iran

[Kirkland Laing]

Why would this be controversial? I mean Iran has been engaged in these activities (funding terrorism/terrorist groups) for decades so why would the US helping Iran free up more money to fund those "activities we don't like" be "controversial"?

It's not like MORE money would allow Iran to give MORE to the terrorists trying to kill and maim Americans and our Allies....but don't they deserve it?

No no, @El Kabong , didn't you hear Kirk said in a decade or so Iran will be our best ally in the Middle East, even though the theocracy didn't consider themselves part of the middle east but a Persian caliphate. @El Kabong , when are you going to realize that you are an idiot and the graphs of Kirkland can not be argued with. Iran will magically join the world community and drop all hostile actions they can now create clean reliable nuclear energy which is all they ever wanted. They just want to clean the environment. Just like Clinton's deal with North Korea, they are now the best of allies, we might as well just pack up over there, I'm sure China wouldn't try anything funny.

Iran can't really help being part of the Middle East, geography and everything. They don't consider themselves part of the Arab world because they're not Arabs, they're Aryans.

And they really have been after nuclear power for a long time now.





And you need tounderstand the economics of countries invading other countries. It's incredibly expensive. China's economy is under massive pressure at the minute and they couldn't afford an occupation of an incredibly poor country where they'd have to basically feed however many millions of North Koreans there are. China's worst nightmare is the North Korean regime collapsing because they'd have to deal with millions of refugees. China give them millions in aid every year to keep the fucking regime together because the alternative is a disastrous situation for China.

It takes a special type of talent to wet the bed over ridiculous scenarios like that.