iran

[walrus]

Why would this be controversial? I mean Iran has been engaged in these activities (funding terrorism/terrorist groups) for decades so why would the US helping Iran free up more money to fund those "activities we don't like" be "controversial"?

It's not like MORE money would allow Iran to give MORE to the terrorists trying to kill and maim Americans and our Allies....but don't they deserve it?

No no, @El Kabong, didn't you hear Kirk said in a decade or so Iran will be our best ally in the Middle East, even though the theocracy didn't consider themselves part of the middle east but a Persian caliphate. @El Kabong, when are you going to realize that you are an idiot and the graphs of Kirkland can not be argued with. Iran will magically join the world community and drop all hostile actions they can now create clean reliable nuclear energy which is all they ever wanted. They just want to clean the environment. Just like Clinton's deal with North Korea, they are now the best of allies, we might as well just pack up over there, I'm sure China wouldn't try anything funny.

[Gandalf]

Under international law Iran was free to make whatever nuclear energy it wanted anyway. Most countries do just that. The only problem with Iran is that the US colony in the Middle East, Israel wants any excuse to bomb them whence all the crazy propaganda about nukes. The US has nukes, Israel has illegal nukes, the UK has nukes, but Iran wants nuclear power and that is tantamount to nukes? There is no rational discussion of the issue. It's crazy land. 'Oh, but dem Muslims, dey can't have dem nukes. They's crazy, ya know!'. Sure, they are. They invade all their neighbors and non neighbors, right? The arrogance of putting sanctions on Iran was just astounding and the hubris coming out of Washington shockingly bad.

[Kirkland Laing]

Why would this be controversial? I mean Iran has been engaged in these activities (funding terrorism/terrorist groups) for decades so why would the US helping Iran free up more money to fund those "activities we don't like" be "controversial"?

It's not like MORE money would allow Iran to give MORE to the terrorists trying to kill and maim Americans and our Allies....but don't they deserve it?

No no, @El Kabong , didn't you hear Kirk said in a decade or so Iran will be our best ally in the Middle East, even though the theocracy didn't consider themselves part of the middle east but a Persian caliphate. @El Kabong , when are you going to realize that you are an idiot and the graphs of Kirkland can not be argued with. Iran will magically join the world community and drop all hostile actions they can now create clean reliable nuclear energy which is all they ever wanted. They just want to clean the environment. Just like Clinton's deal with North Korea, they are now the best of allies, we might as well just pack up over there, I'm sure China wouldn't try anything funny.

Iran can't really help being part of the Middle East, geography and everything. They don't consider themselves part of the Arab world because they're not Arabs, they're Aryans.

And they really have been after nuclear power for a long time now.





And you need tounderstand the economics of countries invading other countries. It's incredibly expensive. China's economy is under massive pressure at the minute and they couldn't afford an occupation of an incredibly poor country where they'd have to basically feed however many millions of North Koreans there are. China's worst nightmare is the North Korean regime collapsing because they'd have to deal with millions of refugees. China give them millions in aid every year to keep the fucking regime together because the alternative is a disastrous situation for China.

It takes a special type of talent to wet the bed over ridiculous scenarios like that.

[El Kabong]

Iran can't really help being part of the Middle East, geography and everything. They don't consider themselves part of the Arab world because they're not Arabs, they're Aryans.

And they really have been after nuclear power for a long time now.





And you need tounderstand the economics of countries invading other countries. It's incredibly expensive. China's economy is under massive pressure at the minute and they couldn't afford an occupation of an incredibly poor country where they'd have to basically feed however many millions of North Koreans there are. China's worst nightmare is the North Korean regime collapsing because they'd have to deal with millions of refugees. China give them millions in aid every year to keep the fucking regime together because the alternative is a disastrous situation for China.

It takes a special type of talent to wet the bed over ridiculous scenarios like that.

Yes, nuclear "power"

[Kirkland Laing]

Yes, nuclear "power"

Yes, nuclear power.

Also, too.


Three dozen retired generals and admirals released an open letter Tuesday supporting the Iran nuclear deal and urging Congress to do the same.
Calling the agreement “the most effective means currently available to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons,” the letter said that gaining international support for military action against Iran, should that ever become necessary, “would only be possible if we have first given the diplomatic path a chance.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...fd2_story.html

[El Kabong]

Yes, nuclear "power"

Yes, nuclear power.

Also, too.


Three dozen retired generals and admirals released an open letter Tuesday supporting the Iran nuclear deal and urging Congress to do the same.
Calling the agreement “the most effective means currently available to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons,” the letter said that gaining international support for military action against Iran, should that ever become necessary, “would only be possible if we have first given the diplomatic path a chance.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...fd2_story.html

K, good luck