Did Cotto quit (Please read first)

[Dizaster]

This is my last post on this subject. My criteria is very simple, "if a boxer quits in several fights then he's a quitter to me"...

I didn't call Cotto a quitter but if Cotto quits again in a future fight then definitely I will label him a quitter for it's more than once already.

Bash me if you want but that's my criteria for a quitter.
.

Let's just hope that in his next fight, if he is equally spent and beaten, he realises this point, and stands to get KO'd for all the fans.. For the critics who will DEFINETELY label him a quitter for avoiding brain damage TWICE...

I mean, avoiding brutal punishment once when you know your done, that's one thing.. But to avoid a violent demise twice when you know your legs will stay under you for more poundings to the head? Well that's just weak! That's just quitting buddy! Keep those legs under you, and keep your head in line for those punches you deserve... You stepped in there,,, you've been beaten,,, now take your punishment like a man.... You're hands can stay at your side, that's fine, just as long as your head stays up there.. Stand there like a man and let the other guy finish you..... That's what being a warrior is all about!!

I just think it's poor attitude,, and there is more that your missing in this case...

I understand where you're coming from in contrast to guys getting themselves KO'd very regularly, but you gotta look at the specifics. And the specifics of Cotto's next fight, and the fight after that.... I can't can't beleive it's as easy as saying "If Cotto loses a fight without actually being knocked out, in more then a few fights, then that would make him a quitter"... I think it's a poor attitude rather than poor opinion..

In the scenario you're presenting, the referee is there to stop the fight in order to save the boxer who cannot defend himself anymore...

(Why can't I just quit posting... I'm confused... )

What can I say.. You're a warrior...