Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 70

Thread: Prescott v. McCloskey

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    There's no point in a rematch at all now cos Prescott did lose this weekend, if he had knocked mcclosky out than maybe the fight could have happened. But Prescott proved in that fight that he's not in the league of khan and he would lose I have no doubt. It's not a case of khan being scared , just a fight with Prescott just really does nothing for his career. Prescott has lost three times now since that win and in doing that his stock has gone down significantly. The only way he would have fought khan again is if he didn't lose and continued knocking people out like he did against khan. He brings nothing to the table anymore and I don't see his career going anywhere. Khan however is going places and he has proved that it was just an off night the Prescott defeat. Khan is working very well with roach and he doesnt need a Prescott fight at all.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    There's no point in a rematch at all now cos Prescott did lose this weekend, if he had knocked mcclosky out than maybe the fight could have happened. But Prescott proved in that fight that he's not in the league of khan and he would lose I have no doubt. It's not a case of khan being scared , just a fight with Prescott just really does nothing for his career. Prescott has lost three times now since that win and in doing that his stock has gone down significantly. The only way he would have fought khan again is if he didn't lose and continued knocking people out like he did against khan. He brings nothing to the table anymore and I don't see his career going anywhere. Khan however is going places and he has proved that it was just an off night the Prescott defeat. Khan is working very well with roach and he doesnt need a Prescott fight at all.
    What he brings to the table is that he is the only person to beat Khan. Avenging Khan's only loss is better than beating someone of McCloskey's ilk. On paper it is an easy win for Khan, but people would buy it because of the brutal KO Khan suffered at the hands of Prescott.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    That was ages ago though and Prescott has lost THREE fights, when khan is winning fight of the year against the number two fighter at 140. He's past Prescott, as I said before if he beat mcclosky then maybe , but he lost against. Prescott has shown it was a fluke. Khan would beat him easily!!

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1262
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    What bigger fish does Khan have to fry though? I could see Matthysse/Bradley/Mayweather, but who else?
    Thats what i was getting at hence why i put the " " around bigger fish to fry.

    Bradley can't fight him right now because of promoter issues and when he can come back, he would want a tune up before taking on a big fight like Khan.

    Mayweather is fighting Ortiz and will likely try and get another Pacquiao deal done.

    Matthysse just pulled out of a fight with Morales because of injury and Morales is old and shot so Khan fighting him would be a joke.

    Peterson is a decent option for Khan but i think Prescott does more for him. Peterson is the better fighter but Bradley already beat him and Prescott knocked Khan out in 54 seconds.

    Why Khan doesn't want the rematch, i don't know.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1262
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    That was ages ago though and Prescott has lost THREE fights, when khan is winning fight of the year against the number two fighter at 140. He's past Prescott, as I said before if he beat mcclosky then maybe , but he lost against. Prescott has shown it was a fluke. Khan would beat him easily!!
    It was only three years ago.

    This isn't like Pacquiao rematching Singsurat right now lol.

    He did beat McCloskey, he just didn't get the decision.

    Khan would likely outbox Prescott easily but saying he will do it proves nothing. Khan rematching him and actually doing it means alot more and you know it.

    Khan has no good fights out there right now. Why not rematch the guy that gave you your only loss and knocked you out in 54 seconds.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Because he just got beat by somebody khan beat no too long ago and Mitchell dominated him too, therefore proving khan doesnt need to beat Prescott and would be a waste of time.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1262
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Because he just got beat by somebody khan beat no too long ago and Mitchell dominated him too, therefore proving khan doesnt need to beat Prescott and would be a waste of time.
    Did you actually watch the fight ?

    McCloskey at best deserved a draw.

    Mitchell beat him but it doesn't change the fact that Prescott knocked Khan out in less than a minute.

    It wouldn't be a waste of time.

    Khan avenging a devestating loss like that would help his career. if you think otherwise you are blind.

    It's not like he has a fight signed either.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sunderland, England
    Posts
    1,705
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    881
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    It's annoying that Prescott didn't get the win he deserved as it would have set up a potential rematch with Khan or a fight with Maidana. Prescott against either of those 2 would be far more interesting than McCloskey against one of them imo.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    It's annoying that Prescott didn't get the win he deserved as it would have set up a potential rematch with Khan or a fight with Maidana. Prescott against either of those 2 would be far more interesting than McCloskey against one of them imo.

    i agree

    prescott maidana would be pretty firery
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Yes I did watch it and I think mcclosky edged it IMO. None the less he LOST the fight and how does losing to the guy khan just beat earn you a shot at khans world title? Khans a champion, Prescott is someone who has lost 3 out of the last 6 and has no belt. He brings nothing to the table and as I said before if he beat mcclosky then yes potentially if he couldn't find anyone else he could have faced him. Now Prescott is a nobody, he needs to earn a shot not lose 3 out of 6 and that doesn't merit a fight with khan who has proved he's passed Prescott.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1262
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    Of course you had McCloskey "edging" it.

    Prescott deserved the win, i'm sure the majority of fans agree with me.

    Khan is a champion and has gone on to do better things while Prescott has had his downs since his win over Khan but why does Khan not want to avenge the only loss on his record ?

    Khan deep down surely wants to erase the only loss of his career. He has the chance right now.

    I think he should take it especially since he has no fights lined up.

    You keep telling me why Khan shouldn't fight Prescott so in your opinion, who should Khan fight next ? who is available for Khan's December matchup ?

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I did think mcclosky edged it he came on strongly in the later rounds and I think he was one point ahead.
    It was a close fight but no way Prescott won that fight he started brightly but definatley faded at the end. I understand why you think khan should fight and before he lost to Mitchell and now mcclosky I agreed strongly khan should of fought Prescott. But the times has changed how can Prescott get a shot at 2 belts after losing to mcclosky? I'd prefer mcclosky to have a rematch against khan than Prescott who has lost three of 6. We are going round in circles here though, that's just my opinion.

    Personally I think he should make a defence against a ranked fighter who has earnt his shot. I would like to see him against Antony peterson or maybe even devon Alexander. These are ranked IBF fighters and would give khan more US exposure. Or I wouldn't mind him fighting kell brook in the UK, I reckon that would be a cracking domestic showdown. I also think Maidana deserves a showdown and he also has the WBA belt, which khan has the superbelt version. I would love a Bradley fight too, if it happens is another question. As for Prescott he needs to repair his damaged stock because there is no way he deserves khan, even if he did knock him out. He's a limited fighter who has been exposed three times now.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Because he just got beat by somebody khan beat no too long ago and Mitchell dominated him too, therefore proving khan doesnt need to beat Prescott and would be a waste of time.
    Jesus Christ. The idea of Con geting back into the against Prescott really scares you to death, doesn't it? If it's such an easy win you would think one would say go ahead Con. Get it over with. But no. Con and his groupies want no part to the sequal "Gone in 54 Seconds"

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    Prescott deserved the nod. He was winning by a fair margin going into the championship rounds and fair play on McCloskey digging in, but it wasn't enough IMO.

    There is no good reason for Khan not to fight Prescott. If Lewis can avenge losses then so can Khan. Such a poof for never giving Prescott a rematch.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1784
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Prescott v. McCloskey

    Didn't all 3 judges score it for McCloskey? Majority of the fans doesn't really matter.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. McCloskey to fight Prescott
    By Nameless in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-22-2011, 04:57 PM
  2. How good is McCloskey?
    By Rantcatrat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-16-2011, 06:25 PM
  3. Khan McCloskey Tickets?
    By Conrad in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-10-2011, 08:10 PM
  4. Khan v McCloskey
    By erics44 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-20-2011, 03:57 PM
  5. Anyone Heard Of Paul McCloskey
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 02:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing