Because he just got beat by somebody khan beat no too long ago and Mitchell dominated him too, therefore proving khan doesnt need to beat Prescott and would be a waste of time.
Because he just got beat by somebody khan beat no too long ago and Mitchell dominated him too, therefore proving khan doesnt need to beat Prescott and would be a waste of time.
Did you actually watch the fight ?
McCloskey at best deserved a draw.
Mitchell beat him but it doesn't change the fact that Prescott knocked Khan out in less than a minute.
It wouldn't be a waste of time.
Khan avenging a devestating loss like that would help his career. if you think otherwise you are blind.
It's not like he has a fight signed either.
It's annoying that Prescott didn't get the win he deserved as it would have set up a potential rematch with Khan or a fight with Maidana. Prescott against either of those 2 would be far more interesting than McCloskey against one of them imo.
Jesus Christ. The idea of Con geting back into the against Prescott really scares you to death, doesn't it? If it's such an easy win you would think one would say go ahead Con. Get it over with. But no. Con and his groupies want no part to the sequal "Gone in 54 Seconds"
Prescott deserved the nod. He was winning by a fair margin going into the championship rounds and fair play on McCloskey digging in, but it wasn't enough IMO.
There is no good reason for Khan not to fight Prescott. If Lewis can avenge losses then so can Khan. Such a poof for never giving Prescott a rematch.
Didn't all 3 judges score it for McCloskey? Majority of the fans doesn't really matter.
Last edited by Pugilistic; 09-13-2011 at 02:18 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks