I'm not going to hold SaddoBoxer's opinion against him or Markusdarkus. But I am going to strongly agree with some of the other posts I've seen on here. The word "quitter" is always used in a negative sense. There's nothing positive about it. And if you can honestly watch the Cotto-Margarito fight, and still call Cotto a quitter..... then IMO you have a hidden agenda. It's disrespectful to a consumate professional, who gives a great show to us fans and basically wants to continue to do so in the future. My comments on some of the posts:
Agree wholeheartedly. It seems some people's definitions of "warrior" and "quitter" are different from the norm.
Agreed once again.
Oh hell, yeah. Again, great points and well stated.
Well, let's just say I'm glad you're not going to be writing any history books.
I liked the part about the two-bit fans. I'd rep you, but gotta spread the wealth first.
You better believe it, Spicoli. Well said.
You harped on this a lot. So there's a quota system? I don't get that. Circumstances are circumstances. As many people on here have said, "quitting" has a very negative connotation. You can quote Cotto interviews, you can quote Webster's Dictionary, you can put whatever the hell spin on it. But callling any prizefighter a "quitter" is just plain insulting, and 99.99% of boxing fans will agree with that.
Bookmarks