Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
So now you're back to claiming the rankings as accurate?

Therefore they prove me correct that the welterweight division is stronger than heavyweight. You can't deny that otherwise Fury's ranking is utterly meaningless. Fact.
Ok the Welterweight division is more competative where no one is really much better than the rest I agree with you.

My whole point of starting posting in this pointless thread is to point out the blatantly obvious that Tyson is better than Brook as is backed up by indipendant rankings and makes a mockery of all your bitter biased opinions.
Before the Wlad fight Fury was higher in the rankings? Was Wlad better then Fury all the way until he lost to him? The boxrec rankings mean fuck all. Sure they dont have Gonzalez or Inoue in their top 20
To be the best you have to beat the best which in Britain Tyson is the only fighter to do so.