Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
A person defending a fighter because they happen to be friends, and because..... (cough) "he's a nice guy"..... doesn't amount to diddly squat when it comes to proving that fighter's innocence or lack of guilt as it were. For this person to be crying foul, or conspiracy, or kangaroo court, whatever.... is both laughable and a travesty. Maybe if a convicted cheater was my personal friend and I knew both him and his wife... maybe I'd behave in the same transparent, biased, blind, totally subjective manner.

.... but I would hope not.

All I have ever said from day one is.......


Show me one iota of proof, not accusations but proof, that Tony Margarito EVER tried to load his gloves & I'd be all over him like a cheap suit calling for a permanent ban but no one has been able to do that.
As for it being a kangaroo court? It was a perfect example of one..
The CSAC banned Margarito on the word of Nazim Richardson. They accused Margarito of cheating making them the prosecution they had no proof of any cheating tho.
Margarito was banned for 2 years by the prosecuter not by any court. The CSAC had nothing to show any court but Margarito was STILL deemed guilty & had his reputation tarnished & his career railroaded.. Margarito never was given a chance to defend himself. the Csac just said " You look guilty so you must be guilty
That is a Kangaroo court