Fact 1: The thread is 16 pages long. My personal contribution is but a small part. Thus, the assertion that I "spent 16 pages trolling" is false.
Fact 2: The assertion that I "avoided the first post that proved my premise of Froch being more likeable than Calzaghe as being false" is fatally flawed from the start. There is no "proving" one boxer being more or less likeable than another.
I would continue, but you get the point.
Enough facts for you....... my friend?
Bookmarks