Also what on earth are you talking about with Blair? I have made lots of threads about Blair over the years and I call these people out for what they are. I was always against the wars, lots of Bush threads too. It doesn't take me any time to catch up as I was there from the off. I am consistent and I am completely comfortable with my position. If I was miscuing politically I would accept your point, but I think you are wide of the mark there. The only miscue was with Obama originally, but since Obama, I have completely deprogrammed my political education and I like where my political views are now. I feel more knowledgeable than ever before and it comes from a wide range of inputs, left, right, and centre.

You cannot be a maverick as there are other people who speak and write, and you share things in common with them too. You cannot be a maverick when it comes to politics and geopolitics. You have to look at the facts, weed out the gibberish, and surprisingly enough the names listed above, seem to think as I do. If I was relating to the views of the general propaganda establishment, then something would definitely be wrong. I wouldn't be telling the truth for a start and my views are consistent as the patterns are usually quite predictable. It's either an invasion, a coup, or else a provocation. Dozens of countries have been affected since WW2 and so the culprit is usually easily identified. This is a telling case. It's so predictable that you have to assume that they just don't care anymore and I refuse to accept that any intelligent person cannot see it for what it is. It's a massive provocation and the WW3 argument is like the Iraq 45 minutes claim.

These journalists show exactly why the British and American media is so lowly ranked these days. The BBC should be abolished.