Printable View
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOkwqnLKSqM
It's in Spanish, but it's a podcast with Erik Morales, in which Margacheato is stating his case for admittance into the HOF (:lolhaha:), undoubtedly spurred on my Miguel Cotto's induction (heh-heh).
He even says he plans to sue for that right.
To that I say...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP-7Y82R6HY
;D ;D
I'm glad his cheating ways are coming back to bite him in the ass.
Margarcheato look suprsingly decent as a woman
https://scontent.fman2-1.fna.fbcdn.n...5g&oe=6213E6A7
Make up your mind about others
https://scontent.fman2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...aQ&oe=6213F213
https://scontent.fman2-1.fna.fbcdn.n...wA&oe=6215638A
https://scontent.fman2-1.fna.fbcdn.n...ZA&oe=62153F37
https://scontent.fman2-1.fna.fbcdn.n...eA&oe=621455CF
https://scontent.fman2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...oQ&oe=62154EF1
https://scontent.fman2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...mA&oe=62150A67
https://scontent.fman2-1.fna.fbcdn.n...9w&oe=6213EFF7
https://scontent.fman2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...Kg&oe=6215A57F
https://scontent.fman2-1.fna.fbcdn.n...RQ&oe=621423B7
https://scontent.fman2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...Yw&oe=62158798
https://scontent.fman2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...jA&oe=62146455
https://scontent.fman2-1.fna.fbcdn.n...mQ&oe=62147777
Wouldn’t mind getting into “Wladette’s Klit”
https://www.wionews.com/photos/5-rea...faceapp-236905
That being said, Cheato, Fury, Manny, Miguel, and Floyd make for pretty hideous women. ;D
Ha! Froch, Fury and Manny... Minging.Quote:
Originally Posted by Denilson3.0
Not gonna lie, Brook, Khan, Margarito and Canelo look hot as chicks!Quote:
Originally Posted by BeanzHa! Froch, Fury and Manny... Minging.Quote:
Originally Posted by Denilson3.0
Are we sure that's an app for Paulie ;D. Just shaved the stubble and fixed the weave between rounds again. And Hearn looks like she'd kidnap you and tie you to a bed. In a bad way :-X
i don't think antonio deserves to be in the hall. i don't think he did enough but there are others in there who's records aren't that great
I look at the inductees of the last six years or so... and the only names I'd raise an eyebrow on are the likes of Tony DeMarco and maybe an Eddie Booker.
The rest are extremely deserving.
To let in a cheating scumbag like Margarito would totally soil the IBHOF.
depends on the context. i know it is call hall of fame but for me for boxers it should be the very best. guys arturo, barry, boom boom shouldn't be in there. there are better fighters who have missed out. what fight did antonio cheat in? how many ped cheats are in there?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICdepends on the context. i know it is call hall of fame but for me for boxers it should be the very best. guys arturo, barry, boom boom shouldn't be in there. there are better fighters who have missed out. what fight did antonio cheat in? Google it. how many ped cheats are in there? You tell me. Figures you'd be defending a lowlife cheat.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Margacheato's cheating is well documented. Look it up.
If you think Cheato belongs in the IBHOF, that is your prerogative. Of course with your list of fav fighters, I wouldn't expect anything else. ;)
what fight did antonio cheat in? you claimed he is a cheating scumbag. so what fight? i already said i don't think antonio deserves to be in the hall as i don't think he did enoughQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICdepends on the context. i know it is call hall of fame but for me for boxers it should be the very best. guys arturo, barry, boom boom shouldn't be in there. there are better fighters who have missed out. what fight did antonio cheat in? Google it. how many ped cheats are in there? You tell me. Figures you'd be defending a lowlife cheat.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Margacheato's cheating is well documented. Look it up.
If you think Cheato belongs in the IBHOF, that is your prerogative. Of course with your list of fav fighters, I wouldn't expect anything else. ;)
Margarito was caught cheating in the Mosley fight. Imagine how many others he may have done it in and the damage he inflicted. It is criminal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Thank you. But as someone who presumably follows boxing I'm sure he knew that.
so antonio cheated in the shane fight? i'm not asking what you imagine. what fight did he cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
i thought they allegedly found something wrong with antonio's wraps before the shane fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Thank you. But as someone who presumably follows boxing I'm sure he knew that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICi thought they allegedly found something wrong with antonio's wraps before the shane fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Thank you. But as someone who presumably follows boxing I'm sure he knew that.
In... the... Shane... fight.
Whether or not it was before the fight, he was caught cheating. Any other questions?
so it wasn't in the fight? he may have allegedly been caught trying to cheat but he never actually cheated in the fight? so what fight did he cheat in? shane & team must have agreed that everything was ok for the fight to go forth yeh?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICi thought they allegedly found something wrong with antonio's wraps before the shane fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Thank you. But as someone who presumably follows boxing I'm sure he knew that.
In... the... Shane... fight.
Whether or not it was before the fight, he was caught cheating. Any other questions?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICso it wasn't in the fight? he may have allegedly been caught trying to cheat but he never actually cheated in the fight? so what fight did he cheat in? shane & team must have agreed that everything was ok for the fight to go forth yeh?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICi thought they allegedly found something wrong with antonio's wraps before the shane fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Thank you. But as someone who presumably follows boxing I'm sure he knew that.
In... the... Shane... fight.
Whether or not it was before the fight, he was caught cheating. Any other questions?
Scratching the bottom of the barrel, eh? :D
Damn... when you have to resort to distinguishing between "caught trying to cheat" and "actually cheating"... you've really run low on ammunition. :D
But hey... it doesn't surprise me that you'd support a cheating scumbag like Margacheato.
I'd be surprised if you didn't.
so what did antonio use to cheat in the shane fight? i'm not supporting anyone. i'm asking you what fight antonio cheated in. shane & team were ok with the fight to go ahead so how did antonio cheat in the fight?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICso it wasn't in the fight? he may have allegedly been caught trying to cheat but he never actually cheated in the fight? so what fight did he cheat in? shane & team must have agreed that everything was ok for the fight to go forth yeh?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICi thought they allegedly found something wrong with antonio's wraps before the shane fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Thank you. But as someone who presumably follows boxing I'm sure he knew that.
In... the... Shane... fight.
Whether or not it was before the fight, he was caught cheating. Any other questions?
Scratching the bottom of the barrel, eh? :D
Damn... when you have to resort to distinguishing between "caught trying to cheat" and "actually cheating"... you've really run low on ammunition. :D
But hey... it doesn't surprise me that you'd support a cheating scumbag like Margacheato.
I'd be surprised if you didn't.
Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
100%.
Which is why I'm not gonna fall into the same trap others continue to fall into with this other topic that shall remain unnamed, lest we start something here in the Boxing board. :D
When you have to play semantics and split insignificant hairs to make a point... you've already lost the argument. :cool:
(BTW, I don't agree that he's good at semantics. Semantics is a discipline, defined as such:
"Semantics is the study of reference, meaning, or truth.
The term can be used to refer to subfields of several distinct disciplines, including philosophy, linguistics and computer science."
I think TIC just likes being contrary without offering any real substance to his point. He feels that by raw repetition of the same wordage, he's accomplishing something, when in actuality he's not.) ;) ;)
the main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
if you think antonio is a cheater for attempting to cheat i have no issue with your opinion. that wasn't my question though. i asked what fight did he cheat in. the fight only starts once the bell rings. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
100%.
Which is why I'm not gonna fall into the same trap others continue to fall into with this other topic that shall remain unnamed, lest we start something here in the Boxing board. :D
When you have to play semantics and split insignificant hairs to make a point... you've already lost the argument. :cool:
(BTW, I don't agree that he's good at semantics. Semantics is a discipline, defined as such:
"Semantics is the study of reference, meaning, or truth.
The term can be used to refer to subfields of several distinct disciplines, including philosophy, linguistics and computer science."
I think TIC just likes being contrary without offering any real substance to his point. He feels that by raw repetition of the same wordage, he's accomplishing something, when in actuality he's not.) ;) ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICif you think antonio is a cheater for attempting to cheat i have no issue with your opinion. that wasn't my question though. i asked what fight did he cheat in. the fight only starts once the bell rings. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
100%.
Which is why I'm not gonna fall into the same trap others continue to fall into with this other topic that shall remain unnamed, lest we start something here in the Boxing board. :D
When you have to play semantics and split insignificant hairs to make a point... you've already lost the argument. :cool:
(BTW, I don't agree that he's good at semantics. Semantics is a discipline, defined as such:
"Semantics is the study of reference, meaning, or truth.
The term can be used to refer to subfields of several distinct disciplines, including philosophy, linguistics and computer science."
I think TIC just likes being contrary without offering any real substance to his point. He feels that by raw repetition of the same wordage, he's accomplishing something, when in actuality he's not.) ;) ;)
The fight prior to Shane was the first Cotto fight. Are we to believe his being caught trying to cheat before the Shane fight was an isolated incident? Can you prove he didn't cheat in the Cotto fight or even before that? And just didn't get caught?
What was his career like after he got caught trying to cheat? Normally when you get caught trying to cheat you've already gotten away with it before.
You have your opinion... I have mine.
Let's leave it at that.
A burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICthe main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?
miguel quit like a bitch. you can believe what you want. your belief isn't proof. why would i need to prove he didn't cheat in the miguel fight or before that? it is not my claim he did. that claim would need to be proven. you always trying to shift the burden of proof. his career after shane is not proof of his cheating in a fight. your opinion is not proofQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICif you think antonio is a cheater for attempting to cheat i have no issue with your opinion. that wasn't my question though. i asked what fight did he cheat in. the fight only starts once the bell rings. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
100%.
Which is why I'm not gonna fall into the same trap others continue to fall into with this other topic that shall remain unnamed, lest we start something here in the Boxing board. :D
When you have to play semantics and split insignificant hairs to make a point... you've already lost the argument. :cool:
(BTW, I don't agree that he's good at semantics. Semantics is a discipline, defined as such:
"Semantics is the study of reference, meaning, or truth.
The term can be used to refer to subfields of several distinct disciplines, including philosophy, linguistics and computer science."
I think TIC just likes being contrary without offering any real substance to his point. He feels that by raw repetition of the same wordage, he's accomplishing something, when in actuality he's not.) ;) ;)
The fight prior to Shane was the first Cotto fight. Are we to believe his being caught trying to cheat before the Shane fight was an isolated incident? Can you prove he didn't cheat in the Cotto fight or even before that? And just didn't get caught?
What was his career like after he got caught trying to cheat? Normally when you get caught trying to cheat you've already gotten away with it before.
You have your opinion... I have mine.
Let's leave it at that.
can there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterA burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICthe main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?
Who cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICcan there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterA burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICthe main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?
you are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterWho cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICcan there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterA burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICthe main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?
If I said the Cotto fight you will say he did not actually get caught. So what is the point of asking which "fight" when you know officially it is none.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICyou are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterWho cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICcan there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterA burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICthe main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?
so officially he never cheated in actual combat? if we go by that, is it not worse for someone like shane who admitted to cheating in combat? or others that have been caught using peds after a fight? these cheaters who cheated in combat are allowed in the hall of fameQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterIf I said the Cotto fight you will say he did not actually get caught. So what is the point of asking which "fight" when you know officially it is none.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICyou are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterWho cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICcan there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterA burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICthe main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICyou are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterWho cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICcan there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterA burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICthe main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?
No. It is you who are missing the point, playing word games to justify the fact that you fully support a known cheater. That again, is your prerogative.
But spare us your "merry-go-round" games like you do with the COVID issue.
I realize that, playground style, you always need to have the last word... so you'll surely have some retort prepared that in essence doesn't prove a damn thing, other than the fact that you willingly overlook the FACTS of what happened and happily support a known cheater.
Again... none of this surprises me.
all you have to do is prove what fight, actual combat antonio cheated in. it has been admitted in this very thread that it is officially none. i am not supporting anyone as i have already said. if you want to say that antonio was caught trying to cheat i have no issue with your opinion. it is not the point i am making. i am asking what fight, actual combat did antonio cheat in. it has been admitted in this thread that the shane fight was fair. so what fight, actual combat did antonio cheat in? let's see if you can bring yourself to be honestQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICyou are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterWho cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICcan there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterA burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by TICthe main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?
No. It is you who are missing the point, playing word games to justify the fact that you fully support a known cheater. That again, is your prerogative.
But spare us your "merry-go-round" games like you do with the COVID issue.
I realize that, playground style, you always need to have the last word... so you'll surely have some retort prepared that in essence doesn't prove a damn thing, other than the fact that you willingly overlook the FACTS of what happened and happily support a known cheater.
Again... none of this surprises me.
I think you're all being a bit harsh on old tlc here, in Court he'd win with this argument...
Saying that though I fully believe that Margarito was up to no good and my belief is that he's a dodgy cheat...
Also can we get back to posting gender swapped boxers....for academic purposes of course :S... What would Katie Taylor or David Haye look like as a man?
All Tic had to say was he sees no difference between someone like Margarito and Mosely. Both cheated rather than go his usual convoluted way to make his point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
I think we all know that. ;D
It boils down to our definition of "cheater". Our definition is someone who cheats or is caught attempting to cheat. Either way he's a cheater. If tic wants to have his own definition, that's fine.
What none of us will do is go down that rabbit hole of "proof" we've seen a nauseating number of times before (see: COVID). :cool:
i asked what fight antonio cheated in. you should have asked if you were unsure by what i meant by fight. for me a fight is the combat that takes place between the ropesQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
i asked what fight antonio cheated in. you made an assumption on what i meant by fight. that is your error. my question was not about the definition of a cheater. it was about what fight, actual combat did antonio cheat in. it has been admitted in this thread that it is none. can you bring yourself to admit that & be honest?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
I think we all know that. ;D
It boils down to our definition of "cheater". Our definition is someone who cheats or is caught attempting to cheat. Either way he's a cheater. If tic wants to have his own definition, that's fine.
What none of us will do is go down that rabbit hole of "proof" we've seen a nauseating number of times before (see: COVID). :cool:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICi asked what fight antonio cheated in. you made an assumption on what i meant by fight. that is your error. my question was not about the definition of a cheater. it was about what fight, actual combat did antonio cheat in. it has been admitted in this thread that it is none. can you bring yourself to admit that & be honest?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
I think we all know that. ;D
It boils down to our definition of "cheater". Our definition is someone who cheats or is caught attempting to cheat. Either way he's a cheater. If tic wants to have his own definition, that's fine.
What none of us will do is go down that rabbit hole of "proof" we've seen a nauseating number of times before (see: COVID). :cool:
NO... IT... HASN'T
Everyone else believes he must have cheated in other fights, if he was caught trying to cheat in the Mosley fight. You choose to believe he never cheated. Your opinion is not any better than anybody else's.
Capiche?
End of story. Good night.