I cut down each round into 3 1 minute segments...and whoever wins 2 of the 3 minutes wins the round...pretty straight forward and usually gives a fair reflection of the round
job biscuit (off to butlins in the morning)!!!
eh eh!!!
I cut down each round into 3 1 minute segments...and whoever wins 2 of the 3 minutes wins the round...pretty straight forward and usually gives a fair reflection of the round
job biscuit (off to butlins in the morning)!!!
eh eh!!!
I would only use this method if its a difficult round to score
job biscuit (hope this gives an insight to method scoring)!!!
eh eh!!!
Anything that gives a fighter an excuse to coast through part of a round is bad, IMO. A fighter who thinks he's taken the 1st two segments can put it on "cruise control" through the last minute. We already have enough of that.
Jack Kearns, who managed Dempsey and Archie Moore, among others, said that he thought judging a fight was the easiest thing in the world. His opinion was that two guys could fight ten rounds, bring in a 10 year old to look at them and 90% of the time he could pick the winner.
Of course nobody likes a guy to score the points and then run around but it is not against boxing rules. Let's take any sport for example, say, soccer. One team scores 2 goals and after that decide to just pass the ball around and make time. Sure, the crowd will boo, they might even throw stuff at the field, but they would go home with their win.
If a guy scored points, connected his opponent, etc. and boxed around or prevented engaging for the last 20 seconds of the round, I would give him the round. Why not?
priority of agression, more scoring shots and how either fighter is represented at the end of a round
watched agbeko-perez 2 yesterday, i had it a shutout barring round 1 and couldnt believe how close the scorecards actually were
one dangerous horrible bloke
Well those two punches where pretty fuckin effective
Pardon my French.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks