-
Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Frazier #6 and or Ali maybe #7---because those 5 in the title of this thread really FOUGHT their opponents and didnt run (though Lewis maybe did a bit too much hugging)
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
The All-Time List
#1 .... Jack Dempsey
#2 .... Joe Louis
#3 .... Larry Holmes
#4 .... James J. Jeffries
#5 .... Rocky Marciano
#6 .... Lennox Lewis
#7 .... George Foreman
#8 .... Jack Johnson
#9 .... Muhammad Ali
#10 .. Gene Tunney
Based upon > talent, era, competition, public appeal and historical content.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
excellent ranking there Bill. I agree about Dempsey. He should be right in there maybe ahead of Lennox. Now that I think about it. Yeah, Lennox #6, then you know guys like Ezzard, Walcott, Liston, Schmeling---- funny how nobody ever puts those 4 guys in any rankings. Every one of them woulda gave Ali fits and probably beaten Ali.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Joe Louis is A #1 the Greatest of All-Time...25 consecutive successful title defenses in a row. Unmatched, unparalleled, and hands down the best. Shouldn't even be a discussion
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Ali was the greatest.
ALI BOOMAYE ALI BOOMAYE
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Ali was the greatest.
ALI BOOMAYE ALI BOOMAYE
Cassius was 'flattened' by Sonji Roi.
Sonji Roi >
"Cassius is still a little boy. He needs more seasoning. I've had better."
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bill Paxtom
"Cassius is still a little boy. He needs more seasoning. I've had better."
Scorned lover
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Ali
Louis
Holmes
Tyson
Lewis
-
1. Ali
2. Louis
3. Holmes
4. Evander
5. Frazier
6. Lewis
7. Foreman
8. Wlad
9. Dempsey
10. Marciano
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bill Paxtom
The All-Time List
#1 .... Jack Dempsey
#2 .... Joe Louis
#3 .... Larry Holmes
#4 .... James J. Jeffries
#5 .... Rocky Marciano
#6 .... Lennox Lewis
#7 .... George Foreman
#8 .... Jack Johnson
#9 .... Muhammad Ali
#10 .. Gene Tunney
Based upon > talent, era, competition, public appeal and historical content.
bassed on all those things surely Ali needs to be number 1?
bassed soley on boxing tallent then there would be a strong argument against him being number 1
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mikeeod
1. Ali
2. Louis
3. Holmes
4. Evander
5. Frazier
6. Lewis
7. Foreman
8. Wlad
9. Dempsey
10. Marciano
Lewis would beat Frazier every time
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
just caNnot see evander and smokin joe ahead of foreman and marciano. Rocky would beat frazier AND holy (Marciano would to holy what he did to ezzard) and Foreman would BLOW AWAY EVANDER IN HIS PRIME 1973.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
I don't think Frazier is a top 10 HW to be honest.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Wlad?
for fucks sake, we can have at least 1 serious thread every now and again you know, we dont have to fuck about like children all the time
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Joe Frazier
Unfortunately, Joe doesn't make the Top 10.
Ezzard Charles is right there with Joe in the Top 15.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bill Paxtom
Joe Frazier
Unfortunately, Joe doesn't make the Top 10.
Ezzard Charles is right there with Joe in the Top 15.
yes and Rocco would pound them to sand inside 8 rounds both.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
I always put Foreman higher on the list than most. To me he is a quintessential great. I was born too late to watch him live but did get to enjoy his comeback. I also have a George Foreman grill.
I do realize every time I rank him I can't say unbiased as I'm a Foreman nuthugger but I do believe a decent argument could be raised by many to justify having Foreman higher than I often see. I could watch his fights on YouTube all day and I am in the middle of watching when we were Kings for the thrice time. I'm sure we all have fighters we feel that way about.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
I always put Foreman higher on the list than most. To me he is a quintessential great. I was born too late to watch him love but did get to enjoy his comeback. I also have a George Foreman grill.
I do realize every time I rank him I can't say unbiased as I'm a Foreman nuthugger but I do believe a decent argument could be raised by many to justify having Foreman higher than I often see. I could watch his fights on YouTube all day and I am in the middle of watching when we were Kings for the thrice time. I'm sure we all have fighters we feel that way about.
Rocky Marciano and then 2nd for me is George Foreman. I am mesmerized by the concept of sheer brutish power, and how it nullifies (usually) all the gay ballerina bullcrap in one single shot or 2.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Frazier beats Rocky and would have a great fight with Evander Holyfield. Joe does probably lose to Lennox.
Foreman was not a great champion neither was Holyfield.
Ezzard Charles is the greatest light heavyweight ever not heavyweight.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Frazier beats Rocky and would have a great fight with Evander Holyfield. Joe does probably lose to Lennox.
Foreman was not a great champion neither was Holyfield.
Ezzard Charles is the greatest light heavyweight ever not heavyweight.
Better than The Mongoose?
YOu think Frazier beats Rocky? I think Frazier cannot REACH Rocky with the left, Rocky would turn so sideways that Joe wouldnt reach him with that hook AT ALL Rock would come underneath after Joe missed wildly, and break all his ribs on his left side. I can see it now. Frazier had a pissy right hand.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Frazier had a pissy right hand.
Until the very end of his career.
Amazing how Joe Frazier virtually a 1 armed fighter won so much and vs good competition as well.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Frazier beats Rocky and would have a great fight with Evander Holyfield. Joe does probably lose to Lennox.
Foreman was not a great champion neither was Holyfield.
Ezzard Charles is the greatest light heavyweight ever not heavyweight.
Better than The Mongoose?
YOu think Frazier beats Rocky? I think Frazier cannot REACH Rocky with the left, Rocky would turn so sideways that Joe wouldnt reach him with that hook AT ALL Rock would come underneath after Joe missed wildly, and break all his ribs on his left side. I can see it now. Frazier had a pissy right hand.
Joe was bigger than Rocky and Joe was a great champion.
Charles beat Moore so yes.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mikeeod
1. Ali
2. Louis
3. Holmes
4. Evander
5. Frazier
6. Lewis
7. Foreman
8. Wlad
9. Dempsey
10. Marciano
Lewis would beat Frazier every time
I don't rank off perceived head to head match ups. Frazier won the Fight of the Century vs. Ali and was dominant until the much larger Foreman came along. Frazier unified and erased all doubt as to his place as the champ and beat ATG Ali when he was undefeated.
I can see people rank Lennox higher, but for me the blowout losses to McCall and Rahman hurt his standing. If you can get over it and justify ranking him higher, sweet. Also think his shaky chin and Fraziers aggression and big left hook don't make it as one sided or non-competitive as you think...
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
just caNnot see evander and smokin joe ahead of foreman and marciano. Rocky would beat frazier AND holy (Marciano would to holy what he did to ezzard) and Foreman would BLOW AWAY EVANDER IN HIS PRIME 1973.
Foreman made like, two defenses during his prime. Evander was MUCH larger than Charles and Ezzard was never the same after killing a man in the ring. That being said, both fights Charles was right there with Marciano, despite being well past his prime. Evander is probably the greatest counter punching heavy ever, even stated by Tyson, and would have chewed Marciano up. Not even worth discussing further.
Evander struggled with clever boxers or MUCH larger men who were mobile and fought tall. I think he beats a younger Foreman worse than he did the one he beat in 1992. Back on topic though and not focusing on head to head competition, I like Evander's historical wins over Bowe and Tyson, his accomplishment of being a multiple (3x) time heavyweight champ (lineal), and his quality of opposition more than what Foreman and Marciano accomplished.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mikeeod
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
just caNnot see evander and smokin joe ahead of foreman and marciano. Rocky would beat frazier AND holy (Marciano would to holy what he did to ezzard) and Foreman would BLOW AWAY EVANDER IN HIS PRIME 1973.
Foreman made like, two defenses during his prime. Evander was MUCH larger than Charles and Ezzard was never the same after killing a man in the ring. That being said, both fights Charles was right there with Marciano, despite being well past his prime. Evander is probably the greatest counter punching heavy ever, even stated by Tyson, and would have chewed Marciano up. Not even worth discussing further.
Evander struggled with clever boxers or MUCH larger men who were mobile and fought tall. I think he beats a younger Foreman worse than he did the one he beat in 1992. Back on topic though and not focusing on head to head competition, I like Evander's historical wins over Bowe and Tyson, his accomplishment of being a multiple (3x) time heavyweight champ (lineal), and his quality of opposition more than what Foreman and Marciano accomplished.
Excellent points but look at how he tarnished his career by fighting way too long and losing to Larry Donald, James to ney , Sherman WMD, john Ruiz, etc. Too many losses and now look at Marciano's record.
-
Re: Foreman, Louis, Marciano, Lewis, Holmes 5 greatest of All Time
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mikeeod
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
just caNnot see evander and smokin joe ahead of foreman and marciano. Rocky would beat frazier AND holy (Marciano would to holy what he did to ezzard) and Foreman would BLOW AWAY EVANDER IN HIS PRIME 1973.
Foreman made like, two defenses during his prime. Evander was MUCH larger than Charles and Ezzard was never the same after killing a man in the ring. That being said, both fights Charles was right there with Marciano, despite being well past his prime. Evander is probably the greatest counter punching heavy ever, even stated by Tyson, and would have chewed Marciano up. Not even worth discussing further.
Evander struggled with clever boxers or MUCH larger men who were mobile and fought tall. I think he beats a younger Foreman worse than he did the one he beat in 1992. Back on topic though and not focusing on head to head competition, I like Evander's historical wins over Bowe and Tyson, his accomplishment of being a multiple (3x) time heavyweight champ (lineal), and his quality of opposition more than what Foreman and Marciano accomplished.
Excellent points but look at how he tarnished his career by fighting way too long and losing to Larry Donald, James to ney , Sherman WMD, john Ruiz, etc. Too many losses and now look at Marciano's record.
Do we fault guys for sticking around too long now, or reward them for what they accomplished? Robinson stuck around and had some unsightly losses late in his career. Are you suggesting that Joe Calzaghe and Finito Lopez should be ranked higher historically?!?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mikeeod
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mikeeod
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
just caNnot see evander and smokin joe ahead of foreman and marciano. Rocky would beat frazier AND holy (Marciano would to holy what he did to ezzard) and Foreman would BLOW AWAY EVANDER IN HIS PRIME 1973.
Foreman made like, two defenses during his prime. Evander was MUCH larger than Charles and Ezzard was never the same after killing a man in the ring. That being said, both fights Charles was right there with Marciano, despite being well past his prime. Evander is probably the greatest counter punching heavy ever, even stated by Tyson, and would have chewed Marciano up. Not even worth discussing further.
Evander struggled with clever boxers or MUCH larger men who were mobile and fought tall. I think he beats a younger Foreman worse than he did the one he beat in 1992. Back on topic though and not focusing on head to head competition, I like Evander's historical wins over Bowe and Tyson, his accomplishment of being a multiple (3x) time heavyweight champ (lineal), and his quality of opposition more than what Foreman and Marciano accomplished.
Excellent points but look at how he tarnished his career by fighting way too long and losing to Larry Donald, James to ney , Sherman WMD, john Ruiz, etc. Too many losses and now look at Marciano's record.
Do we fault guys for sticking around too long now, or reward them for what they accomplished? Robinson stuck around and had some unsightly losses late in his career. Are you suggesting that Joe Calzaghe and Finito Lopez should be ranked higher historically?!?
Lopez and calzaghe? NO WAY!!
