Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Wow.... your response to my facts was, well....... overwhelming.
How do you respond to logic like that?
What facts would those be my friend?


Fact 1: The thread is 16 pages long. My personal contribution is but a small part. Thus, the assertion that I "spent 16 pages trolling" is false.

Fact 2: The assertion that I "avoided the first post that proved my premise of Froch being more likeable than Calzaghe as being false" is fatally flawed from the start. There is no "proving" one boxer being more or less likeable than another.


I would continue, but you get the point.
Enough facts for you....... my friend?

It was your thread, you started it and propagated the huge amount of bullshit in it you plum. You were condescending to Iaminuit then, just like you are being now. You spent the whole thread talking Jackson Pollacks after admitting only watching 2 Calzaghe fights. From the off in the first post you moaned like a moaning Minnie about not enjoying watching Calzaghe fight as much as Froch, so it was pretty clear the likeability factor was a red herring. You had nothing to say and spent 16 pages trying to back out of a corner after being owned by a clearly inebriated Fenster. You are a very silly boy.