch has a great win over Pascal, but the Dirrell fight was horrible and Taylor had already been dethroned when Froch faced him. If Froch beats Bute, then you have a solid point. No debate. If Bute steamrolls through Froch, then we don't really know how good Ward is yet, right? Until Froch goes on to get other big wins over good foes etc. Froch lost to Kessler before fighting Ward even though I thought it was a tight match.
This will be decided in the next few years. To be fair, wins over Froch and Kessler should get you something. While neither was a p4p fighter when Ward beat them, they are both quality boxers. Usually, you have to beat a p4p fighter to get into the top 5 p4p or move around in weight. Ward hasn't moved around in weight either. Ward should probably be in the top ten for those wins. No doubt. So, maybe it's really just a few spots here or there I'm talking about...
I think "usually" is putting it way too strongly. Ideally, yes; but in reality, I'm not sure that's how it typically goes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rantcatrat
I think Floyd, Manny, and Donaire are the only people on most people's top 10 lists that have beaten another top 10 p4p fighter. Hopkins too, if you have him there.
And the only other guys who have moved up in weight (but have never beaten a top p4p fighter) are JMM and Martinez. But I don't think that going up in weight is a major reason anyone rates those guys -- it has to do more with how they look when they fight.
Wlad, Vitali, Ponjangkam, Bradley and Ward fit neither of these criteria (I'm not counting Bradley's couple of whatever fights at 147 as meaningful) and they are the other folks that appear on most people's top 10 lists. Same thing for honorable mentions like Gamboa and Rios.
For me, "how good were Kessler and Froch, really?" is only half of the competition question. The full question is "how do those guys compare to: (a) Montiel and Darchinyan at the time Donaire beat them (I think probably not quite as good); (b) Williams, Pavlik and Dzinziruk when Martinez beat them (I think a little better).
And then beyond the competition question is the question of how talented he actually *looks* in the ring. E.g., even if Roy Jones had stayed at 160 and fought no one but B-Class fighters his whole career, it would be hard to deny his world-class talent. I think there, both Donaire and Martinez shade Ward.
But the fact that these questions are all so close leads me to conclude that there's nothing *crazy* about rating Ward as high as #5 -- or even 3 or 4.
I mean, who is the best fighter that JMM has actually beaten? A shot Barrera in what was still a close fight?
Martinez beat Paul Williams when Paul Williams was ranked p4p. Pavlik was the lineal middleweight champion of the world when he fought Martinez and Martinez was going up in weight from 154 to 160. Martinez was the underdog too. Dzinziruk was the top dog at 154 when he fought Martinez. But, I'm a Martinez fan so I'm partial. Froch wasn't in the p4p rankings when he fought Ward, neither was Kessler. In fact, Froch wasn't even the second-highest ranked super middleweight when Ward fought him, Bute was.Quote:
Originally Posted by shzaI think "usually" is putting it way too strongly. Ideally, yes; but in reality, I'm not sure that's how it typically goes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rantcatrat
I think Floyd, Manny, and Donaire are the only people on most people's top 10 lists that have beaten another top 10 p4p fighter. Hopkins too, if you have him there.
And the only other guys who have moved up in weight (but have never beaten a top p4p fighter) are JMM and Martinez. But I don't think that going up in weight is a major reason anyone rates those guys -- it has to do more with how they look when they fight.
Wlad, Vitali, Ponjangkam, Bradley and Ward fit neither of these criteria (I'm not counting Bradley's couple of whatever fights at 147 as meaningful) and they are the other folks that appear on most people's top 10 lists. Same thing for honorable mentions like Gamboa and Rios.
For me, "how good were Kessler and Froch, really?" is only half of the competition question. The full question is "how do those guys compare to: (a) Montiel and Darchinyan at the time Donaire beat them (I think probably not quite as good); (b) Williams, Pavlik and Dzinziruk when Martinez beat them (I think a little better).
And then beyond the competition question is the question of how talented he actually *looks* in the ring. E.g., even if Roy Jones had stayed at 160 and fought no one but B-Class fighters his whole career, it would be hard to deny his world-class talent. I think there, both Donaire and Martinez shade Ward.
But the fact that these questions are all so close leads me to conclude that there's nothing *crazy* about rating Ward as high as #5 -- or even 3 or 4.
I mean, who is the best fighter that JMM has actually beaten? A shot Barrera in what was still a close fight?
I see your point though and it's all subjective.
A little bit overrated?
Ward wouldn't beat Jermain taylor. Taylor was giving Forch a much bigger beating than ward was, he just tired, so credit for Ward not tiring as much (he was dipping) but been rumours for years Taylor has something wrong with him that causes him to tire.
Considering the massive speed advantage Ward had over Froch, I thought that was a very good performances, nothing special.
Special I think what Roy did to Lights out, what Calzaghe did to Lacey, What Maywather did to Corrales.
No one was really giving Froch much more than a punchers chance in the fight going into it. Ward is a damn good fighter but that wasn't a superstar performance or a p4p top 10, I really doubt he would be Ol' bad intentions, he won't have the power to get a lucky late punch off to scrape a win.
No. He deserve to replace JMM's previous spot.
http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...26899099_n.jpg
Ward vs froch was closer than people thought, I mean people say froch got dominated but it was froch that was landing body shots at will he just got caught with too many counters but ward was awful to watch but beating froch has made him a great.
I'm not a big fan of Ward's style but if he were to beat Bute he will have had a very good 3 year run.