Re: Ward/Kovalev 2...who wins?

Originally Posted by
TitoFan

Originally Posted by
erics44

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
erics44
lb4lb shouldn't be confused with which are the best boxers
and I'm about 14 stone myself now so you never know were the extra chub would take me

What do you think pound for pound means?
Do you think it means Choco could give Wlad a fight?

nope, that's my point
people are talking about certain boxers being the "best boxer in the world" because they are lb4lb
but they aren't they best boxers in the world
not by a long shot
Is it that difficult to understand that being a good boxer has nothing to do with size?
Your original statement was that "the best boxers in the world are the bigger boxers."
We've already shown you instances where that's simply not true.
Skill is skill. Size is size. One is independent of the other.
Leonard was one of the best boxers in history. Better than probably most if not all of the heavyweights in history.
Yet he wouldn't stand a chance in the ring against a decent heavyweight, even one who's not a good boxer.
I'm puzzled as to what the confusion still is.
if one cricket team would beat another cricket team every time they played them then would they be better at cricket?
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Bookmarks