Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
lb4lb shouldn't be confused with which are the best boxers

and I'm about 14 stone myself now so you never know were the extra chub would take me
What do you think pound for pound means?

Do you think it means Choco could give Wlad a fight?
nope, that's my point

people are talking about certain boxers being the "best boxer in the world" because they are lb4lb

but they aren't they best boxers in the world

not by a long shot


Is it that difficult to understand that being a good boxer has nothing to do with size?

Your original statement was that "the best boxers in the world are the bigger boxers."

We've already shown you instances where that's simply not true.

Skill is skill. Size is size. One is independent of the other.

Leonard was one of the best boxers in history. Better than probably most if not all of the heavyweights in history.

Yet he wouldn't stand a chance in the ring against a decent heavyweight, even one who's not a good boxer.

I'm puzzled as to what the confusion still is.
if one cricket team would beat another cricket team every time they played them then would they be better at cricket?