Margarito plans to sue for admittance into HOF

[Master]

Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.

the main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?

A burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.

If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?

[TIC]

Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.

the main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?

A burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.

If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?

can there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?

[Master]

Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.

the main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?

A burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.

If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?

can there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?

Who cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?

[TIC]

Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.

the main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?

A burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.

If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?

can there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?

Who cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?

you are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?

[Master]

Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.

the main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?

A burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.

If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?

can there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?

Who cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?

you are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?

If I said the Cotto fight you will say he did not actually get caught. So what is the point of asking which "fight" when you know officially it is none.

[TIC]

Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.

the main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?

A burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.

If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?

can there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?

Who cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?

you are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?

If I said the Cotto fight you will say he did not actually get caught. So what is the point of asking which "fight" when you know officially it is none.

so officially he never cheated in actual combat? if we go by that, is it not worse for someone like shane who admitted to cheating in combat? or others that have been caught using peds after a fight? these cheaters who cheated in combat are allowed in the hall of fame

[TitoFan]

Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.

the main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?

A burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.

If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?

can there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?

Who cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?

you are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?

No. It is you who are missing the point, playing word games to justify the fact that you fully support a known cheater. That again, is your prerogative.

But spare us your "merry-go-round" games like you do with the COVID issue.

I realize that, playground style, you always need to have the last word... so you'll surely have some retort prepared that in essence doesn't prove a damn thing, other than the fact that you willingly overlook the FACTS of what happened and happily support a known cheater.

Again... none of this surprises me.

[TIC]

Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.

the main point was what fight did cheat in. if you want to say he got caught allegedly trying to cheat, i could understand that stance. but i wasn't asking about attempting to cheat. i asked what fight did he cheat in. you said antonio was caught cheating in the shane fight. do you mean attempting to cheat or in the actual fight? because my question was in what fight did he cheat in. meaning once the bell rung & the fight ended he was caught cheating in the actual fight. so what fight did antonio cheat in?

A burglar can still be charged for burglary even if he did not enter the house he was intending to steal from because he was equipped. Margarita intended to illegally harden his gloves to inflict damage to Mosley. The only reason Shane's team agreed to fight was on the assurance that he had wrapped his gloves fairly after he was caught. Margarito was guilty and suspended for this incident.

If he did it for this fight how many others did he do it in?

can there be a fight without the fighters actually fighting? like i said if you want to say that he was caught allegedly trying to cheat i can understand. you say shanes team agreed to fight because there was an assurance that antonio wrapped his gloves fairly. so antonio fought shane with fairly wrapped gloves. so he didn't cheat in the actual fight with shane. so what fight did he cheat in?

Who cares if it was after the first bell or not? Only you. It does not matter he was found guilty so what more evidence do you need?

you are missing the point. i understand where you are coming from. attempting to cheat, no problem with your position. but according to you the shane fight was fair. so i'm asking what actual fight, bell rings punches thrown did antonio cheat in?

No. It is you who are missing the point, playing word games to justify the fact that you fully support a known cheater. That again, is your prerogative.

But spare us your "merry-go-round" games like you do with the COVID issue.

I realize that, playground style, you always need to have the last word... so you'll surely have some retort prepared that in essence doesn't prove a damn thing, other than the fact that you willingly overlook the FACTS of what happened and happily support a known cheater.

Again... none of this surprises me.

all you have to do is prove what fight, actual combat antonio cheated in. it has been admitted in this very thread that it is officially none. i am not supporting anyone as i have already said. if you want to say that antonio was caught trying to cheat i have no issue with your opinion. it is not the point i am making. i am asking what fight, actual combat did antonio cheat in. it has been admitted in this thread that the shane fight was fair. so what fight, actual combat did antonio cheat in? let's see if you can bring yourself to be honest

[palmerq]

I think you're all being a bit harsh on old tlc here, in Court he'd win with this argument...

Saying that though I fully believe that Margarito was up to no good and my belief is that he's a dodgy cheat...


Also can we get back to posting gender swapped boxers....for academic purposes of course :S... What would Katie Taylor or David Haye look like as a man?